I find undervalued stocks before the crowd.
No hype. Just data, cycles and probability.
Sharing setups in real time.
Building a data-driven investing system.
PSC Portfolio — End of Month Update
Day 61 of running the live PSC portfolio.
Started: $100,000
Current value: $130,802.56
Total return: +30.80%
This month’s closed positions show the edge:
$DELL +183.95%
$FSLR +62.14%
$CPAY +27.18%
$KEY +10.72%
Worst closed loss?
$BG -3.73%
Winners win big, Losers lose little.
That’s how real portfolio asymmetry is built.
PSC Portfolio — End of Month Update
Day 61 of running the live PSC portfolio.
Started: $100,000
Current value: $130,802.56
Total return: +30.80%
This month’s closed positions show the edge:
$DELL +183.95%
$FSLR +62.14%
$CPAY +27.18%
$KEY +10.72%
Worst closed loss?
$BG -3.73%
Winners win big, Losers lose little.
That’s how real portfolio asymmetry is built.
That’s my concern though. And this is coming from someone who’s been holding BTC since 2017.
Last cycle: roughly ~20x from lows → ~75% drawdown.
This cycle: roughly ~6-7x from lows.
I’m not saying a 70% drawdown wouldn’t create a good entry. I’m questioning whether BTC remains as attractive if upside multiples keep shrinking while downside stays similarly brutal.
If we eventually accept ~70% drawdowns but only get +300% from the bottom next cycle, the risk/reward profile gets materially worse.
Why should downside stay almost the same while upside compresses?
🚨 NOW IS THE TIME TO BUY $NOW! 🚨
Just scooped another 10 shares @ $122.35
Asked ChatGPT, Grok & Claude what to buy… they ALL picked $NOW 🔥
Who’s loading up? Drop a 🔥 if you’re bullish!
@LouDo91041636@sunnydecree So you are expecting the same drawdowns as previous cycles? Whats the point of investing in an asset that has diminishing returns but the same huge drawdowns?
If sunny is buying now its because he understands we also have diminishing drawdowns