Everything's going to be fine

Mandatory vaccination as a preventive medical intervention disagrees with article 6 section 1 of the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.

[AlphaFox @alphafox]

I was not expecting this: 😮

[Everything's going to be fine @Everythingsgoi2]

@Simi_2210_ Not perhaps the answer you wanted but the sort of answer you get in a tricky IQ test. The left column is 1,2,4,8 etc the right column the sum of the numbers above and if it's double digits the 1 is added to the left column. Double and minus 3 is much nicer though.

[Everything's going to be fine @Everythingsgoi2]

@Simi_2210_ 170

[Everything's going to be fine @Everythingsgoi2]

@CraigBrockie Guide

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

This was spot on the money last month. Please share

[🇮🇪 Andy Quirke @MrAndyQuirke]

💉Millions of excess deaths being covered up. Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated. Dr. John Campbell & Dr Robert Clancy.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

They're Not Fortifying Flour — They're Fortifying Control: The Hidden CANCER Risk Behind the Folic Acid Mandate.

Melissa Ciummei exposes the UK's Dec 2026 mandate for synthetic folic acid in all flour-based foods. This isn't nutrition—it's mass medication.

Harms include:

• Accelerates cancer growth by fueling rapid cell division and tumor proliferation.
• Undermines cancer treatments; NHS warns cancer patients to avoid it unless prescribed.
• Masks B12 deficiency, causing undetected long-term damage.
• Poses serious risks for those with heart stents, kidney disease, or folic acid allergies.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Wokeism & victimhood ideology in one brutal experiment:

Women had fake facial scars applied for job interviews.
They saw the scars in the mirror.

Researchers secretly removed them before the interview.

Women believed they were disfigured… and reported MASSIVE discrimination — interviewers "referencing" scars that didn't exist.

57-sec clip — Konstantin Kisin exposes how victim mindset creates its own reality 👇

If you're constantly told you're oppressed, you'll start seeing it everywhere.

Your take: Self-fulfilling prophecy or something deeper?

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

“The World Health Organisation has decided the world has too many people”

“What that means is a Holocaust”

Doctor Rima Laibow appeared on a TV show in 2009 called conspiracy theory - the show was then pulled from everywhere and she was forced to flee America for revealing the truth. Turns out she was right.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

"Scientists are now confirming what many have long suspected."

"The Covid shots don't just impact your immune system—they can damage your brain and devastate mental health."

"The evidence is overwhelming."

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Do you want the unpalatable truth or sweet lies ? Here is the unpalatable truth

[Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP @CartlandDavid]

Criminals. BOMBSHELL: MODERNA CEO ADMITS MAKING 100K DOSES OF COVID VACCINE IN 2019... then says he knew the PLANDEMIC was coming.... moderna sequence discovered in "virus" as well...

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

“In less than 48 hours…my son began talking for the first time in years…”

Leucovorin sat on the shelf for years because it proved that Autism was not genetic and that it was the Childhood Vaccines that were causing severe Brain Damage.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

🚨Study involving 1.7 million children has found that Myocarditis & Pericarditis only appeared in children who had received COVID mRNA vaccines.

Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from these heart-related problems.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

UK REMOVES MEDICINAL MUSHROOMS FROM CIRCULATION:
"The UK has reached a new peak of insanity. Turkey tail and cordyceps mushroom products are now being removed from UK shelves and cannot be legally sold as food or supplements due to a new crackdown by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) re-classifying these mushrooms as "novel foods" because they lacked
"significant consumption" in the UK/EU before May 15, 1997.
This is an extremely bad faith argument because both mushrooms are revered across East Asia (including China, Japan, Korea, and the Himalayas) as potent adaptogens and tonics with zero recorded safety concerns in traditional medicine for hundreds to thousands of years.
Turkey tail grows abundantly in UK forests. So someone please explain how the turkey tail that literally grows wild in the UK is any different than what's been used for thousands of years in a nearby culture? There are zero cases of side effects or toxicity.
Also consider that functional mushrooms are the chosen target here, not the Phthalates, bisphenols (BPA), pesticides, heavy metals, PFAS ("forever chemicals") and literally over 10,000 chemicals routinely added to foods in the UK.
They will tell you it's not a "ban" but actually just a newly required costly pre-market authorisation (typically affordable only by large companies) but the truth is no artisan company actually making a real quality mushroom product that uses turkey tail or cordyceps will be able to jump through the hoops of these "authorisations".
As of now in the UK mushrooms cannot be legally sold as food or supplements. This has forced UK businesses like Bristol Fungarium, Mushies UK, Mogo Farm, and Marvellous Mushrooms to remove products from shelves, despite the mushrooms' centuries-old use in traditional medicine (e.g., turkey tail as a cancer adjunct in Japan) and no evidence of safety risks.
This is a trial run, to see how the population reacts. If there's not enough pushback, you know they're coming for where you live next. This is the on-going battle that will continue to be waged against natural foods and herbal medicines.
Share this and let's get the word out that this is unacceptable."

Art With Aim

[Sophia Dahl @sophiadahl1]

Doctor's quotes from the 1800's that reveals the real story about vax, erased from History ‼️🙏👇

Full Video 👇👇

https://t.co/MyK6gruqRP

[Louise McKenna @_louise__]

When Ireland joined the EEC in 1973, it inserted Article 29.4.3°–10° into Bunreacht na hÉireann.

ECJ SUPREMACY - The Trap Nobody Talks About

Here’s a fact most people in Ériú don’t realise:

Even if we held a referendum tomorrow and voted to REPEAL an EU rule… the EU Court of Justice would STILL claim supremacy over us in that area.

Why?
Because the ECJ invented a doctrine that says:

EU law outranks every national law, even a Constitution, in any area the Treaties cover.

Ireland never explicitly agreed to this.
No referendum ever said “The EU may override the Irish Constitution.”

The ECJ just declared supremacy in cases like:

Costa v ENEL (1964)

Handelsgesellschaft (1970)

Simmenthal (1978)

And once a Member State signs a Treaty, the ECJ says it is permanent and absolute in those areas.

So even if the Irish people said NO to:

EU migration policies

EU climate rules

EU digital ID

EU data sharing (EHDS)

EU emergency health powers (HERA)

…the ECJ would still claim the final say because the Treaties were already signed.

This directly contradicts Article 1 of the Irish Constitution, which says:

Sovereignty is inalienable.

And “inalienable” means:

You cannot give it away.

Not by referendum.

Not by treaty.

Not even temporarily.

So here is the truth:

The Constitution says sovereignty stays with the Irish people.
The ECJ says sovereignty stays with the EU wherever the Treaties apply.

Both cannot be true.

And unless people understand this, we can’t have a real conversation about:

EU membership

the digital transition

migration

climate regulation

or anything else coming down the line.

If Ireland ever wanted to reclaim full control over ANY EU policy area, it wouldn’t be enough to amend the Constitution.

We would have to repeal Article 29.4 (the EU Treaty clause) or renegotiate/exit the relevant Treaties.

That’s the legal reality almost nobody is being told.

Sovereignty is ours, but only if we know it and assert it.

🇮🇪💚