Eno

除了交易什么都不会

[Eno @Eno19988]

黄金平空了 实际是全仓2X
不知道hype上为什么显示25X
希望QQQ和SP500有个像样的反弹
留子弹开美股

[Eno @Eno19988]

全仓2X 代言人
可惜今晚纳指没插针到我的挂单

[Eno @Eno19988]

很久没写东西了
要是有什么不得不写的话
只能是BP的美股现货
整体给我的感觉就是正规
像接了个券商

交易系统是类似Var那种询价系统
坏处是有点差 没订单簿不习惯
好处是直连纳斯达克流动性

美股现货应该算企业护城河之一了
之前吹过的牛终于兑现
买的股票可以提现至券商
当然 券商的也可以充值进来

[Eno @Eno19988]

@jiajia_airdrop 刚睡醒错过了 100w 有 2yo 和她女朋友一份功劳

[Eno @Eno19988]

你还是不理解为什么积分是你
或者是backpack 团队的债务

如果你不能让债务
或者说让相信你的人受益
或者你继续冷眼旁观不作为
你将无法还债

fud 的根源是信任债
不是恐惧 不是代币的波动
更不是什么人性
是信任危机导致的 pvp

[Armani Ferrante @armaniferrante]

On FUD.

FUD is an opportunity to either address misunderstandings or to identify mistakes and simply fix them. With every TGE, emotions run hot, as people focus on a single number, the token price, determining one’s feelings. It’s human nature, and because Backpack has such a large community around the world, spanning from advanced traders in Asia, to wallet users on every network, Mad Lad holders around the world, and everyone in between, the TGE is a time where people vocalize their views.

I would like to address several different topics I’ve seen floating around over the past few days to set the record straight and offer my perspective.

- OTC. I can’t believe I have to say this, no, we aren’t OTCing our own tokens to cash out. See the tokenomics. Fake news. End of story. What is true: buyers reached out to me and asked for OTC. I am happy to help buyers find more tokens. Unfortunately, due to the bad history of other crypto projects using OTC to cash out, folks assumed the worst when they saw me post about OTC in discord.

- Mad Lads. All existing Mad Lad holders pre-TGE retain their Backpack VIP status. New holders do not. Some like this, some hate this. I understand both perspectives. My perspective is that Mad Lads has always been an evolution alongside Backpack. We went from the whitelist games inside Backpack => pre-reveal inside Backpack => reveal boss inside Backpack => xNFT inside Backpack => airdrops inside Backpack => VIP points inside Backpack => the BP token. Each one of these stages created a clear path for Mad Lads to get to the next stage, always focusing on long term holders over people that come and go. There are people that follow the path, and people that do not. There are people that evolve with us and people that do not. Our approach from the day Mad Lads was born has always been to focus people on the Backpack product. Naturally, new people came into Mad Lads with their own pre-conceived notion of what it was or what it should be. This creates tension. But we have always had a strong vision and we will always stick to it. The people that use the product always get to the next stage, where every stage answers a single question: how do we push Backpack forward. When designing token utility, it’s a question of economics, and it would be a disservice to BP to not align incentives around it. There’s an additional nuance worth pointing out: Backpack is different from basically every other product that dropped a mined token because we KYC users and are selective about the regions we open up. Those users have been out of the game, so to speak, not because I want to do that–nothing upsets me more than not being able to serve users in a particular region (what founder would want that?)--but it’s because we have chosen the path of building a crypto native financial institution. That path is long and hard. For these users, we have maintained the path to get to the next stage and have communicated that. When we open up regions, these regions will get their drops, and we will be running new campaigns to get more drops just by using the product, and that brings everyone up to speed with the same VIP benefits of the original pre-TGE seasons. For the long term holders, nothing has changed. The key issue is with respect to new NFT holders. Some people will hate this. Some will think it’s sound economics. I understand both perspectives. We are doing what we think is best.

- Sybills. Our goal was to protect retail users competing for points against sophisticated players splitting accounts and giving themselves an unfair advantage over those that don’t. The mistake we made: our process was too black and white. From the team’s point of view, we had a line and we stuck to it. From the community’s point of view, the line is nuanced. We did not sufficiently take that into consideration.

