ErenM

[bu/ac @buperac]

So the guy that trooned his own kid and is family friends with the worlds most notorious child sex trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell, wants to tell me how to raise my kids.

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@WeAreCanProud What contributions?

[Canada Proud @WeAreCanProud]

🚨 ALERT: The new Carney Liberal Safe Social Media Act gives the government the power to regulate digital content related to 50 issues.

None of these "issues," however, are defined in the bill itself, and the actual decision to define these things goes down to Mark Carney and his regulators.

Among these "issues" is content that causes "significant psychological or physical harm."

What does "physical harm" over the internet even mean?

The bill doesn't answer that. It gives Mark Carney and his cabinet the sole power to decide what this means.

Do you think Carney would abuse these powers the moment he gets them?

[Jeff Brown @JeffBrownEnreal]

UPDATE OF MY LAWSUIT WITH THE TORONTO STAR FOR FAILING TO PUBLICLY REVEAL INFORMATION SHARED BY THE RCMP RE: JUSTIN TRUDEAU AND CHILD PORN. (Request by the Toronto Star for more time to file their defence)

HERE IS THE AMENDED PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM THAT THEY WILL DEFEND: https://t.co/jTRfTb2Iy5

@joe_warmington @mario4thenorth @TreyYingst @alexbruesewitz @rebelnews @DreaHumphrey @AlexpiersonAMP @CandiceMalcolm @KatieHalperShow @michaeltaube @dsimieritsch @vesperdigital @CarymaRules @Mazelit_ @ChrisWickNews @HausdorffMedia @NatashaMontreal

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@LionAdvocacy @lilbirdysaid Wonderful news🙌

[HoCStaffer @HoCStaffer]

What's worse than a Liberal Bill targeting online content?

One that doesn't set out the rules in the Bill so Parliament can debate their merits.

Instead it gives Cabinet the power over 19 decisions & a Liberal-appointed "Digital Safety Commission" 31 more.

Bill C-34 is worse than we thought. 🧵

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!

Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)

Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.

The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.

many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.

Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.

[John-Paul Berg @SemperVeritasX]

Bill C-2 → Warrantless sharing of your digital information at the border.
Bill C-22 → Mandatory data retention, government backdoors in every app and service, and mass metadata collection on all Canadians.
Bill C-8 → Federal power to control, throttle, or shut down cyber systems, networks, and critical infrastructure.
Bill C-9 → Vague “hate” definitions weaponized to criminalize dissent.
Bill C-11 → Direct government regulation of what you can see and share online.
Bill C-63 → The “digital safety” trap that lets them police your thoughts, speech, and online life — with prison as the penalty.
Bill C-34 → The digital "Safety" Act, This is an age restriction on internet access, which alows them to force everyone to upload government issued ID for internet access.

This has NOTHING to do with safety and everything to do with control.

With NO democratic mandate to lead, and a majority government assembled through backroom deals far from public scrutiny, Mark Carney is changing our country into something unrecognizable. This is totalitarianism.

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@Reil76 @Autumblues @Vybrance Now just imagine having to share your ID with every social media platform or any other website the government determines needs age verification. Are you comfortable having to provide that to foreign owned companies? How secure are they?

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@Reil76 The difference being that you’re not forced to provide that ID to access the internet under the guise of ‘safety’. This will erase anonymity & combined with other proposed bills everything you say or do on the internet can then be used against you.

[David Leis🇨🇦Leaders on the Frontier, TV, Podcast @LeadersFrontier]

"Treason."

That's the word LCol. (Ret.) David Redman uses when talking about Canada's immigration policies.

A serious accusation—and he explains exactly why.

Watch the full episode on YouTube.
https://t.co/LKapU6Ne7q

@FrontierCentre @DavidRe09886944

[BLACK DUMPLING™ @BlackDumpling]

They sent heavily armored British police. Sent them in force. Sent them with cannons.

Not to stop the grooming gangs. Not to stop the stabbings, the gougings, the decapitations. Not to stop the slaughter of children.

No, they were sent to stop you from talking about them.

Consider.. for decades these self same officers knew little British girls were being subjected to some of the most horrific abuse possible. And did nothing. Stood down. Looked the other way.

But now word's gotten out. Now there's discussion. Now there's concern. Now the natives are realizing that the whole children getting knifed thing isn't nearly as rare as they were told. Constantly.

Keep in mind these police know the Northern Irish have tried petitions, tried elections, tried lawsuits. They have tried every legal means they could conceive of, every legal means possible. And even when Northern Irish won the Government just went ahead and did it anyway.

As a species humans don't have a word in any language to describe a game that's rigged in such a manner that the opposition only plays it to show you how much they can cheat, get away with it, and call themselves the winner just to demoralize you so you give up and stop playing altogether.

These police know this too. They know about the grooming gangs and the violations, and the corruption. They know all of this. Every single one of those "police officers" knows their own leaders and their fellow officers turned a blind eye when a little girl had her tongue nailed down to make it easier to violate her.

I mean just ask yourself. How much would they have to pay you to turn a blind eye to that kind of child violation?

Because we know how much the average cop makes in the UK and it's nothing to brag about. Yet they show up to work anyway. They collect a paycheck anyway. And they don't care about your human rights, or ethics, or good and evil. They don't share your lofty virtues. They do what they're told.

Because, and I want to make this painfully clear, these are not your countrymen. They are not your friends or fellow citizens.

