@Ernest1588761 “Outlined”
As if non-legislative, ceremonial laws can “outline” anything.
How the fuck does a law that was never enforced “outline” anything, atheist retard.
Go ahead, why don’t you prove it was ever enforced first, then we can talk.
Oh! That’s right. It wasn’t enforced.
@SkyisFalling999@TheHistoryGuy07@maklelan Sure, chucklefuck. Still waiting for you to debunk the article. Since you lied about how it’s okay with Hebrew’s slave trade.
@SkyisFalling999@TheHistoryGuy07@maklelan Yeah, you are too retarded to read. Still waiting for you to make a single decent argument against that article. I know you can’t, because you’re a retard and you’re wrong. You also know Dan is retarded and wrong too, so yeah.
@SkyisFalling999@TheHistoryGuy07@maklelan Nice lie, fuck tard. Why don’t you actually debunk the argument that it critiques the slave trade, you atheist retard.
Or just admit you’re wrong, Dan is wrong, both of you are retards, and the Bible isn’t “proslavery”. Either or works.
@SkyisFalling999@TheHistoryGuy07@maklelan Oh really, retard? You implied that Revelation *only* condemns the Roman slave trade but it doesn’t condemn the Hebrew slave trade.
The fuck are you trying to say, retard?
I brought up an article Dan has never made a good argument against! So yeah, fuck off.
@SkyisFalling999@TheHistoryGuy07@maklelan Oh! And you have a shred of evidence that Revelation condoned slavery?
I mean, considering there are approximately zero proslavery verses in Revelation, I’m curious how you can evince that..
@athiestboi Ah, so atheists don’t know anything.
The Bible has tons of female prophets, leaders, influencers
Oh! And the Bible never tells women to “cover up” for men
Oh! And the Bible says that wives submit to their husbands.. right before saying husbands must submit to their wives. So yeah