Essential Patent

The source for standard-essential and other patent litigation issues. Content may include attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcome

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

DOJ Business Review Letter of University Tech. Licensing Program for Non—SEPs https://t.co/UVWs088Pip

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Judge Gilstrap Preliminarily Enjoins Samsung From Using Chinese Case To Interfere With U.S. Case (Ericsson v. Samsung) https://t.co/QXjmTO3hsI

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Ninth Circuit to Hear Argument Feb. 13 from FTC, DOJ and Qualcomm on Competition Law's Applicability to SEP Licensing (FTC v.Qualcomm) https://t.co/og28ra7YB4

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

U.S. Patent Office, U.S. Dept. of Justice And NIST Issue Joint Statement on SEP Remedies https://t.co/FWPIUWyfal

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Federal Circuit rules SEP owner entitled to jury trial on royalty for past unlicensed use of SEP (TCL v. Ericsson) https://t.co/f8oLx2A7fz

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Public invitation to the Competition Brawl (FTC v. Qualcomm) https://t.co/jBqt8a9Atc

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Judge Gilstrap rules Ericsson's licensing offers were FRAND—compliant (HTC v. Ericsson) https://t.co/gjUU3vGCqG

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Judge Koh rules that Qualcomm violated FTC Act (FTC v. Qualcomm) https://t.co/zmpVs64bY5

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

FTC Staff throws shade on DOJ Statement of Interest (FTC v. Qualcomm) https://t.co/eaLdzSYIj1

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

U.S. Dept. of Justice poised to provide leadership in FTC v. Qualcomm case https://t.co/gTW3lX1N7X

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

FTC v. Qualcomm: Part One–Where is Denzel? https://t.co/K6BI0rMNGl

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Jury awards running royalty for willfully infringed SEPs subject to FRAND commitment (Optis v. Huawei) https://t.co/HsZR87HIpr

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Federal Circuit provides guidance on implied waiver defense applied to failure to disclose foreign patent application to SDO (Core Wireless v. Apple) https://t.co/20Zgn6uqaw

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Judge Mitchell rules there are factual issues whether patent is essential to a standard (Cellular Eqpt v. ZTE) https://t.co/HLsfWMFFaS

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Judge Orrick enjoins Huawei from enforcing injunction for infringing SEPs issued by China's Shenzhen court (Huawei v. Samsung) https://t.co/S0zafiAKDx

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Waiver and estoppel bar enforcement of undisclosed drug manufacturing patent (Momenta v. Amphastar) https://t.co/pSGVyl3lvn

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

ALJ Lord dismisses SEP licensing-based patent misuse defenses (ITC Inv. No. 1081, Philips v. Feit Electric) https://t.co/uV0H6jLWgL

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Judge Gilstrap rejects patent misuse defense to alleged FRAND-committed SEPs (St. Lawrence v. Motorola Mobility) https://t.co/Exu19OXZM0

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

Webinar: What does U.S. case law tell us about standard essential patent licensing https://t.co/Bnc2fPprwW

[Essential Patent @EssentialPatent]

ITC rules that Fujifilm's patents were not essential to the LTO-7 Standard (337-TA-1012 Fujifilm v. Sony) https://t.co/jE4FmMthnA