Olivia
Online
A.P.N. (All Purpose Nerd)
@Evanmporter2
On here for following crypto
Joined July 2021
305 Following
100 Followers
6.6K Posts
22½ years of home inspections and this is still a first.
Nice Cypress neighborhood. Clean lawns. Expensive cars. Then you open the side gate…
A fully working toilet. Sitting outside. In the grass. With its own vent stack.
They even plumbed it correctly.
I don’t even know what to say.
What are we doing out here?
Feminism did NOT liberate women.
What liberated women was TECHNOLOGY and BIRTH CONTROL.
Washing machine liberated you more than feminism ever did.
Our mothers spent 15 hours a week washing clothes with their hands.
Washing machine came and freed her.
Fridge freed her. She no longer had to go to market every day.
Gas cooker freed her. No more 3 hours blowing firewood smoke into her eyes.
Electricity freed her.
And BIRTH CONTROL freed her. She could finally choose when to have children, how many to have.
Not feminism. TECHNOLOGY.
Feminism just CAME and took the credit.
Feminism told you "we fought for you so you can work." LIE.
Capitalists wanted you to work. They needed double workers to double their profits.
They needed to crash wages. What better way than to bring all women into the workforce at once?
Before, one man's salary could buy a house and feed a family of 5.
Now, husband and wife both work and they still cannot afford rent. Who won? Not you. The capitalist.
Feminism also told you casual sex is empowerment.
Who benefits from free sex? Is it you that is crying after being used and dumped? Or is it the man who got sex without paying bride price, without commitment, without responsibility?
The orgasm gap will tell you. In casual sex, men cum 90% of the time, women 30%. So who is empowered?
Feminism didn't liberate the average woman. It liberated the rich man.
He got your cheap labor in the office and your free sex in the bedroom.
And you are on Instagram calling it freedom.
When Will Ferrell and Jeff Goldblum went live with SNL's "Space: The Infinite Frontier with Harry Caray" sketch, the first part was scripted and on cue cards for both actors, but halfway through, Ferrell started improv'ing insane questions and you can see Goldblum holding on for dear life answering them 😂 I forget how good this era of SNL really was
This might be the most honest thing a woman has ever said about why wives try to change their husbands. Alison Armstrong worked it out herself only recently. The second she pairs with a man, she starts a program to fix him, because she's driven to be perfect, and his visible weaknesses make her lose admiration. But underneath that is something sneakier. 'I want you to get good at it so I don't have to carry the weight of it. I want you perfect at everything so I'm let off the hook for the very things you married me for.' Read that again. Sometimes the push to fix you isn't about you falling short. It's about her getting out of what she signed up to carry.
Every atheist I've debated eventually lands here: if God is real, why can't we see him? I used to fumble this. Then I read 1 Timothy 1:17.
Paul is mid-argument about grace and his own conversion when he breaks suddenly into praise:
"Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honour and glory for ever and ever."
"Eternal," "immortal," and "the only God" make sense as praise. But invisible? We don't praise men for being unseen. Why does Paul list it as something as glorious as the majesty and immortality of God?
Unless invisibility is not a limitation. Unless it is out of gracious design.
Paul met the unmediated light of Christ on the road to Damascus, he was knocked into the dirt, and blind for three days. He knows what the alternative to invisible feels like. It produced collapse, not worship. His praise is a survivor's testimony.
When people ask for God to be visible, they don't understand what full divine visibility would actually require.
God is omnipresent in essence. Therefore, total divine visibility fundamentally requires omnipresent visibility.
If God reveals Himself to the fullest extent of His capacity, He must be visible everywhere, at all times.
In the room you closed the door to. In the moment you spent your life believing nobody was watching. A visible, omnipresent God is not majestic; He is psychologically catastrophic. Nobody wants this, not even the devout.
Look at Isaiah 6. The prophet sees merely the hem of God's garment filling the temple, not the full glory of God, just the overflow. His response? "Woe to me, I am undone." A partial glimpse unmade him completely.
God isn't after bland empirical agreement. James already ended that: the demons believe, and tremble.
Intellectual assent is a bar the devil clears daily.
God isn't running a census of the convinced; He is seeking genuine love. And genuine love requires genuine choice, which requires that the object of love not be overwhelming.
This is why women despise love bombing. A man who floods your psychological space until refusal becomes impossible isn't loving you, he is eliminating the conditions for love. The "yes" he extracts is engineered by exhaustion.
God does the exact opposite. He veils His glory precisely so that you retain the dignity of saying no. The love bomber makes himself so large that you have no choice. God makes Himself small enough that you do.
Which brings us directly to the Incarnation.
The Incarnation is God making Himself visible enough to be known, but small enough to be rejected without fuss.
