Here is the audio clip of @thetomcelica platforming himself on someone else's Space to make false “doxxing” accusations about Buick and other victims, despite having previously been told in writing that he was being misled. (Audio is at 1.5x speed for brevity.) 🏴☠️ #DarkArmada
⚠️ This is a response to sustained abuse.
Maura Rolls (who worked at a lawyer’s office and is from Florida) has the smarts of a 5th grader and clearly zero self-awareness.
✨ She accused Buick of crimes that never happened. ✨
But that's “illegal”? Hmm...concerning. 🤔
Congratulate her, she’s been caught in 4K working with blackmailers, suicide baiters, and dangerous trolls.
Your abhorrent actions sicken me.
Pretending to be the victim of “doxxing” from a group that has quite literally worked to PROTECT their victims was not on her bingo card.
Get a grip, you EVIL old, abusive hag.
⚠️ This is a response to sustained abuse.
Maura Rolls (who worked at a lawyer’s office and is from Florida) has the smarts of a 5th grader.
She literally lied and defamed Buick’s character.
Buick didn’t care much about any of this “drama” until Cameron (the blueberry farmer in PEI/Nova Scotia, Canada) threatened her family’s safety.
Buick ≠ Legion. Buick ≠ anyone else but Buick.
In all her reckless stupidity, she has been intimidating a protected victim that includes children over the actions of other people.
Congratulate her, she’s been caught in 4K.
Working with blackmailers, suicide baiters, and dangerous trolls is abhorrent.
Pretending to be the victim of “doxxing” from a group that has quite literally worked to PROTECT their victims was not on her bingo card.
Get a grip, you EVIL old, child-abusing hag.
Maura (UUID: 1167775229109837825) continues to show a reckless disregard for the truth while cyberstalking her target.
I think she thinks I’m scared of her blackmail.
Unfortunately, she and Cameron believe the account in her screenshot is Buick, and she’ll be sorely disappointed when she spends a fuckton of money chasing a ghost.
✨ It’s legitimately pathetic that you think you would actually scare Nazis. ✨
You’ve all put yourselves in an extremely vulnerable position chasing Buick and the Armada when we were the ones trying to teach you valuable lessons.
It’s a shame you have to learn the hard way.
Maura (UUID: 1167775229109837825) continues to show a reckless disregard for the truth while cyberstalking her target with what we firmly believe is malicious intent.
She repeatedly claims I have “zero proof” of my accusations that she targeted me first. Those accusations are not unfounded — the evidence is public and accessible to anyone.
Timestamps show only limited prior interactions until she, her friend Cameron, and others began targeting Buick.
That campaign relied on lies, cherry-picked evidence framed out of context, and threats of litigation simply for exercising free speech in response to a random and pointless attack.
We have every right to defend ourselves and refuse to be held responsible for other people’s actions.
There were never any DMs with this woman, and I was never in their group chats (evidence of this is also publicly available).
She continues to claim that sharing her own public posts after she targeted Buick constitutes “doxxing.” It does not. Those posts are shared to document the ongoing targeting of Buick, who left in June and still will not leave me alone.
I am unsure what she is trying to achieve. Her behavior suggests she may be experiencing a mental health crisis or some form of delusion, and she should seek appropriate medical care rather than continuing to focus on Buick.
She and her network continue to target a non-verbal autistic protected victim and children in ways that threaten their safety, with no apparent regard for the danger this creates.
She has put the #DarkArmada on notice that she intends to continue this behavior (behind a block).
We recommend reporting and blocking them. 🏴☠️
(The Grok she posted actually makes me sound pretty awesome:
https://t.co/MX1WYNDY5N)
If you love not doing due diligence and are so stupid that you fall for shit like this as a divisive tool for triangulation, than look no further... 🏴☠️
Cops are now using financial data and traffic patterns captured by Flock cameras to pull people over for being "suspicious."
Full story: https://t.co/EkegqV9i22
This is the beginning of "pre-crime" or "predictive" policing, where police pull over people they think have committed a crime without having any evidence that they have done so.
This police stop in this video was based in part on “information contained within law enforcement-sensitive systems suggesting financial activity patterns commonly associated with illicit narcotics activity.”
NEW: The biggest welfare scam in the country is run by a consulting giant.
Deloitte has made over $6 billion running error-prone eligibility systems that make it harder for Americans to get the healthcare and food aid they rely on.
We investigated the big business of welfare.
Markle and Tom need to get kicked to the curb by #smokefleet.
I gave Markle some rope and he already hung himself.
I got enough on bargain-bin Liam to make him walk the proverbial plank.
Ari (who is a man 😱), now on AriHondaBarbie (1749011973818531841), is the same man who begged to become admin for tit shots and craves tw|nk ass occasionally (according to them).
