Rob Edwards

My pronouns are handsome and brilliant. Proud graduate of the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@american_kitty @BillWiIdin Only 3 days ago, "Bill" posted:

"NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE ARE LEAVING TEXAS…

Moved here thinking I was escaping high-cost states."

One day he says he lives in Texas, 3 days later, Wisconsin.

Evidently he don't know X displays his old posts.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@xianghu73574129 We've nearly eliminated boredom.

That's new for humans.

Boredom breeds creatively.

Who needs to be creative when you're constantly entertained?

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@WMatire JAMA Network Open study (Wright et al.) using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample for 2016–2020:

Approximately 5,300–6,300 double mastectomies on girls under 18 in the US from 2017–2023 were performed in the context of gender-affirming care.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@BillWiIdin So X is lying to everyone by indicating your account is African?

Is it some plot by Elon and the evil billionaires?

You're an NGO funded African bot.

You're paid to push propaganda on social media using money meant to feed starving children.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Si vous ne posséderez rien, alors une question devient obligatoire.

Qui possédera tout ?

Personne ne la pose. Moi je la pose. Et la réponse est sous vos yeux depuis 30 ans.

Marx voulait centraliser les moyens de production entre les mains de l'État. Ça a échoué partout, dans le sang et la pénurie. Mais l'idée n'est jamais morte. Elle a juste appris à ne plus se présenter sous son nom.

Le communisme du XXe siècle confisquait les usines par la force. Celui du XXIe ne confisque rien. Il régule, il taxe, il subventionne, il oriente. Et à la fin, vous êtes toujours propriétaire sur le papier, mais vous ne décidez plus de rien.

C'est ça, le projet européen dans sa version finale. Et je vais vous le démontrer, moyen de production par moyen de production.

La terre. Votre agriculteur ne décide plus ce qu'il plante, comment il le plante, ni à quel prix il vend. Bruxelles décide via la PAC, les normes, les quotas, les accords de libre-échange signés au-dessus de sa tête. Il est propriétaire de sa ferme comme un locataire est propriétaire de ses meubles.

L'énergie. Le prix de votre électricité est fixé par un marché européen indexé sur le gaz, alors que la France produit l'une des électricités les moins chères du monde grâce au nucléaire. Qui décide ? Pas vous.

L'industrie. Quotas carbone, normes, taxonomie verte qui dit aux banques quelles entreprises ont le droit d'être financées. Interdiction votée des moteurs thermiques neufs en 2035. On ne nationalise plus l'usine. On lui dicte ce qu'elle a le droit de produire.

La monnaie. Une banque centrale non élue fixe le prix de l'argent pour tout le continent. Et maintenant, l'euro numérique : une monnaie programmable émise directement par cette même institution.

Votre épargne. Bruxelles a désormais un plan officiel pour "orienter" les milliers de milliards d'euros que les Européens ont sur leurs comptes vers les "priorités stratégiques" de l'Union. Votre argent, leurs priorités.

La dette. En 2020, l'Union a franchi la ligne qu'elle avait juré de ne jamais franchir : 750 milliards d'euros de dette commune. Un pouvoir budgétaire central, sans peuple européen pour le contrôler.

Terre, énergie, industrie, monnaie, épargne, dette. Tout. Remonte. Au même endroit.

Une technostructure que personne n'a élue, que personne ne peut renvoyer, et dont personne ne connaît le visage de ceux qui écrivent vraiment les textes.

Et qui a accès à cette technostructure ?

Pas vous. Pas votre maire. Pas votre député.

Ceux qui ont des bureaux à Bruxelles. Des dizaines de milliers de lobbyistes. Et des milliardaires qui ont compris bien avant tout le monde que c'est là que le pouvoir se déplaçait.

George Soros a sa propre structure de lobbying à Bruxelles via l'Open Society. Il a cofinancé la création du Conseil européen des relations étrangères, l'un des think tanks les plus influents du continent. En 2020, il plaidait publiquement pour que l'Union émette une dette perpétuelle commune. Quelques mois plus tard, l'Union lançait sa première grande dette commune. Il finance des milliers d'ONG qui viennent ensuite "représenter la société civile" dans les consultations de la Commission.

