Siobhan Whyte, whose daughter Rhiannon was brutally stabbed 23 times with a screwdriver by Sudanese asylum seeker Deng Chol Majek in October 2024, says she has been repeatedly ignored by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Labour ministers.
Rhiannon was attacked after her shift at a hotel housing asylum seekers — the same place where her killer was staying.
Desperate for real change, Siobhan is now turning to President Trump and Elon Musk. She is pushing for "Rhiannon’s Law" — including mandatory tagging, curfews, medical screenings, and proper vetting of asylum seekers in hotels and HMOs to prevent future tragedies. She accuses the UK government of two-tier policing and failing to tackle illegal small boat crossings.
A grieving mother should not have to seek international help to get basic accountability and border security.
In Rome, this savage named Shahadat Hossain from Bangladesh hacked an entire family to death with an axe inside their own home.
He slaughtered the father, the mother, and their 5-year-old daughter.
The teenage son got beaten within an inch of his life but somehow survived and is clinging to life in the hospital.
This animal had been stalking the mom after she rejected him.
Kept showing up at their house harassing her until he finally snapped and decided to wipe the whole family out.
Now he’s on the run and Italian cops are hunting him down.
In Bangladesh he already had 6 convictions for sexual violence and extortion.
Still, when he came to Italy, he became a member of the Bengali Islamic Nationalist party.
Europe keeps importing this kind of barbarism and then acts shocked when it explodes.
Secure the border. Deport the invaders.
Today, we were told that the 15-year-old boy who killed our beautiful 9-year-old niece, Aria, with a single stab wound to the chest is NOT GUILTY of murder or manslaughter.
How is this justice?
#JusticeForAria
🚨🚨🚨WHAT? …. Oh this is so bad from Labour and the globalist civil service.
They’ve proposed a “transformation review” in it the Civil Service could become an unelected, unaccountable, autonomous centre of power!
If these changes happen, it will mean unelected officials could ignore, frustrate or even override elected ministers through their own statutory powers or constitutional status.
It looks like Labour is trying to ensure only their agenda will ever be delivered in the UK, regardless of what party is voted into government.
Britain would have unelected quangos and bureaucrats holding power over our elected Government.
If changing the Government no longer changes government policy, then what’s the point in elections…. See? 🚨🚨🚨
When you read this you cannot believe that either our judicial system or the police service (in this case @metpoliceuk who by the way in the past have denied the existence of grooming gangs in London) ate fit for service.
You have a duty to be angered by this.
Two women are now dead because the police and courts did not do their job. Too busy chasing mean tweets to investigate actual murders and rapes…
This is Simon Levy.
He had been convicted of 13 sexual assaults since July 2018.
Yet he was still walking the streets of London in January 2025.
He then (allegedly) met a woman who said he jumped on her, broke her collarbone, strangled her and held her down while he raped her. She was left for dead. She managed to survive. The woman picked Levy out of a line-up.
A few months later, in April 2025, Levy was again connected to the murder of Carmenza Valencia-Trujillo. She had been found dead in the stairwell of an abandoned building in South London. Levy’s DNA was found at the scene and on her body. He was arrested at this point but released pending further investigation.
What were the police thinking?
Just a few months later, in August 2025, Levy met a third victim, Sheryl Wilkins in the same car park in which the first rape victim had been attacked. Sheryl’s body was found with 83 wounds on it and Levy’s DNA was all over her.
Sheryl would still be alive if the police had kept him in custody.
Sheryl and Carmenza would still be alive if he had actually received any meaningful sentence for the 13 sexual assaults committed in the previous 7 years!
Andy Burnham is now taking a few questions, albeit in highly controlled circumstances. He’s coming across as a bit Forrest Gump: well-meaning, naïve, uninformed.
So let’s get real. Here’s a proper question about a huge issue.
There are almost 11m people of working age in the UK who are economically inactive.
Yet Skills England reports that construction is short of 1m workers to meet the current infrastructure and housing targets — and that’s before you include Mr Burnham’s plans for a massive council house building programme.
It’s a clear sign of a labour market — skills shortage AND huge inactive labour pool — not functioning properly.
It needs to be put right before we have any chance of decent growth.
