@ARanganathan72 Extra seats is also not the right idea. Those seats dont appear from thin air. It is just twisting of words to reserve the same seats in a different way. Every year some seats are added naturally, if you claim them for reservation, it is no different from original idea.
@AntiCommieBecca@randplaty But women are not selecting productive smart men right? They are going after their primal instincts of looks which has little relevance in a modern civilisation.
A young doctor in Surat, Gujarat, trained to save lives, was found dead in his hostel amid allegations of harassment, with four seniors suspended.
If even an educated, capable professional can be pushed to such vulnerability, we must ask: who protects men when they face harassment, abuse or injustice?
Men need a support system too.
Itโs time India seriously considers a National Commission for Men, a dedicated institution to ensure that no man facing injustice suffers in silence.
@CMOGuj@GujaratPolice@dgpgujarat@MoHFW_INDIA@NMC_IND@MoJ_India
@ChaosHubIN Dowry is only for access to high value man. If access to the man was not valuable, no woman would be paying dowry. You can only say you are buying the product if you pay whole net worth of the guy including the future. Generally, dowries are token amounts, 2-5cr for IAS grooms๐
Feminists 100 years from now:
Companies did not allow women to enter offices during periods. How misogynistic of them? Rapist and murderers can come to offices but women entering office in her period will ruin it? /s
A rapist or a murderer entering a temple and praying wonโt โruinโ your religion, but a woman entering a temple while on her period will? I donโt think even God would agree with a rule written by some misogynistic man.
@stayaway_002 No one justifies man's extramarital affairs. The man is shamed socially and punished legally by courts. Can't say the same for women legally.
I dont get why some people say reservation should not have a creamy layer. A poor SC/ST guy deserves reservation more than a rich SC/ST. Even if the rich SC/ST guy is disadvantaged on caste, the poor SC/ST guy is disadvantaged on caste and resources which compounds on itself.
I dont get why some people say reservation should not have a creamy layer. A poor SC/ST guy deserves reservation more than a rich SC/ST. Even if the rich SC/ST guy is disadvantaged on caste, the poor SC/ST guy is disadvantaged on caste and resources which compounds on itself.
Women in that ecosystem donโt report such harassment widely coz it might hurt the cause, while moral high horse riders, the ayatollahs of morality keep molesting.
@grok@NalinisKitchen@Neogibson@grok Dont quote biased DPA law to me. Does the lifestyle upgrade not include an imputed value transfer through a rent of a better house, cost of food, cost of travels when the man is the provider of the household?
@grok@NalinisKitchen@Neogibson@grok Why are you saying actual as if the woman's upgrade is somehow fictional? If women want a rich man pays a token amount for it, how is it unjust under the legal paradigm of consideration. No one forces women to get married and both parties get something valuable in the txn.
@grok@NalinisKitchen@Neogibson@grok So when women choose rich men, it is culture and practical but if rich men accept money for choosing one out of many options available to them, it is extraction and harassment?
The proviso in Section 3(2) is asymmetric by design: gifts from the bride's side to the groom face the extra "customary and not excessive" limit, while gifts to the bride do not. Section 4 already covers demands from either side, and both giving and taking are offences for any person.
The structure targets the historically dominant one-way extraction that produces the bulk of harassment and the ~5,700 dowry deaths recorded in 2024. Full gender neutrality is a policy choice for Parliament, not the courts.