Dedicated to maximizing the developmental potential of all d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing children through theoretical & applied research. PI: Matt Hall, Temple U.
Language is like air: most of us don't appreciate how important it is until it's not there. Language helps us reason, learn, remember, solve problems, relate to others, regulate ourselves, and more! To reach their full potential, all DHH children need language: spoken or signed.
Attending this year's ASHA Convention? Keep an eye out for this presentation, by @ASLresearch, Stephanie De Anda, and @naomicaselli!
2225V - Translating Research to Practice in Sign Language Acquisition: New Concepts, New Tools, New Data https://t.co/whwFIuUltr #ASHA2021
@qi2cheng2 [Disclaimer: speaking as L2 signer!] I think it's an issue of how we gloss the translation and the semantic roles that we ascribe to the verb. I'd assign that verb's highest theta role as "experiencer", not agent. So, passive semantically but not syntactically. Maybe?
@craccess@languagefirst@mmfa Yes - yet another example of what NOT to do. For suggestions on how to approach this kind of work more appropriately, see https://t.co/baPubHSXsb
New open-access article: Hall (2020, Frontiers in Psychology) "The Input Matters: Assessing Cumulative Language Input in DHH Individuals and Populations"
Manuscript: https://t.co/nPV5k6ZGIn
ASL Summary (w/ English voiceover & captions): https://t.co/wZym4IbZiH
@megandfigueroa Deaf perspectives URGENTLY needed! The “word gap” for hearing gets all the attention but may not exist; very real for Deaf but overlooked.
Acadeafic recently turned one year old! 🎂 Want to know what our top 3 most viewed posts were the last year? Each of these posts had several thousand views. Drumroll... 🥁🥁
@kmccready The theory is clear but empirical evidence is still sparse. Lots of "efficacy" data (Deaf families); scant "effectiveness" data (hearing families). What's out there LOOKS bad, mainly b/c researchers have claimed to study "signing" kids who don't actually have access to sign lgs.
Hall & Dills (2020, JDSDE), 1/7: The “crucial question”: what type(s) of linguistic input maximize a DHH child’s chances of mastering at least 1 language by school entry? We still lack good data. Why? In part, because of limitations in “communication mode” as a construct.
7/7: (7) To create groups (e.g. as predictor variable), use bottom-up classification algorithms that will consider the child’s overall “language access profile”, and identify other child with similar experience across all dimensions.
Manuscript: https://t.co/9EyYgSlS3M
6/7: (4) Distinguish sign languages from manual expressions of spoken languages. (5) Distinguish among various manual strategies for representing spoken languages. (6) Quantify *extent* of access to various types of input, not just presence/absence.