So, Mr Burnham, what would you do to put it right?
Oh, Torsten. The moral crusader. The ethics watchdog. The man who would police Farage's donations while his own party drowns in a swamp of undeclared gifts and millionaire patronage.
You attack Farage for "undeclared donations from a criminal." You do this with a straight face. You do this as a Labour MP. You do this while your own leader had to scramble to declare gifts from Lord Alli after initially "forgetting" the rules. Clothes. Accommodation. Gifts for his wife. The same Lord Alli who funded Starmer's campaign. The same Lord Alli who bought access and influence and now enjoys the view from the moral high ground you pretend to occupy.
The donations to Farage were made before he was even an MP, Torsten. Different rules applied. But facts never stopped a desperate smear, did they? You see the polling. You see Reform rising. You see your working-class base abandoning you for the man you cannot beat on ideas, so you try to beat him with bureaucratic technicalities. How noble. How brave. How utterly predictable.
Your party took four million pounds from Quadrature Capital. Your party took millions from Dale Vince while he harvested one hundred and forty-five million in taxpayer subsidies. Your party is funded by unions who expect their pound of flesh in policy concessions. But yes, please, lecture us about donations and personal gain.
You are not an ethics campaigner, Torsten. You are a hypocrite with a press release. A man who throws stones from a glass palace built by exactly the kind of donors you pretend to despise. The public see through you. They see the selective outrage. They see the desperation. They see a party that has lost the argument and now seeks to disqualify the winner.
Keep throwing those stones, Torsten. Your glass house is already cracking.
Someone should remind Ms. Bell Ribeiro-Addy that she is the MP for CLAPHAM not the CARIBBEAN
Why is a Labour MP advocating for foreign powers that seek to BANKRUPT Britain by demanding TRILLIONS in reparations?
These countries are led by incompetent & substandard leaders - many of them corrupt, too - who have run their economies into the ground.
Rather than admit that, they seek to blame their ills on colonialism.
The reparations grift has nothing to do with slavery.
In fact, according to a reputable poll taken in 2011, a whopping 60% of Jamaicans said they would be better off if Britain had never left. Only 17% said they would be worse off.
And the facts back them up.
Today, the parts of the Caribbean which remain overseas territories or departments of the UK, France (Guadeloupe, Martinique etc.), the Netherlands (Aruba etc.) and the United States (Puerto Rico etc.) have significantly higher incomes and better public services than the fully independent Caribbean states.
Like all former British colonies, the independent Caribbean states inherited all of the assets (infrastructure, civil service, legal system, parliament, military, police etc.) required to become a success story.
Former colonies like Singapore have been fortunate to be led by competent - indeed, brilliant - leaders.
The Caribbean story, however, has been one of corruption and incompetence. Rather than admit that, they sink into the corrosive politics of victimhood: blaming others for their sad predicament and seeking hand outs.
The British built more than 20 hospitals in Jamaica before it achieved independence in 1962.
How many hospitals has the Jamaican government built since 1962? Two.
Me on @GBNews:
Marine Vet Daniel Penny stepped up to protect innocent people on a NYC subway.
Alvin Bragg’s response? A vicious, politically motivated prosecution that nearly destroyed his life.
A jury saw through the BS and acquitted him.
Now Penny is fighting back — suing Bragg for malicious prosecution.
Enough is enough. These weaponized DAs have ruined good Americans with zero accountability for far too long.
It’s time they face consequences.
#JusticeForDanielPenny #HoldBraggAccountable
Today should have been Saffie-Rose Roussos 18th birthday but she was murdered in the Manchester Arena bombing in May 2017. Happy Birthday sweetheart. You are remembered. You are loved.
A Muslim man who tried to rape a 14 year old girl in Manchester named Mohammed Ayaz, originally from Pakistan, has been found dead just before he was due to be sentenced for his crime.
Must be The "Citizen Viligante" case
Prison justice strikes again. Sometimes justice wears an orange jumpsuit
Sentence completed-case closed.
Britain is doomed if Andy Burnham lurches sharply left
We risk a 1976-style crisis if the prime minister-in-waiting caves to the Labour party power brokers who are putting him in Number Ten.