Bill Gates, lui, est devenu le premier contributeur de l'OMS, une organisation dont les recommandations ont dicté les politiques sanitaires de l'Europe entière pendant le Covid. Il est le plus grand propriétaire privé de terres agricoles aux États-Unis. Sa fondation finance des rubriques entières dans de grands médias européens. Un homme qui n'a jamais reçu une seule voix pèse plus lourd dans la santé mondiale que la plupart des gouvernements élus.

Ils n'ont pas besoin de contrôler. Ils financent, ils conseillent, ils pilotent les experts que la Commission consulte. Le système est conçu pour que ceux qui ont l'argent et l'accès écrivent les règles, et que ceux qui votent les subissent.

Et quand ce système est corrompu, on le voit.

Qatargate : des valises de billets saisies au cœur du Parlement européen.

Pfizergate : la présidente de la Commission négocie par SMS des contrats de vaccins portant sur des milliards de doses, refuse de rendre les messages publics, et se fait désavouer par la justice européenne pour ce refus.

Voilà la démonstration complète.

On vous a appris que le communisme, c'était l'État qui possède tout. La version moderne est plus intelligente : une technostructure qui contrôle tout, alimentée par une poignée de milliardaires qui financent l'idéologie, et un peuple qui garde des titres de propriété vides de tout pouvoir.

Vous ne posséderez rien. Eux, si.

La souveraineté, ce n'est pas un slogan. C'est la capacité d'un peuple à décider de ce qu'il produit, de ce qu'il mange, de ce qu'il paie et de ce qu'il transmet. Chaque compétence transférée à Bruxelles est un moyen de production qui vous échappe.

Partagez. Ce débat ne passera jamais au 20h.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@BillWiIdin Bill is one of the most prolific NGO funded African bot accounts on X.

Money sent to feed starving children is stolen to pay these bots to push DNC talking points.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@OmotolaniWorld Why would some random person in Africa masquerade as an American to post over 500 messages about American economics/politics in the last 30 days?

Why do all the posts sound like a DNC press release?

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@_Lin_inc A nonprofit in Texas whose account is based in, and posts from, Africa.

Sure.

For every NGO funded Africzn bot account you block, 5 more will magically appear.

Isn't it a remarkable coincidence how all of them parrot DNC talking points?

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@4HumanUnity The trillionaire doesn't make it, his vast array of successful businesses do.

SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, X, Grok and the rest.

These companies take most of their profits and invest in research, development , and innovations.

You think every dollar goes into Elon's bank account

[A Gene Robinson @AlGeneRobi96834]

🚨What if Black suffering in America was never a problem politicians intended to solve? 🚨

🚨What if it became one of the most lucrative political enterprises in American history?

I have reached a disturbing conclusion, and I didn’t arrive here through political allegiance. I arrived here by examining the outcomes.

After more than 60 years of Democratic political dominance in cities like Buffalo, New York, I have one question: WHERE ARE THE RESULTS?

We have watched billions allocated to poverty reduction, educational equity, housing, economic development, and community revitalization. Yet I can walk through neighborhoods where Black children struggle to read proficiently, families remain trapped in generational poverty, and entire communities are still waiting for the prosperity politicians have promised for decades.

This is the great political paradox of Black America. The worse our conditions become, the more justification politicians have to demand additional funding to supposedly correct them.

And when the outcomes fail to improve, who gets held accountable?

Nobody!

Now, with Elon Musk and DOGE raising questions about federal expenditures, waste, and government accountability, I want to ask something even more consequential.

How much of the money appropriated in the name of Black suffering actually reached Black families, improved Black neighborhoods, or produced measurable improvements in Black children’s lives?

I am beginning to suspect that Black suffering has become a political commodity, an inexhaustible source of appropriations, contracts, administrative positions, and political influence.

And I want you to understand something. I am not presenting that suspicion as a proven conspiracy. I am demanding the financial records and measurable outcomes that would either substantiate it or expose it as false.

Because after six decades, we are entitled to something more substantial than another promise, another program, and another politician standing in front of a camera pretending to care.

Perhaps the most disturbing question isn’t why these policies have failed.

Perhaps it’s why the same political establishment keeps getting rewarded for the failure.

Watch this video. I’m going to explain exactly why I have begun questioning whether the political establishment ever intended to solve the problems it has spent generations campaigning on.

#AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@ColeLamora66013 @jeremyct $16.94 after the 5.5% sales tax.

Marcos often has good deals on Medium pizzas under $15.