These policemen are the enforcement arm of an occupational government that will kill you as soon as listen to you choke out on your own blood as they cuff you. They won't think twice. They will shed no tears.

Are these men the enemy of the People? I'll let you decide. But I'm pretty comfortable saying they aren't your friends.

And they are definitely not legitimate. They're just men with clubs given permission.

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

I had to read this three times before I could believe it was real.

Rotherham. A small town in northern England.

For sixteen years, at least 1,400 children — some as young as eleven — were raped, gang-raped, and trafficked between cities by organized groups of men.

Eleven years old.
Petrol was poured on them so they would stay quiet.
Their families were threatened with death.
Photos were taken and used as blackmail.

The police knew.
The council knew.
The social workers knew.

For sixteen years, not one of them moved.

Why?
Because officers were afraid of being called racist if they acted on what they were seeing.
That was the whole reason.
While children were being sold, adults were protecting their own reputations.

That is the moment something in you breaks.

And here is the part that makes it worse.

The TV networks did not report it. The papers did not chase it.
When the journalist Andrew Norfolk finally broke the story, even he thought maybe 150 girls had been hurt.
The real number was 1,400.
He was staggered.

This should have been the biggest story of the decade. It was not.
The networks looked away. The advertisers preferred safer topics.
The cover-up did not end when the report was published — it continued in the silence of every newsroom that refused to chase it.

Then Elon Musk bought X.

The advertisers fled.
The press declared the platform finished.
X almost did not survive.

But it did.

And on X, the names of those towns started trending.
Rotherham.
Telford.
Rochdale.
Oldham.

Towns the country had been told to forget.

Britain understands itself differently today.
Not because the politicians confessed.
Not because the broadcasters apologized.
Because one platform refused to let it stay buried.

X almost did not survive.
1,400 children almost stayed forgotten.

That is worth saying out loud.

[Michelle Rempel Garner @MichelleRempel]

Here is a list of powers Liberal Bill C34 proposes to give to cabinet and a new regulator over what content Canadians can see and interact with online.

Cabinet will be able to designate new categories of regulated online services without Parliamentary debate.

(Source @mgeist)

[The Kevin Downey, Jr. Show Mon- Fri. 9-11 am EST! @KDJRadioShow]

After allowing years of Muslim crimes against Irish people, the cops have donned riot gear to beat their own.

[Queen Bee @KingBobIIV]

He's not bothered about child sexual exploitation on Pornhub, OnlyFans, Roblox, or any of the countless platforms where children are groomed, abused, and exploited. He's not demanding tougher sentences for predators. He's not demanding the closure of sites that profit from sexual content children can access. He wasn't particularly interested when the BBC spent decades covering for prolific celebrity nonces or when LBC parade around government psyop whore Bonnie Blue.

What he cares about is @X.

Because X is where people get news, compare notes, share evidence, and discover that what is happening in one town is happening in another. From Penzance to Portugal - we are one.

The pretence is that this is about "misinformation" and "encitement", but the actual target is the means by which ordinary people communicate with each other.

They've tried destroying our pubs and our churches and communities - where we congregate and talk and unite. But we found somewhere else, so that has to be destroyed too.

What they forget is that the British were organising long before mobile phones, the internet, social media, television, radio, or newspapers.

For a thousand years we organised rebellions, uprisings, protests, petitions, and resistance movements armed with little more than word of mouth, churchyards, market squares, pubs, and messengers on horseback.

The Iceni managed it.

The Cornish managed it.

The Levellers managed it.

The Chartists managed it.

The people who fought the Romans, the Vikings, the Normans, and every other power that tried to impose itself upon them managed it.

If people are angry enough, they will find each other.

They always have.

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@eduardomenoni Imagine if they put this much effort in to keep illegals out of their country.

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@CapatanEl4662 Canada😊

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@Piers_Corbyn Yes!!

[ErenM @ErenM78]

In lockstep Australia, Canada and the UK are implementing or introducing social media bans for under 16.
This isn’t an organic movement to protect youth.

[Glenn Meder @GlennMeder]

🚨 THIS ISN’T ABOUT “PROTECTING KIDS.”
IT’S ABOUT FORCING A DIGITAL ID ON EVERYONE — AND KILLING YOUR PRIVACY FOR GOOD.

Keir Starmer’s “Australian-plus” crackdown sounds innocent: age verification, intimate-image blockers, feature bans and VPN restrictions for under-16s.

But here’s the truth they won’t say out loud...

To enforce this, EVERY USER — kid or adult — will have to prove who they are online. Facial scans. Government ID uploads. Biometric checks. A permanent digital trail tied to your real identity.

This is online digital ID by stealth.

And the UK is just the start. This is coming to every country, including the USA.

If you’re done being treated like a suspect in your own country…

If you refuse to hand over your privacy so a failing government can control what you see and say…

Follow me.

I expose the surveillance state they’re rushing through while everyone’s distracted by the “think of the children” script. Raw truth. No filters. No surrender.

Our fight for freedom starts online.

Don’t let them flip the switch.

Follow now.

Share this.

Wake up.🔥

[ErenM @ErenM78]

@JeanRomanik @FoxNews @libsoftiktok @catturd2 @GavinNewsom @KarenBassLA @ChadBianco @nypost @NickJFreitas @nickshirleyy They will do nothing.