UK government borrowing is out of control – we're adding more than £20bn per month to this country's national debt.
Since 2023, more than 80pc of the money the state has borrowed has been spent on debt interest – a bill that now exceeds 3.5pc of annual GDP.
This is akin to a Ponzi scheme.
Appointing trade-union fanboy Ed Miliband as Chancellor may well buy Burnham time, mollifying the massed ranks of economically-illiterate Labour MPs and party activists.
But Miliband in Number Eleven would cost Britain another £20bn-£30bn a year in debt interest – adding to an annual debt-service bill that has been consistently above £100bn since 2024 and is heading for £140bn by 2030.
And that’s if the hard-nosed, faceless institutional investors bankrolling profligate Britain don’t veto Miliband's appointment altogether – by sparking absolute chaos in the form of a payments crisis.
That would result in an IMF-style external bailout, with Britain run by unelected global technocrats, amid a crippling slump, pulverising austerity measures and a deep cost-of-living crisis – during which, of course, low-income households would suffer the most.
The economic, political and societal damage would be huge.
And it’s not just me warning of this – so are some of the world's most respected and distinguished economists, formerly holding senior leadership positions at @IMFNews, @bankofengland and @NIESRorg
My latest weekly @Telegraph "Economic Agenda" column (no paywall)
https://t.co/mKQ1xouw4r
An Islamist terrorist linked to the 7/7 London bombing
Haroon Aswat, with al-Qaeda ties has been released from a secure mental hospital and is now free to roam UK streets, despite explicit warnings from counter-terror police that he remains a major danger to national security.
52 innocent people died on 7/7. How on earth is this acceptable? Public safety should never take a back seat to bureaucratic mental health rulings. This is a failure that puts lives at risk.
The system is broken.
Multi-tier policing is obviously real, and the Left deals with that in their usual way: by making it low-status to notice it, so that people will be too embarrassed to say it.
In Milan, Italy a Gambian migrant walked up to a man he had never met and stabbed him 20 times.
The man was simply having a coffee with his friends. Miraculously, he survived.
When the police stopped the Gambian his answer was: “I had fun. As soon as I get out, I’ll do it again.”
This is the Europe that has been created by mass migration. This is the Europe that Ursula Von der Leyen wants you to live in. A Europe where you cannot even feel safe having a coffee at a bar.
We have imported pure evil into our lands. They will never change. They will never adapt. The only solution is to send them back home and never let another one enter.
Oh, Richard. The revolutionary. The socialist. The man who would ban gifts while his own hands remain elbow-deep in the public purse. You have laid an amendment, have you? To stop big money gifts? How very noble. How very consistent with your lifelong commitment to stopping people from keeping their own property.
You are a communist, Richard. You believe in distributing other people's wealth. You believe the state should seize, control, and redistribute. But suddenly, when a private citizen gives money to another private citizen, you discover principles. Suddenly you care about secrecy and propriety and the sanctity of private transactions. How curious. How convenient. How utterly, predictably hypocritical.
Your party shelters Louise Haigh. Convicted criminal. Still in government. Still voting on laws. Your party protects a Muslim MP who cannot be deported despite his crimes. Your party took four million from a hedge fund and millions more from green energy oligarchs. But yes, please, lecture us about the dangers of money in politics.
Your investigation is transparent, Richard. Politically motivated. Desperate. The dying gasp of a party that has lost the argument and now seeks to disqualify the winner. You could not beat Farage on ideas. You could not beat him on policy. So you try to beat him with bureaucracy. With amendments. With the petty, procedural weaponry of the establishment you pretend to oppose.
Keep laying those amendments, comrade. Keep pretending you care about corruption while your own benches stink of it. The public see you. They see the communist who hates private wealth unless it flows through his party's coffers. They see the revolutionary who has become exactly what he claimed to hate. A gatekeeper. A hypocrite. A joke.
The "best inequality economist in the world" has built his entire public profile on his insistence that wealth inequality is exploding when it's demonstrably not.
And he keeps getting away with it.
'...merely because dishonesty is present.'
So it's OK for a barrister to 'merely' be dishonest
What else would a barrister have to do to get disbarred
Murder someone ?