@DMEASrecruiting@VandyonTigers You teach what you can, and FIND what you can’t. The whole process is fundamentally different because the training is better.
@DMEASrecruiting@VandyonTigers No, the PLAYERS don’t get it. You almost got it. It’s different. They eval differently because they have better training tools now. There’s ways to get that guy that can’t locate to locate better. There’s no way to make a body not built for it to sustain 100+.
@sooperfly88@BamaVisualz Dude I’ve sat and watched the private planes file into Oxford for games. The money is quiet and spread over more people instead of a “superdonor”, but the money is there.
@kumar_patel69 I’ll never forget my baseball coach retired and the next time I saw him I called him coach. He said “not coach anymore, I’m retired.” I told him he wasn’t getting off that easy and he’d always be coach to me. Though one of the toughest men I know was going to break down.
@indy_sooner I would still argue “great”. Im definitely biased, but not blinded. There’s only 20 teams with at least 3 recognized titles in the poll era. Outside of those title windows, Ole Miss is one of the 10 best programs out of those 20
@CoachTimOlson1@CheapoHal Yes. We started seeing more of this, then you started seeing more guys pushing velo and spin rate to the edge of their biological possibilities. They CAN do it now because they don’t have to go 7-8 every day.
@CheapoHal never had Lincecum if somebody wasn’t willing to push biology and physics. Once we have the new generational “guy” on the mound like Maddux or Pedro, that guy will be better than them. The world advances.
@CheapoHal Yall are talking about two different “better”s. Pitchers ARE better in the sense they’ve upped velocity, spin rate, etc. but the greats would be great in any era. There was SOMETHING that made them great. Pitchers used to pitch *within their means* better, but we would have