Deleted in protest

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

Trustworthy Anonymity is now emerging as a legal right as state-af-the-art technology has caught up with legal requirements.

See EDPS IPEN Workshop in Digital Identity
https://t.co/Bo8SKmjTZg
("ansvar" is danish for responsibility)

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

I am shutting down my account.

After Elon took over, X had degraded to a place of political extremism, bots, and facist bias. Even worse after Trump took office.

Democracy needs defenders, but X has lost its way.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@sentdefender Why is it that I get association to Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact ?

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@Pepper_Rides @WouterRombouts2 @visegrad24 If Mexico demanded and invaded Texas, should you surrender Texas for peace?

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@DNikulin @vtchakarova What EU say and what EU do is not the same.

Rigid rules on top of systemic surveillance is double failure.

The question is if EU actually implement eIDAS 2.0 unlinkability, i.e. begin to design for citizen control

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@AnnCavoukian The word you are searching for is unlinkability.

The core requirement in EU eIDAS 2.0

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@mario_gug That will always constitute profiling and thus banned in EU

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

Collection of biometrics is anti-security because
a) It is an attack on the citizen
b) It cannot be protected
c) There are always better alternatives.

Don't go there - ever.

[Kohei Kurihara - Privacy for all together 🌍 @kuriharan]

Thank you for #like #privacy #tweet! @ManuPharswal @jeancayeux @t_nihonmatsu @sulefati7 @sekurprivate @ILoveBooks786 @mailspec @Jonesls @rvn1304 @RLDI_Lamy @AMontespan @NoRouteExplore

Facial recognition protects your #privacy?
https://t.co/aK7asutcAF

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@TheScoopUS @EndWokeness You guys are nuts, as are Trump.

If it was better to manufacture in the US, production would not have moved.

What happens now is that everybody loses, in the best case only inflation grow. There are other geopolitical agendas in the case of China, but not vs Canada.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@LBC The truth is literally the opposite (linkable id over more modern alternatives create ineffectiveness), but it would require a level of competence that this think tænk clearly does not possess.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@LBC Problem is that the claimed benefit is a lie - you do NOT get better public services from eliminating security and autonomy.

That is the false monopolist claim that monopolies produce cheaper. Over time, the loss of innovation and adaptability will make it much more expensive.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@ecb Perhaps woke up?

"(v)    taking measures to protect Americans from the risks of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), which threaten the stability of the financial system, individual privacy, and the sovereignty of the United States, .."
https://t.co/4p7CLMJXpu

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@minabird Great since TAPDF clearly was a bureaucratic monster without value.

What is even more important is that now eIDAS 2.0 unlinkability (art 5a.16) render consent invalid over designs that prevent personal data transfer to US cloud altogether.

[Aes🇺🇸 @AesPolitics1]

This guy is a fucking moron.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@ServidaAndrea Politely, the article is missing to key issue. If we want to neutralize the algorithmic control we need to starve them from access to data on people.

The key is eIDAS 2.0 unlinkability combined with DMA.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@EUdigitalID Problem is of course that technical implementation does not match legal requirements

The technical implementation of focus on use cases i Surveillance by Design.

The minimum legal requirement is unlinkability - essential for security and especially secure data sharing.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@ThreshedThought Fair enough. Discussion needed and Denmark, Norway, UK etc need to be involved.

But why does this warrant beginning to threaten and make sovereignity violating demands on a NATO ally that has been among the first to stand up every time since 9/11?

Might is not right.

[Blackrussian @Blackrussiantv]

Footage of the moment British Royal Navy warship HMS Chiddingfold reverses its stern(rear end) into the port side of HMS Bangor another minesweeper class warship that was moored in Bahrain.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

This is a very clear documentation how forces in EU undermine both market and democracy for the sake of bureaucracy and centralized control @Frontex fail.

Security Requirement: With eIDAS 2.0 unlinkable crossing of borders, i.e. ZERO collection of personal data incl. biometrics

[EDRi @edri]

Upload your biometric data to a database for pre-travel controls? Many of you say that you share our concerns about a new #EUTravelApp proposal, e.g. data protection risks.
📣 Have your say as part of the public consultation
⌛ Deadline tomorrow (Jan. 8)
https://t.co/fWu2cLiNJr

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@guy_herbert The problem is, of course, this is the entire BigTech problem. To restore markets, consumers need to be freed from BigTech control.

[Deleted in protest @Engbrg]

@guy_herbert Part of making markets work again is eliminating adtech target marketing, which has reversed markets - making the consumer the product.

When consumers are protected from tracking, marketing will work differently and thus will media markets