ExpectedValue

Making Predictions.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@ericvideos91 Partisans hate collaboration. Canada is facing an existential threat and you want politics to become more divided than it already is? It's really disappointing to see how loyal Partisans on both sides have become at the expense of their Nations future well being.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@JudahsLife @ericvideos91 You literally don't understand the basics of causality. You still haven' provided a single piece of evidence, and are making definitive claims without it. Im done here, you're not open minded and don't have the reasoning skills for this.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@JudahsLife @ericvideos91 Not at all, im stating that you have to determine a very strong causal relationship when declaring many issues as entirely one person's or parties fault.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@SixFourDwarf @ericvideos91 Voting for a party doesnt mean you instantly support everything that party does. The reality of voting is there are two options, both with imperfect policy goals. I wouldn't blame a conservative voter for everything they have done. Both sides have made plenty stupid decisions.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@SixFourDwarf @ericvideos91 I've actively opposed the continuation of such under his leadership. It is easily on the his biggest and active failures, that said, party leaders im Canada don't have dictator like powers, and so it's fair to accept some downsides with any leadership.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale Look them up on google, you're just embarrassing yourself atp. Not every datasets was even from statcan. Also, declared gender is completely different and tracked differently than biological gender. You're just lazy and grasping at straws.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale All of those I listed will give you the best picture available, and supprts my claim more than yours. Enjoy.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale Bank of Canada CSCE:

Canadians saying whether they're increasing Canadian purchases / reducing U.S. purchases

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale StatCan 36-10-0478-01:

Detailed Supply and Use Tables: domestic production + imports → consumption/investment/exports
Annual, lagged

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale StatCan 16-10-0047-01:

Canadian manufacturing shipments/sales by industry

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale StatCan 20-10-0080-01:

Canadian retail sales by detailed NAPCS commodity

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale StatCan CIMT detailed data:

Imports by HS10 × origin country × month

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale StatCan 12-10-0178-01:

Imports into Canada by country of origin × NAPCS product

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale Sure, let me spoon feed you.

NielsenIQ Homescan Consumer Panel + GS1 origin data:

Actual household purchases, product-by-product, classified Canada / U.S. / other
Monthly / transaction level

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@JudahsLife @ericvideos91 I'd agree that itd be good for Canada to follow these more positive examples, but to act as if the effect of those decisions would be the same is shaky ground at best.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@JudahsLife @ericvideos91 There are countries which have taken better actions, in some areas, no doubt there, but they are also different countries and have materially different realities and constraints. They have also made other poor decisions, which you probably just care about less.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@StickyWhispers @ztisdale Big difference between building planes, which everyone knows jow to build, and sponsoring development for planes specifically better at attacking WTC. The same cannot be said for COVID. The US sponsored development of COVID as gain of function project, to make it more dangerous.

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@THerr46656 @BarbellFi I said 'IF' for a reason. What you listed was challenging, sure, but when you look accross the board at objective measures by cohort, using well agreed upon statistics, the picture is quite clear. Today's 18 -30 year old has it much worse than the same grouping as 20-50 years ago

[ExpectedValue @ExpectedVal1111]

@AlwaysAlberta @Sean_C2 @ericvideos91 Also, nice reply to the other comments original question. I see you've really thought through your argument.