Wawa offers a breakfast sandwich, hash brown and coffee for $5.

Check mailers like your parents did when they were kids. You'll find specials from fast food and local restaurants.

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

The Club of Rome was founded in the late 1960s by a core of disenchanted scientists, rich industrialists and bureaucrats.

They were the embryo of today's familiar climate activism aims, blaming unchecked population growth, industrial expansion and resource consumption for an impending collapse of civilisation within a century.

Their 1972 report, The Limits to Growth, popularised the concept of finite planetary boundaries and the perceived necessity of global growth management. This same core ideology drives the supranational climate agenda today.

In 1951, the UN incorporated the World Meteorological Organization, and in 1988 it created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These twin agencies became the chief architects of an ongoing environmental crisis narrative. Both operate with explicit political mandates: providing governments with curated scientific rationale to justify top-down climate mandates.

The underlying aim was always to frame human development - driven by energy use and population - as an existential threat. While IPCC assessment reports themselves were often selectively edited, UN leadership routinely amplified only the most radical, worst-case projections, distilling complex data into slogans of 'global boiling' or a 'code red for humanity'.

The result has been a feedback loop of escalating rhetoric, artificial urgency and public hysteria - language not supported even by the underlying technical documents. Meanwhile, dissent was quietly neutralised; scientific careers were bypassed, funding diverted and academic tenure denied to those who questioned this orthodoxy.

The core scientific claim relies on the premise that human emissions - roughly 3 to 4% of the total annual carbon flux - are overwhelming a naturally stable cycle. Yet Earth has experienced multiple sustained warm periods throughout the current Holocene interglacial; temperatures were 1 to 2°C warmer than today during the Holocene Climatic Optimum 8,000 to 5,000 years ago.

The previous warm interglacial period, the Eemian, was 2°C warmer than today; African megafauna lived in the Thames Valley. CO₂ played no part.

Furthermore, satellite observations confirm the planet has greened dramatically since the 1980s, expanding leaf-area index by an area equivalent to twice the continental United States - primarily driven by CO₂ fertilisation (NASA 2016, 2019; Zhu et al, Chen et al).

While adding atmospheric CO₂ produces warming, it does so on a diminishing logarithmic scale. The critical debate, therefore, has never been basic physics, but rather the magnitude of warming, the balance of real-world harms, and whether the mandated policy remedies are worse than the disease.

After four decades of warning and trillions of dollars in subsidies, wind and solar still supply only about 6% of global primary energy, while dense hydrocarbon fuels generate 82% (Statistical Review of World Energy 2024).

Western economies have been rushed into rapid, capital-intensive energy transitions for which grid infrastructure was never designed, driving systemic price spikes and manufacturing off-shoring. Strategic dominance over supply chains has shifted, with China now manufacturing over 90% of the world’s solar panels and wind turbines.

Meanwhile, annual COP summits have evolved into the world’s most extravagant traveling public relations circus - generating an estimated 100,000 tonnes of CO₂ at COP26 alone from fleets of private jets and five-star accommodations - to broker sweeping pledges that developing nations have little capacity or intention to fulfill.

That the climate debate touches on legitimate environmental questions is to be expected. But the overarching policy response has been shaped from its genesis by the same impulse that birthed the Club of Rome: restrict energy use, limit economic growth, and dilute national sovereignty.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@preshyct Why would some rando in Africa be impersonating an American on social media to post about affordability?

Why do their posts always parrot DNC talking point?

Is it a remarkable coincidence?

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@BillWiIdin What African warlord wants to charge your NGO funded account $1,800?

Don't you feel the slightest bit guilty getting money funneled to you meant to feed starving African children?

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@BillWiIdin Bill is one of most prolific NGO funded African bot accounts on X.

Like the other bits, he posts contrived scenarios for fictitious family members.

He's paid to push DNC propaganda using money meant to feed starving African children.

You tax dollars pay for his posts.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@JoyceS763 Twenty years ago, if someone told you children were given puberty-blocking drugs and surgically altered in an attempt to change their sex, you would have guessed it was Germany's Josef Mengele.

[Rob Edwards @Edwards66Rob]

@JoyceS763 37 Senate Democrats, including Joe Biden, voted for Reagan's tax cuts.

With a 243-D to 192-R control of the House, Reagan's tax cuts passed with 48 Democrats voting for it.

Times have changed.