@MKJ9792@BrysonGray Ok… he can challenge any claims she will officially make
You can’t pull up a podcast clip when someone might have been hyperbolic to make a point
@ckfkfkskksymid@robnoerr@RealCandaceO If something has 20% chance then it’s much more likely than something which has a 1% chance.
That doesn’t mean the odds of it are overwhelming.
@CatilloEthan@paleochristcon This was before the tweet im referencing, and no even here she didn’t mean he couldn’t ask her about her theories and challenge her on them.
@paleochristcon You wrote the evidence against Tyler was overwhelming.
Why are you now saying “I will take the position that the evidence is more compelling that Tyler was a lone shooter”
Also when someone speaks on a podcast you need to confirm if they were being literal or hyperbolic.
@paleochristcon The difference is Candace doesn’t need her theories to be anything more than viable. That’s how an investigation works. She’s allowed to explore various theories without proving them.
You agree with the state and call the evidence against Tyler Robinson overwhelming.