- Price/FDV. With every token comes the human nature to think about the price at all times. There are good ways to think about price and there are clearly illegal ways to think about price. Our position is simple, we are building over a long period of time, and we are not making short term decisions. 24h post-TGE FDV is not a meaningful metric. Even 1 week post-TGE FDV is not a meaningful metric. If you ask anyone that’s ever built anything, they’ll tell you the same. Many people will take issue with that statement, and that’s ok. Ultimately, you have to look at our incentives and decide for yourself. The fact of the matter is that the team and I are incentivized to make Backpack a success with arguably the most extreme tokenomics ever created. What happens if the token goes to zero and stays there? Our company fails, and we get nothing. Some people might rebut saying that we get rich from the company revenue. No. That is simply not how companies work. We don’t get rich from a bad token price. We are punished in the most extreme possible way. And we are rewarded in the most extreme way only if we achieve all of our hopes and dreams. The way it should be. This is by design. Beyond this post you won’t see me talk about price or FDV. You will see me talking about building and creating long term value. And it’s only by doing that, can BP become a success.

Every project goes through trials and tribulations. This is certainly a moment for us. We are nothing without our community, and we will serve it in the best way we know how. I have complete conviction, I am all in, and the team is all in. Don’t trust us, look at the tokenomics to decide for yourself.

Thank you for reading this. Thank you especially to those that have supported us this week. It means a lot. We will continue to review the above, particularly the cases around sybils, and get back to building.

[Eno @Eno19988]

@anymose @meihua_7 阿玛尼收到你送的这本书后
紧急学习中文
只学会了前四个大字

[Eno @Eno19988]

@ulagik @leoding0806x @Backpack @armaniferrante 公正 客观 务实

[Eno @Eno19988]

A community is not built with cheap entries.

It’s built with time, trust, and shared values.

大家确实会“getting tired”
但大家一直选择 “trust me bro”

在 bp 认识了很多朋友
一起经历各种事情
也建立起了无比珍贵的信任
这是唯一重要的东西

[Elika @KgnCnKhrmn]

https://t.co/8EmGXbUfae

[Eno @Eno19988]

@KgnCnKhrmn A community is not built with cheap entries.
It’s built with time, trust, and shared values.

说到我心坎里去了 兄弟

[Eno @Eno19988]

@ahbooe_lee 당신의 생각을 이해합니다, 행운이 있기를 바랍니다.

[Eno @Eno19988]

@Metabape @0xesody @Backpack 想起来那天我从便利店回来 门口看到你跟美国朋友坐上车 人脉真的广

[Eno @Eno19988]

@0xpeas @Web3Feng 🙃

[jiajia_airdrop🐻🎒 @jiajia_airdrop]

昨天申诉通道开放之后，今天终于在@Backpack 团队复核后拿回了之前被女巫扣掉的代币。

简单说下我自己的情况，也给大家一个参考：

我这边确实有两个账号，而且中途有过租用NFT的行为，这也是被判定为女巫的主要原因。

最早用的是对象注册的账号，当时刚接触，不太懂规则，也没有填写邀请人，所以一直没有手续费返还。后面才重新注册了一个新号来正常使用。

另外，当时也不了解规则，短时间租用过NFT，这个行为触发了系统的集群判定，最终被识别为女巫。

后面我自己用的大号，是直接在市场购买NFT进行正常交易的，这部分一直是正常的，也顺利拿到了空投。

说实话，昨天一整天都挺焦虑的，反复在想是不是就这样没了。
但今天真的收到了补发的代币，还是挺激动的。

所以也想跟大家说一句：
如果你是被误判的，一定要去申诉，把自己的实际情况如实写清楚，确实是有机会拿回来的。

申诉表格链接：https://t.co/9SCz9IJhog

最后也感谢团队愿意开放申诉通道，给大家一个重新审核的机会。

感谢@Miiiho420 @CryptoPikachu

[Eno @Eno19988]

最后一条推文

背包跟了一年多 认识了很多有趣的朋友 熬了很多夜 心血都在上面

我没被女巫 但市场环境很差 空投无法保本 这其实也无所谓 做交易嘛 盈亏自负 我也玩得起

但我确实无法接受有朋友“1011补偿的积分被女巫”这件事

共情力太强 代入就会觉得很命苦😭😭

回归骑手和二级交易生活 祝好

[Eno @Eno19988]

@0Xlynn03 对

[Eno @Eno19988]

@0Xlynn03 看了一下 我也是挂单

[Eno @Eno19988]

@redstar_hx 换手太多 被连带了 我们自己知道租这回事 项目方那边就是觉得多号用一个 就都是一个人 一刀切了

[Eno @Eno19988]

没被女巫 平安落地
独创打法在设计之初就考虑到多方面的情况
1011资金依旧安全

不跨所+纯现货双重对冲+24小时持仓产生利息+不高频交易+高效积分+隔离/一号一梯+自己买的NFT+不自成交+不半场开香槟=安全落地

🎒

[Eno @Eno19988]

@jiajia_airdrop 小叶好像也是那个 nft