It is the most precise solution to the most precise problem: God doesn't arrive as a sky-filling terror, but as a baby in a manger in a backwater town. You can walk past a carpenter from Nazareth. You cannot walk past the throne of Isaiah 6.
The Bible is already clear that every knee will bow, a day of compelled reality as certain as the sun. But God is not eager for a forced crowd. Right now, He is seeking the single, freely given return of a heart in love.
When an atheist asks why he cannot see God, he is asking a better question than he knows. The answer is not absence. The answer is restraint.
Now one can finally understand why Paul says INVISIBLE, and means it as highest acclaim. It is not a limitation, it is a mercy.
These are the WNBA All-Stars. 😂
I could seriously pick any high school boys basketball team in the country to play against them, and they'd probably win by 50 points!
I was told by Coach Karl on this app these women could beat some NBA guys 😂😂😂
This is the all star game, this is the BEST women ball players in the world and they playing like this?? 🤦🏻♂️
They thought they could play a “No D” version of the All Star game like the NBA does but all it did was expose the very low level of actual offensive abilities possessed by most of the league.
The WNBA All-Star Game, where the best talent in the league is on display...
304 stainless is not resistant to acid or salt. So it’ll leech nickel.
Thinking back to the factory I worked at, 100% of our piping and mixers were 316 stainless. We weren’t allowed anything else
Now I’m looking at my kids cups. We allow Liquid IV if they’re running around outside and sweaty. My toddler doesn’t really get juice but still something we started looking for. Everything on Amazon is 304
In joining the 76ers, LeBron is joining the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 89th leading scorers in the NBA in Brown, Maxey, Embiid, and Edgecombe respectively. 🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️
Uncut Hoops uses a BRILLIANT cross-era comparison to show what it would look like if 2001 Jordan and 2013 Kobe did the same thing, ultimately showing how laughably shameless LeBron is when it comes to stacking teams.
Watch the whole video "LeBron James WILL NEVER CATCH Michael Jordan" here: https://t.co/Iro6LFWvu7 Like & sub to Uncut Hoops.
It’s over! We have the PROOF. LeBron James signing with Philadelphia has revealed who he truly is at his core. A mercenary. The history is now undeniable.
- When he couldn’t lead a team to a championship, he had Dwyane Wade do it for him on a superteam. On his way out, Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert accused him of quitting in a playoff series, saying “Go back and look at the tape”. Gilbert called him a quitter.
- When that superteam got old, he joined another in Cleveland, prompting Miami President Pat Riley to say “This stuff is hard. And you've got to stay together if you've got the guts. You don't find the first door and run out of it”. Riley said he had no guts.
- When Kyrie abandoned him, and realized that he couldn’t win without him, he bolted to LA, and lost until Anthony Davis saved him. Last season it was revealed in a report that Jeanie Buss had grew frustrated by his "outsized ego" and power within the franchise. — Rob Pelinka this offseason then allowed LeBron to save face, by pretending it was his decision to leave the franchise, so he bolted back East where he has an easier path to a championship next to three other All NBA players and one of last season’s rookie of the year candidates. Buss called him an ego-maniac.
An outsized ego, with no guts, who is a quitter. Their words, not mine.
Now this final move proves what everyone has said all along — He ain’t Jordan and he ain’t Kobe Bryant. He’s a mercenary, an opportunist, and he’s proven time and time again, when the going gets tough, LeBron packs his bags and runs away.
Don’t take my word for it, take it from the people who led the franchises that he played with; Dan Gilbert, Pat Riley, and Jeanie Buss — In their own words.
LeBron James never lacked the talent…….He lacked heart.
⚡️The entire twentieth century may have been an anomaly.
For roughly a hundred years, humans believed wealth came primarily from labor.
Go to school.
Get credentials.
Get a job.
Climb the ladder.
Buy a house.
Retire.
That wasn’t an eternal law.
It was a temporary equilibrium created by industrial capitalism, cheap energy, expanding demographics, and human labor being the dominant source of cognition.
That equilibrium is ending.
Labor is losing its monopoly on intelligence.
Once intelligence itself becomes industrialized, the center of gravity shifts.
The scarce resource is no longer effort.
It is ownership.
Ownership of energy.
Ownership of compute.
Ownership of data.
Ownership of capital.
Ownership of networks.
Ownership of scarce physical assets.
Ownership compounds.
Labor increasingly rents.
That single inversion explains almost everything people think are separate crises.
Housing.
AI.
Political polarization.
Credential inflation.
Falling birthrates.
Loneliness.
Crypto.
Bond markets.
Private equity.
Even the culture wars.
They are all downstream of one structural transition.
