The amount of lifestyle evangelism that gets conflated with dating tips is staggering. “Women love it when a man can tie them up.” Thanks for the info I guess.
@SpeaksNanda Well no. If you are pro sex work you would probably require extremely firm boundaries against exploitation that aren’t the norm globally unfortunately.
Thinking that there is no distinction between more or less ethical forms of consumption and being pro sex work is a pretty eyebrow raising combination of beliefs.
@missphavin I dunno, it’s a good sentiment but has a ring of “pretending not to notice obvious differences between people.” Being neutral about differences is the most ideal but also has it’s own problems for implementation.
@naiveaigal@AdrienBoieldieu@anarchoboognish If you think there is *no* circumstance where someone is trying for a child can have an abortion permissibly, you are definitely not pro-abortion.
@mbolotnikova It’s actually shocking to that slaughter is so widely accepted. Surely most slaughter method are viscerally wrong and would never be accepted for killing pets.
@moriah_bridges @PhilipMPowell@Romy_Holland Seems impossible to think otherwise as long as we have any belief in morals at all. Morals are there to guide behaviors. If a fact about our agency causes something like blameworthy-ness to not apply, then morals must just be something different.
@brachel31el What’s the difference between advocating for reduction or abolition? It’s the same arguments against Meat either way and you have the additional burden of being less morally consistent if you advocate reduction.
@hecubian_devil Not every statement needs to have a caveat for obscure groups of people. Special interest groups that make everything about them are a bad tendency on the left.