6/8: Catches what agreement misses 🛑
A deliberately broken judge still hits ≈0.45 human Spearman — yet fails weak monotonicity (12.5%). Known failure mode: aggressive α-renaming scores 0.399 vs ≥0.849 for milder rewrites. Judges key on surface strings the kernel ignores.
I wanted to understand post-training by actually doing it‼️
So I took a Qwen2.5-0.5B base model and walked through SFT, DPO, and GRPO, with notes on how these methods fit into the post-training pipeline.
Hopefully I can teach you something: https://t.co/UIverijNBw
Reproduced CLIP from scratch for ~$5 💸
Two pretrained encoders (ResNet and DistilBERT), symmetric InfoNCE loss, 40 epochs on Flickr30k. It was a cool experience
Blog post: https://t.co/J2F2WjMjy1
Check it out!