He now clutches pearls really tight. 😭
They pretend to be our victim while being too stupid to ride the big kids’ bus and have been intimidating a non-verbal autistic protected victim with false accusations.
They’re okay with threatening their safety.
They played in traffic too many times and can’t comprehend that Buick ≠ other people.
Congrats to who sexted with this fairy beast. 🏴☠️
Ari (1771467392348270592) — the same woman who pretends to be our victim while cyberstalking, publicly sharing private/non-public information alongside false accusations, and targeting protected victims and children in ways that threaten their safety — has put the #DarkArmada on notice that she intends to continue.
We suggest reporting and blocking them. 🏴☠️
Provoking someone into defending themselves, just to weaponize their reaction against them, isn’t manipulation by accident. It’s cruelty wearing a strategy mask.
Cameron who is in PEI/Nova Scotia has placed the lives of a protected non-verbal autistic in danger.
These things are amusing to him.
Allow him to tell you about how much he's supporting Maura the paralegal in Florida.
They both can't spell 5th grade words.
Maura falsely accused Buick of federal-level crimes based on screenshots of other people. 🏴☠️
Cameron who is in PEI/Nova Scotia has placed the lives of a protected non-verbal autistic in danger.
These things are amusing to him.
Allow him to tell you about himself, his family, how financially well-off they are. 🏴☠️
Cameron who is in PEI/Nova Scotia has placed the lives of a protected non-verbal autistic in danger.
These things are amusing to him.
Allow him to tell you about himself, his family, how financially well-off they are. 🏴☠️
Cameron chose to cater to suicide baiters and be a proxy for them. Crazy, right?!
Now he and his OPSEC skills can be exposed.
He's likewise so mindbogglingly stupid that he intentionally chose to threaten the safety of a protected victim who is non-verbal autistic.
Now he's best buds with blackmailers. 💅🏽
Since he also played in traffic too many times, he's now involved in a blackmail ring and will be reported as such.
A simple retraction is all that Buick asked for.
Cameron chose to cater to suicide baiters and be a proxy for them. Crazy, right?!
Now he and his OPSEC skills can be exposed.
He's likewise so mindbogglingly stupid that he intentionally chose to threaten the safety of a protected victim who is non-verbal autistic.
Now he's best buds with blackmailers. 💅🏽
Since he also played in traffic too many times, he's now involved in a blackmail ring and will be reported as such.
A simple retraction is all that Buick asked for.
Hi Cameron, welcome to #Anonymous.
One tip I have for a new initiate is for you to make sure you are correct before making false public accusations, threatening the safety of a protected victim, and intimidating her.
Abusers often use proxies to abuse their victims.
As such, you should know that Buick isn’t any of the other accounts that you and your friends have dogpiled her over, incited significant harm toward, and falsely accused of “doxxing” to get others to attack her as well.
This is important to give to the lawyer you hire. 🏴☠️
“What she has done is unacceptable and unforgivable. During those months, she has disgraced our family name and reputation. Photographs of her naked body are circulating throughout the region. We have become targets of ridicule, mockery and contempt.” 🏴☠️
🚨 BREAKING:
New details have emerged from Andrew Tate's trafficking minors charge.
The following email was allegedly sent by the alleged victim's father to Tate, indicating that the father had discovered pornographic content of the daughter when she was a minor, and was concerned that she was not going to school:
Andrew,
This is XXXXXX’s father. I am writing to you to clarify what has happened. Recently, I have felt the need to “speak” with you, man to man.
My English is not good enough to speak with you properly over the phone, so I am contacting you first by email. As far as I know, you are aware of what XXXXXX has been doing and where she has been during the last three months of her stay in London.
What she has done is unacceptable and unforgivable. During those months, she has disgraced our family name and reputation. Photographs of her naked body are circulating throughout the region. We have become targets of ridicule, mockery and contempt.
It is not only obscene photographs that have circulated, but also videos of her taking part in live erotic chat. I would like your explanation, so that I can confirm that we are both hearing the same story.
She went to London to study. She took leave from a prestigious church high school here, intending-or under the pretext-that she would return to graduate. After that, she could have gone wherever she wanted, including to be with you.
I must admit that I was never in favour of this, but the contract with a modelling agency gave me hope that she would be able to pursue her dream of modelling. I should have asked many more questions.
It is extremely unconventional to take a 17-year-old girl away without first introducing yourself to her parents. I blame myself for an enormous oversight—in hindsight, I should never have agreed to this arrangement.
She claims she did it for money. Please understand: we are not a poor family.
Nor were our daughters raised in luxury. We have everything we need. Our children have never gone without anything. It is true that not every whim of theirs was satisfied, but I do not consider that a disadvantage.
What I am saying is that there was never any need for us to send our own children abroad into the care of strangers. She could have gone there if she wanted to study.
