Someone asked me where my feelings for Islam come from. Thereโs the problem.
I donโt have โfeelingsโ for Islam. I simply have facts about the religion.
They follow a man named Mohammed.
This man was a pedophile. He married a six year old and had sex with her when she was nine.
His teachings are ones that tell his followers to kill anyone who doesnโt believe in Islam.
He preached that you could lie to anyone who didnโt believe in Islam and tell them anything you felt like to convert them.
Islam treats women like shit. They have to wear burqas and are second-class citizens in every situation. Itโs totally permissible to beat the living hell out of your wife for no reason.
Rape is also permissible to any woman who is not a Moslem. Itโs literally a tool of war in Islam.
Mohammedโs followers also take on the role of โjihadistโ in which they kill anyone who doesnโt believe in their religion.
Theyโve convinced themselves that the best thing on earth is a black box and they pray to it five times a day in doggystyle position.
They wonโt touch bacon and think itโs deadly.
They canโt use toilet paper.
They canโt even draw a picture of the Prophet they love so much. Must be an ugly dude!
Theyโve even been convinced by their Pedophile Prophet that dogs are impure and dirty.
Now, these facts make it a pretty shitty religion if you ask meโฆ and that would be fine if they practiced it in silence and didnโt try to impose it on others.
They have 55 countries where they are able to practice it, however flawed it may be. I donโt have to live there so thatโs fine.
But theyโve decided to come to the West and want me to change my way of life to adapt to their way of life.
Iโm supposed to eat halal meat because they eat halal meat.
Iโm supposed to give up my dog because they donโt like dogs.
Iโm supposed to let the take down the World Trade Center and not complain about it and just move on and allow them to worship their Allah?
Iโm supposed to believe that the book they love to reference is a book of peace.
And if I question any of it Iโm Islamophobic.
So, when you ask how I developed my feelings on the Moslemsโฆ I quite simply evaluated the facts.
The facts make it clear this is not something for me.
Despite knowing that, they tried to impose it on me anyway.
So now I cannot stand it. And thatโs all.
Sam Harris sits quietly as Bill Maher calls out the NYT for pushing readers toward an opinion on the โIran War.โ
โThe second day of the warโฆ The New York Timesโ headline was โUS troops die.โ That was what they led with.โ
โBut then, in a country where Iโve read 80 to 90% of the people are thrilled that the Ayatollah is gone, what picture did they put? Picture of people mourning the Ayatollahโฆโ
โI canโt believe that somebody at the desk didnโt get, โIโve got a great picture of people dancing in the streets.โ Yeah, weโre gonna go with the 10% who are sorry the Ayatollah is dead because thatโs gonna funnel the thought of our readers toward, โOh, this is a bad war to get into.โโ
โThat, to me, is the difference in what the media does now and what they didnโt used to do. Youโre funneling me toward an opinion, whereas I would love it if you just told me what happened.โ
After a couple of low-energy โyeahs,โ Harris conceded: โThe boundary between activism and journalism has clearly broken down.โ
๐ฉ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ก๐ฆ๐ข๐ก: ๐ง๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฃ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐๐
Victor Davis Hanson โ one of the greatest military historians alive โ laid out exactly why what Trump just did in Iran isn't just a military victory. It's a ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป.
His argument is simple: ๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ด๐ผ๐ผ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป. No Iran means no money for H-z-b, no money for H-m-s, no money for the Houthis. China loses its proxy in the Middle East. Russia already lost Syria. Now it loses Iran.
North Korea, Russia, and China have been supplying Iran with drones and missiles. That pipeline is now severed. And without Iranian petrodollars flowing to terror proxies across the region, Israel can finish the job at its ease.
But Hanson zooms out further. This isn't haphazard. Trump is methodically dismantling the entire axis โ Iran, Cuba, Venezuela โ ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ฎ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ด๐ผ๐ฎ๐น: breaking up the China-Russia-North Korea nexus that has been the source of global instability for decades.
