People demanding "proof" of election fraud are not understanding how crime works. I worked at Manhattan DA for over 2 years, one in Homicide. We never had video proof of the crime. We almost never had DNA. These are things that occur on CSI on TV, not in real life. And we still convicted people all the time.
What we had was testimony and circumstantial evidence. Travel times, bank records, cell phone data, gate access codes. Motive, capability, benefit, time and place. Never direct proof. Of course the defendant always denied the crime, but there was enough evidence to show that one had to have occurred nonetheless.
If what we have in the LA Mayoral election is a statistical anomaly that is beyond reasonable explanation with anything besides fraud, that is enough to prove a crime. This has been true since the beginning of Western Civlization.
Spencer Pratt is basically an abundance leftist but the abundance left celebrates the fact that Spencer is un-electable in any blue area and that is a nice synecdoche of why the "Abundance Left" is little more than a silly psy-op
Gay culture before: Michelangelo, Oscar Wilde, Jean Cocteau, Francis Bacon, Truman Capote, Elton John
Gay culture now: “flush out your asshole and load up on antiretrovirals before the bathhouse orgy!”
Don’t worry guys.
It’s totally normal for the no-name candidate deep in 3rd place to give a tear-filled concession speech on election night and then miraculously receive almost every Democrat vote in the 2 weeks after the election to defeat the most charismatic Republican candidate in decades.
Just another “safe and secure” election in LA.
I mean, there really do need to be enormous public trials where everyone involved in this shameful evil, from the perpetrators to the politicians, civil servants and police who allowed it to continue, are made to answer for their crimes. The punishments should be exemplary.
L’hyper féminisation de la magistrature française est l'une des plus profondes transformations sociologiques de l'État depuis les années 1970.
1946 : les femmes accèdent à la magistrature
1950 : 5 %
1970 : 20 %
1980 : 35 %
1990 : 50 %
2000 : 60 %
2010 : 65 %
2020 : 69 %
2026 : 72 %
C’est catastrophique. Décisions incompréhensibles. Affronts au bon sens judiciaire. Lois non appliquées. Laxisme outrancier. Revanche personnelle dans les cas de divorce. Multirécidives interminables. Contextualisations permanentes. Victimisation et infantilisation systémique des criminels. Crachat narquois au visage des vraies victimes. Trahisons. Émotionnel et idéologie partout. Raison nulle part.
La cause numéro 1 du chaos sociétal français.
#Lyhanna #Philippine #JLD #juges #OQTF #insecurité
I will never forget 2020 because I was watching every ballot drop in Wisconsin that night. With over 93% of the vote in, Trump was still up by six figures. I did a calculation and realized that Joe Biden would have to win the remainder by near unanimous numbers. Then the **impossible** happened.
Incredible how quickly the left went from environmental NIMBYism to "cut down every tree on the planet and pave over every field so we can battery farm Bomalians."
I try not to get political. But LA is where I live, and I am here to tell you: There is 0.0 percent chance these results are legit.
Nithya Raman has no base. No one knew who she was until Spencer Pratt torched her on debate stage. She gave a concession speech on Tuesday.
I really hope the federal government and @USAttyEssayli are investigating
(Again, apologize for getting political. Feel free to unfollow if this bothers you.
But a light needs to be shined on what's happening)
Nithya Raman conceded the race by the way….
She didn’t even believe she stood a chance. She knew she lost.
Now she’s surging past Spencer Pratt 5 days after the election in late night ballot drops.
Third world.
Nithya Raman conceded the race by the way….
She didn’t even believe she stood a chance. She knew she lost.
Now she’s surging past Spencer Pratt 5 days after the election in late night ballot drops.
Third world.
Duncan Manor in Towanda towers over the prairie, visible from I-55 and Route 66. It was built by a cattle breeder around 1865 and saved from decay about a decade ago. It’s now a family home you can tour and hold events at. A few interior shots below.
The reason ID is banned in California (and New York) elections is to enable large-scale fraud.
When you combine no ID and mail-in voting, fraud is de facto legalized.