My wife, who visited the two of you in London a month ago, returned describing you as a responsible and honest man who loves our daughter and understands that, at only 17 years old, she needs to be looked after. I found that reassuring, even though you and I had never met. Your alleged statement to my daughter, “I am your father now,” reinforced my wife’s impression that you were a responsible and straightforward man.
So I will ask you directly, and I expect direct answers.
What assurances and evidence can you give me that my daughter is continuing her high-school education in England and is not—forgive me for being blunt—simply a paid mistress?
Please explain to me how you were looking after her if something like this was allowed to happen. Did you not check where she was going—especially if your brother Tristan was driving her there? Were you not interested in the photographs she was having taken? When she sent me some of the photographs, I immediately commented on the poor lighting, which no reputable photographer would have published.
Having seen some of the comments online, how do you explain her working night shifts? Did nobody notice that she was gone during those hours?
How can I trust an adult who promises to take care of my daughter when, within three weeks, I am confronted with this disgusting affair by members of my congregation in my hometown, completely blindsided?
What guarantee can you give me that this behaviour will not happen again-or, God forbid, that she will not end up posing for photographs and videos containing even more explicit material, creating an even bigger scandal for all of us?
Frankly, there is not much further she could go.
What prospects does she have if she does not attend school and obtain her high-school diploma? What will she do-become a shop assistant, perhaps a doorman? From what I have observed, she is not particularly interested in her education.
What kind of modelling career does she have when the first photographs of her that I found enthusiastically reviewed online are erotic in nature and her reputation has already been damaged?
I want to ask you quite openly: how serious are you about my daughter, and what are your intentions toward her?
Do you realise that her actions cast a shadow over all of us, including you? I am not completely familiar with the British legal system, but distributing images and videos of a sexual nature involving a minor is a criminal offence here in Slovakia.
I am fairly certain that the same is true in the United Kingdom. She is not an adult in either of our countries. Under Slovak law, we, her parents, remain responsible for her.
You may be held legally responsible for her actions once this reaches the authorities. What does your family think about all of this? Will they not see her as just another girl of questionable morals from the East who came there to make money indecently?
We did not raise her this way, and I dare say this would never have happened had she remained at home.
Andrew, I do not want you to think that I blame you entirely, and correct me if I am wrong, but you bear some responsibility for this because you agreed to take responsibility for her welfare during her stay in England and, as such, for what happened.
I therefore expect you to be a man and answer all of my questions in this email.
I will not lie: I am deeply disappointed by my daughter’s behaviour, carelessness and ignorance, as well as by how her stay in the United Kingdom has developed. As her father, I am filled with disappointment, anger and humiliation. At this point I can only guess at the serious consequences this disgusting affair will have for my position as a Lutheran pastor and what it will mean for my family.
I am sure you agree that this needs to be resolved quickly. I will not accept a resolution consisting merely of declarations of your love for one another and promises that everything will be fine. As far as I am concerned, ending her stay in the United Kingdom and returning her home is the only solution.
On Friday, I told my daughter to return home within one week. Please do not challenge this decision. If she does not comply and my underage daughter has not returned by Friday, 9 January, I have decided that I will travel to London and bring her home myself.
I understand that not protecting her, but instead sending her back, may be a sacrifice for you. If you truly love her-if you love one another-you will get through it. For now, it may even be a relief.
Mistakes have consequences that must be endured. This is a universal law that she needs to learn and experience. Because of the disappointment she has caused us, we have lost our trust in her.
I never imagined I would live to see such poor judgement and immoral behaviour from her. Having demonstrated that she is immature, deceptive and in need of guidance, XXXXXX cannot remain abroad because she needs to be under parental supervision before the situation gets even further out of control.
We, her parents, have withdrawn our consent for her to remain abroad, and she will return home. It would be difficult for her to return to the school she attended in Košice and openly face the shame, so a new school will have to be found.
In addition, our daughter’s written admission to my wife concerning her alleged sex addiction means that we must seek professional help for her immediately.
Did you know about this? What do you think about this admission? If you were aware of it, how did you intend to deal with it?
Trivialising the seriousness of this situation will not help anyone. On the contrary, sheltering her will only cause further harm. It will allow her to remain under the illusion that she does not understand the extent of the damage done to you and to our family, as well as the possible damage to herself and her future career-whatever that may be.
I do not accept her excuse that you know everything, have forgiven her, and that everything will be fine because you will not send her away and she has nowhere else to go. This is an enormous understatement, perhaps caused by her young age and her inability to comprehend the seriousness of this failure.
With so little life experience, she is incapable of fully understanding the consequences of this terrible lapse in judgement. This will never simply be “fine.”
I look forward to your reply and to seeing you take an honourable position on this matter.
Sincerely,
XXXXXX’s father