When you don't have any logical replies, you can just block them and hide their replies.
So that everyone thinks no reply was ever given. 😭😭 atleast is age mein to aise kaam Shobha nahi dete.
@shivkant This is not about "out of you" or "no one" it's about defeat. Focus on that cuz I didn't quote exact phrase.
Shabdo ka maya jaal bunna mujhe bhi aata hai, "Did Gargi defeat Yagyavalkya?" cuz aapne original post mein to yahi likha hai but then u shifted to stalemate and now? 😭🙏
Krishna was about to break his vow not to take up arms in the war when Dharma demanded action.
Bhishma kept his vow, even as Dharma was violated before his eyes.
Krishna’s action was just to remind Bhishma : A vow is sacred only as long as it serves Dharma. When keeping it begins to protect Adharma, breaking it may become the higher duty.
#Mahabharat
your best ideas will never come from trying to have them. you must read more. do more. experience more. stack the inputs until your brain is overflowing with raw material. then do nothing. sit in silence. go for a walk. stare out a window. that's when your mind starts connecting dots you didn't know existed. the conversation from last week meets the book from last month meets the problem you've been chewing on for a year. until one random wednesday you look up and realize you found the answer you were looking for.
@shivkant This is not about "out of you" or "no one" it's about defeat. Focus on that cuz I didn't quote exact phrase.
Shabdo ka maya jaal bunna mujhe bhi aata hai, "Did Gargi defeat Yagyavalkya?" cuz aapne original post mein to yahi likha hai but then u shifted to stalemate and now? 😭🙏
@shivkant Gargi is saying "No one can defeat Yagyavalkya" and you are saying Yagyavalkya's answers were illogical. 😭😭
I don't want to discuss it further.
@shivkant And I can see you can't understand the meaning even though you have a good command of the language.
That's why you're just mincing words. Leave everything aside and prove me wrong using any source. Don't try to beat around the bush.
@shivkant First of all I am not saying Brahman = God(It's just a layman term, that's why i used it, cuz God is describable but Brahman is not)
Second thing, "Gods" got it.
I am resting my case here.
@shivkant Understanding Sanskrit and Vedic Sanskrit doesn't mean that you understand the meaning too. Both are different thing. And अनिर्वचनीयता is not abstraction it is something which can only be understood via logic, anology and examples cuz words aren't enough to describe it. ....
@shivkant So how can this be considered a victory for Nachiketa?
Third, you are simply drawing random conclusions that make no sense.
Fourth, challenging someone does not mean that you have defeated them.
@shivkant First of all, the dialogue between Nachiketa and Yama was not a debate. It was simply Nachiketa asking questions out of curiosity about death. So, there is no question of winning or losing.
Second, Yama answered all of Nachiketa’s questions. ....
@shivkant Brahma is beyond definitions. So, no thing, no words can describe Brahma. Words aren't enough to describe Brahma. To know Brahma you have to go beyond the limits of describable things. You have to become nothing, and once you become "Nothing" you will become "Everything".
@shivkant And one more thing, Brahma(God) can never be described. The one who says, "I have known Brahma," does not truly know Brahma. The one who says, "I do not know Brahma," is the one who truly knows Brahma. And this is the essence of all the Upanishads: "I know that I don't know." ...