And the message to Beijing is unmistakable: ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ณ๐ด๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐ป. This is a new military. One that doesn't do DEI briefings and drag shows on base. One that delivers results.
Peace through strength isn't a bumper sticker. It's a track record.
๐ง๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฝ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐.
Yesterday, I explained how seven insurance firms in London shut down one-fifth of the world's oil supply.
Today, Trump may have just made the most aggressive sovereign insurance play in modern history.
Here's what happened and why it matters:
Trump ordered the U.S. Development Finance Corporation to immediately offer political risk insurance and guarantees to all maritime trade through the Gulf. Especially energy. Backed by Navy escorts if needed.
Read that through the lens of what I described yesterday.
The Strait didn't close because of missiles. It closed because the insurance market collapsed. P&I clubs pulled coverage, reinsurers withdrew, and the entire commercial shipping architecture froze.
This move doesn't address the military problem. It addresses the actuarial one.
The DFC is stepping into the void that Lloyd's and the London reinsurance market created when they pulled out. The U.S. government is effectively saying: we will underwrite what the private market won't.
No sovereign has attempted to replace the global marine war risk market in real time during an active conflict. Here's why the structural implications are significant:
1. It challenges Lloyd's dominance.
For centuries, London has been the center of gravity for marine insurance. Lloyd's and its reinsurers controlled pricing, terms, and risk appetite for global shipping.
That concentration is exactly what made the actuarial blockade possible. A handful of firms in one city froze global oil flows.
The DFC offering competitive political risk coverage to all shipping lines is a direct challenge to that architecture. If American-backed insurance proves cheaper and more reliable during crises, shippers may not return to London when the dust settles.
2. It breaks the actuarial blockade.
I said yesterday that China has massive leverage over Iran but zero leverage over Lloyd's. The same was true of every oil-producing and oil-consuming nation watching their economies choke.
This goes around the insurance market entirely. If the DFC covers the voyage and the Navy escorts the tanker, the ships sail. Oil flows. The spreadsheet blockade breaks.
3. It redirects billions in premium revenue.
War risk premiums in the Gulf are currently running at extreme multiples โ 3ร to 5ร pre-conflict rates. Those premiums were flowing to London reinsurers who then pulled coverage anyway.
Now those premiums flow to Washington. At rates the DFC can set below the panicked London market, while still generating substantial returns. The same shippers get cheaper coverage. The revenue just changes continents.
4. It creates a chokepoint within the chokepoint.
The Strait of Hormuz is already the world's most critical energy bottleneck. If the U.S. is both insurer and naval escort, America controls access at two levels: physical security and financial coverage.
No other nation can replicate that. You need the world's dominant navy and a sovereign balance sheet large enough to backstop the risk. Only one country has both.
5. It reassures every stakeholder simultaneously.
Gulf producers were watching exports freeze. Asian and European consumers were watching energy prices spike. Both feared the Iran campaign would wreck their economies.
One announcement addressed all of them: your oil will move, your ships will be covered, and the rates will be reasonable.
Yesterday I described a system with no TARP, no Fed equivalent, no backstop at global scale.
This may be the first attempt to build one in real time, during the crisis itself.
The actuarial blockade just met a sovereign counterparty.
๐จ BREAKING: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele is being praised for making his country's prisoners CLEAN UP THE BEACHES and BEAUTIFY El Salvador, instead of just sitting around in a building
THAT'S how you do it.
I truly admire what Bukele does to improve El Salvador! ๐บ๐ธ๐ธ๐ป
A timely reminder from Ricky Gervais.
Free speech is the right to criticise any ideas including religion.
Blasphemy style protections are ludicrous. That an all powerful deity must be protected from having its feelings hurt.
Ideas do not have rights! Only people do. Including the right to criticise any belief system without censorship.
Offense is the unavoidable price of true freedom.
โJust because your offended doesnโt mean your right.โ
โYou don't negotiate with someone who marches into another country, devastates it, killing whoever stands in his way. You get him out, you make him pay, and see that he is never in a position to do these things again.โ
I miss leaders with spines, unlike Keir Starmer.