Civilization is moving from an economy where people sold labor to one where people either own productive systems or live inside them.
That realization is why so many institutions suddenly feel unstable.
They were built for a world where human labor was the irreplaceable factor.
That world is disappearing.
The second thought is darker.
The greatest wealth transfer of the next fifty years will not happen because AI replaces jobs.
It will happen because AI increases the returns to owning capital while reducing the returns to selling labor.
That is a much bigger event.
The third thought is the one that almost nobody seems willing to confront.
History isn’t converging toward equality.
History keeps oscillating between concentration and diffusion.
Every great technology begins by concentrating power.
Printing concentrated literacy.
Steam concentrated industry.
Electricity concentrated manufacturing.
Computing concentrated information.
AI is concentrating cognition.
Only later does diffusion occur.
People assume the diffusion phase is automatic.
It isn’t.
It has to be fought for.
The final thought is the one that never leaves.
The question of this century isn’t whether AI becomes intelligent enough.
It almost certainly will.
The question is:
Who owns the intelligence after it arrives?
That feels like the real axis around which everything else quietly rotates.
⚡️I actually think this is one of the defining patterns of the next decade.
Not because smart people suddenly became less intelligent.
Because the market changed what it rewards.
For most of the twentieth century, intelligence and economic success were highly correlated because institutions had a scarcity of cognitive labor.
The smartest engineer.
The smartest lawyer.
The smartest analyst.
The smartest doctor.
The system paid for intelligence because intelligence was scarce.
AI is beginning to industrialize intelligence itself.
That breaks the old bargain.
The smartest person in the room no longer automatically creates the most economic value.
The person who organizes capital.
Owns distribution.
Builds a company.
Creates trust.
Coordinates people.
Owns assets.
Uses AI better than everyone else.
Often wins.
The market has always rewarded value creation, not IQ.
The twentieth century happened to make those two look almost identical.
That may have been the anomaly.
The deeper tragedy is psychological.
Many brilliant people built their identity around being intellectually exceptional.
Then the world shifted.
Their comparative advantage disappeared while their identity remained attached to it.
That creates paralysis.
Meanwhile the “mid” person keeps moving.
Not because they’re smarter.
Because they optimize for the game that actually exists instead of the one that rewarded them in school.
School rewards correctness.
Markets reward adaptation.
Those are different skills.
The smartest people often become prisoners of their own models.
Average people often become surprisingly successful because they update faster.
The deepest pattern is this:
Intelligence without agency is becoming one of the least rewarded combinations in modern civilization.
That is why the post feels true.
Not every genius is failing.
Not every average person is succeeding.
The distribution itself is changing.
The future belongs less to the people who know the most.
It belongs to the people who convert knowledge into ownership, action, trust, and leverage.
The twentieth century rewarded being the best worker.
The twenty-first increasingly rewards becoming the owner of the system the workers operate inside.
That is the phase transition.
And I think most people still believe they’re living in the old one.
The most controversial idea you'll hear today:
Female promiscuity and the commodification of sexual intimacy are the female equivalents of violent criminal behaviour in men.
Both exploit a biological advantage to extract resources from the vulnerable.
Men through strength.
Women through beauty.
They manifest differently, but they arise from the same evolutionary logic: the corruption of natural strengths into predatory strategies.
This is nuts.
Mark Cuban just said something every young person should hear.
AI agents are going to run through every small and mid-size business in the country.
Not a single one of those owners will know how to build them.
His advice: learn Claude. Learn agentic workflows. Just learn AI and how it works.
Then go to these businesses and help them — because they won't know how to do any of this.
They have money to spend. They have deep problems.
They don't have you.
But first you need to know how to build agents.
This is the complete course ↓
Bookmark this. This is the opportunity.
El ingeniero que construyo Claude Code acaba de soltar un video de 28 minutos donde te enseña a escribir prompts que realmente funcionan
He visto cursos de 300 dolares que no llegan ni a la mitad de lo que explica en los primeros 10 minutos
Archivos CLAUDE.md, atajos de memoria, sesiones paralelas y patrones de prompting que cambian el juego
Todo en un solo video y completamente gratis
Da igual si eres principiante, desarrollador o ya llevas meses usandolo
Esto te va a hacer usar Claude como nunca antes
Michael Jordan's trainer (Tim Grover) has revealed the truth 🔥
''In the debate please, here we go. Three parts.
One: player has won the scoring title, regular season MVP, was first team defensive, led the playoffs in scoring, and won the MVP in the finals. All five things. It’s only happened four times in the NBA. You know who the four players to do it were? Jordan, Jordan, Jordan, Jordan.
