EVIL: Fake Family Statements Following Migrant Crime
Article by Susanne Delaney
We simply MUST have a RICU MI6 operation (Research, Information and Communications Unit) within Ireland. It has been revealed RICU (a UK unit) prepares public statements that are passed off as being written by families of crime and terrorism victims (it is suspected victims' families are threatened heavily with legal consequences if they don't comply - they might be told "if there's riots, you'll be held to account").
So that odd statement you heard "from" Henry Nowak's father is not really from him. The incongruent sounding one you heard from the family of the Belfast attempted beheading and eye gouging is not really from them either.
It makes perfect sense then that the family statements [allegedly in the wake of Parnell Square stabbings] were not real either.
How many times did we get told the 5 year old child [who got stabbed in the heart and deprived of oxygen to the brain for 40 mins] was doing great? She was thriving we were told. Eating lots of cake for her birthday. Returning to school. Learning a lot. Smiling and laughing.
It was all disturbing lies. A psy-op.
Two and a half years on she is in a wheelchair. She cannot walk. She cannot talk. She blinks to communicate. She has dystonia (she has spasming and visual constant jerking of her muscles constantly). She eats through a tube. She also hardly ever sleeps. Her mother tries to convince her to. But it is almost like she is afraid to close her eyes. She cannot tell anyone her feelings about or process the horror she experienced that day. She is a prisoner in her own body and mind. Trapped with a real life bogeyman.
She was never doing great. She probably never will.
RICU writes stories for papers. It decides who says what and when.
Given the faked stories coming out of The Irish Times and other media about this little child, it makes sense they either have influence here (come on let's face it - the British never left, and it looks like Sinn Féin for one are in bed with them) or else there's a similar unit.
RICU is the strategic communications branch of the British government operating within the UK Home Office (under its Homeland Security Group).
RICU was created as part of Prevent, the UK's highly debated counter-radicalisation and counter-terrorism strategy.
RICU's primary official mission is to monitor extremist propaganda and counter radical ideologies online, but has faced intense scrutiny and Freedom of Information (FOI) requests regarding how it manages public narratives after high-profile or politically sensitive crimes in order to keep a lid on what is referred to as "simmering racial tensions".
The unit shapes the public sphere by controlling narratives and injecting specific messaging into family statements, such as heavy emphases on community cohesion, preventing civil division, or condemning localised unrest.
RICU uses "Black Propaganda" tactics like operating through third-party public relations and communications firms to distribute these government-approved messages (but government involvement is hidden).
RICU manipulates public sympathy and masks the true origin of the message, to make it seem grassroots (think the recent Belfast pro immigration protest), or seem like a statement came directly from a family (who always appear to call for calm following an incident in which their own family member was maimed or killed in some horrific manner).
By managing the words of grieving families during highly charged, controversial crimes, RICU's goal is to de-escalate and manage public outrage.
It weaponises personal tragedies to deflect from the fact that politicians not only have blood on their hands, they are drenched in claret at this point (visualise that scene in Carrie)—and are seemingly devoid of all morals and conscience (insisting your online commentary is the real problem, not the nightmarish attacks we are seeing unfold before our very eyes).
If the Irish government won't prioritise the Irish people, who will? Certainly not the governments of the countries so many are coming to Ireland's shores from. Nor should they.
It's a mystery why so many people opposed to any coherent sense of a nation enter national politics.
This is killing our future generations.
Oh you can badly smudge the issue with consumerist choice jargon where you treat children as if buying a product.
But this is still killing our future generations and it's nothing but it.
If I found out I was pregnant I'd be shocked and worried considering I'm one of the many young people who can't afford to buy a home
Instead of improving housing or trying to ease cost of living the Government are making it easier for me to abort my baby
Talk about priorities
@KezardIV Small correction, their generation saw being ‘not racist’ as a virtue. ‘Anti-racist’ is a woker, reverse- racist, activist outlook which these older fellows are also unlikely to hold.
The UK government is suddenly very concerned about protecting children when it involves digital ID and surveillance.
But when British children were being targeted by grooming gangs, they couldn’t care less.
It seems monitoring the public is more important than protecting them.
@MichaelPTKelly The same people who put objectionable material in kids’ schoolbooks are in favour of this social media ban. Concern for children is only a pretext.
When Nolan brought this up in the Dáil, FF said she was risking social cohesion.
Turns out accepting unwell people who are part of unwell cultures may be more of a risk to social cohesion than a TD talking about a national issue in the Dáil.
This statement really is beyond parody. There are so many examples, but this statement about the near-murder of their son/father etc contains the term 'our hospitality sector'
@CatholicCharm No, nothing like that. Saying that, Ireland was very, very safe up until a few years ago, and even the police did not routinely carry weapons other than a baton.
As a journalist, I embedded with multiple groups of migrants during 2015-16 "Syrian" wave (only about a third were fleeing the civil war in Syria, from my observation). I even lived in a smuggler's safe house in Istanbul, waiting for weather conditions to permit a dinghy crossing from Izmir to Lesbos.
I went into that experience basically an open-borders person and left a restrictionist. Merkel's flinging the gates to more than 1 million newcomers was madness, sheer madness.
Even if these were the most aspirational migrants imaginable --- and they weren't, gotta be honest --- the numbers, the cultural distance, and the conditions of European society should've prompted a rethink. But no. Wir schaffen das.
I tried to put myself in the shoes of native working classes in the transit countries (the Balkans, Hungary, etc.) and the recipients (Germany, Sweden, etc.). It was obvious that they would experience it as a cataclysm.
Even if most wouldn't become victims of crime, this many newcomers were bound to generate acute incohesion experienced at the street, social services, and housing levels, mostly burdening the native poor and those on the lower rungs of the labor market.
The engine of assimilation, not particularly robust in most of Europe to begin with, breaks down in the face of sheer numbers. In retrospect, I've come to believe that this was the single worst and most consequential decision taken by European leaders in the 21st century.
I don't understand it. I remember @DouglasKMurray telling me at the early stages that the best way to help was in-country, meaning humanitarian assitance in the Middle East and North Africa, not by bringing them over. He was 100% correct.
@Arcreonis@theblessedsalt As a Catholic, I pray daily, but I don’t pray that God would reveal to any individual whether a new work (eg the Quran, BofM) is scripture. That’s not the way Jesus left the church to work.