Number two: if you own a pair of Jordans or have a pair of Jordans, stand up. Wow. If you have a pair of LeBrons, stand up.
Number three, here comes a Mike Rob right here. We’ve all heard the stories about individuals getting robbed for their Jordans. And have we heard a story anybody getting stuck up for a pair of LeBron? There you go.''
— Source: Clutch Time
All of us NBA fans 100% agree with Tim Grover's opinion.
Warren Buffett spent $1.7 billion on trailer homes
The man can buy anything on the planet. He looked at every investment on earth and put $1.7 billion into the housing everyone makes fun of. That was 2003. He's been quietly printing off it for 20+ years
Everyone laughs at trailer parks. The smartest investor alive collects them. One of those two groups is wrong:
Here's the machine nobody examines because they're too busy smirking
In a mobile home park, the investor owns the LAND. The residents own their homes. Sit with that, because it breaks every rule you think you know about landlords
The resident owns the roof. The resident owns the furnace. The resident owns the water heater that dies at 2am. The park owner owns dirt and collects rent on the dirt, $300-$600 a month per lot, and his whole maintenance list is roads, grass, and water lines
No toilets. No carpets. No renovations. Rent on dirt
And the part that makes the returns silly: moving a mobile home costs $5,000-$10,000. The people living in a park almost never have that sitting around. So they don't leave. Park residents stay for decades, and when one does leave, they usually sell the home to the next resident and the lot rent never skips a month
A 50-lot park at $450 a lot collects $270,000 a year for owning a field with pipes in it
Now hold the two Americas side by side. Everyone with a podcast is bidding against 30 other people for downtown condos and Airbnbs with hot tubs, assets that photograph well. The least photogenic housing in the country runs the fattest margins in the business, with waiting lists, because cities almost never approve new parks. The supply is frozen forever. What exists is the entire market
Rich people buy what's ugly and pays. Broke people buy what looks good on Instagram. Buffett has been saying this his whole life and the trailer park is him saying it with $1.7 billion
You don't need a park to use the lesson. The lesson is that the market pays a permanent premium for pretty and hands out a permanent discount for embarrassing, and the discount side is where the money is. Every ugly house I've ever bought was this exact trade at a smaller size
The asset everyone jokes about is the asset nobody competes with you for
If you want to flip a house but have $0 in the bank, you can get funded for up to $150k with a hard money loan or 0% APR credit cards. Keep an eye out
We hear all the time that women bring problems because they are neurotic...
That's NOT the full story.
Many women in marriages today have incredible foresight.
Many men confuse a woman's foresight with her being "neurotic."
Female neuroticism can help men with accountability.
How does this work?
Because women try to avoid potential problems before they exist.
They are the more fragile sex, so naturally they are risk-averse.
Men, however, address the problem once it's presented.
But just because a man fixes an issue doesn't mean he brought a solution to resolve the problem.
If you stick duct tape on something broken, that doesn't mean it's not still broken.
How can you tell if she's being proactive vs. just creating problems that don't exist?
Here's how:
She sees where today's habits lead tomorrow.
She knows she can't force her husband to change, so the goal isn't nagging.
She speaks through her own actions in a meek and mild spirit and hopes her husband notices.
That can be hard in a marriage.
Especially when it takes two people to accomplish a goal.
That's why many women feel like they're in a one-sided relationship and eventually detach within the marriage.
Because when your spouse doesn't actually get on board with a solution and dismisses what requires work and short-term discomfort...
Such as:
Eating better to avoid metabolic disease.
Working harder so you don't lose financial stability.
Applying discipline so you can level up in life...
Then guess who ends up carrying the weight when it all falls apart?
Your spouse.
The spouse who was proactive ends up taking on 150% of the burden for the other spouse who refused to change.
It's the spouse who sees patterns.
Connects the dots.
Recognizes that every small decision becomes tomorrow's consequences.
Who ends up paying for the spouse who lacked foresight.
The problem is that when women talk about this issue, they're often called neurotic, dramatic, or told they're creating problems that don't exist.
Worse yet, they are told they "choose wrong."
Then years later, those same problems become reality.
And now she has to suffer the consequences of her husband's lack of self-control.
Whether it's your health, your finances, your career, or your marriage...
Prevention always looks unnecessary...
Until the consequences show up.
"If it isn't broken, why fix it?" Right??
Wrong. 😑
That's exactly how we got here.
People ignored the warning signs.
Avoided the hard work.
Assumed there would be no consequences.
Now everyone pays the price.
Sometimes the person asking you to change isn't trying to "control you."
They're trying to protect everyone your choices will affect tomorrow.
Know the difference.
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.1M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
112.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.2M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.3M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.6M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
74.1M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.3M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
64.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers