@OzlphMUFC We've seen it before, if had a REAL preference, he wouldn't accept the move, simply. Then Man United would hold the power in negotiations with West Ham, but he chose not to do that.
@TottenhamTiers@MatteMoretto Like these people either don't know what's going on or don't want to say. Improve contract with the player? I thought it's not a problem with the player, makes no sense.
@DougieJSinclair@nxcious@MogulMoves@feinberg_mc@Infume_@MCSR_Ranked Once dragon dies it has to fly to certain y height above the fountain before it fully dies. Feinberg's dragon was rotating around the zero slightly different and maybe slightly higher due to the explosive timing, so it just happened to have to do another swoop to be low enough.
@SebC__ If in a year you don't get him because someone else agrees to sign him on a free, he may as well been on a 1000 year contract, you pay the money, you get him.
@milan9344@DeltaData_ The thing is if this analysis excludes dirty air laps, it may exclude Norris' laps where he was quicker than Piastri and include the ones where he degged off and was slower than while in dirty air, not sure if that's true or not.
@Ace12Adam Haven't you learned, Peter Windsor is basically an LLM, just puts words together to try and sound coherent. Look into what he says and about 99% of the time, it is garbage.
@technorodrigo It is so funny that literally everyone is pretending this is about the Verstappen comments, when it is obviously about Norris saying they are slower than Ferrari and Leclerc thinking he's lying. Like are you doing it intentionally or just that ignorant?
@VirgilDuck I just don't get this, firstly, this is not what the show is about at all. Secondly, They are magical creatures who have a goal of killing humans. If you or people want to relate that to humans calling other humans monsters and saying they must die, that's not our business.
@lundgren_rosa@FergiesRightRef@goodworkmb Yeah, they can minimise the EV for a given algorithm, like i think 1 and 100 are choices in this case but even if there were mitigation somehow, with enough information, they can always choose numbers that lose. I just assumed when he said he chooses, I didn't think with info.
@lundgren_rosa@FergiesRightRef@goodworkmb In this case, for 49, if you randomly choose when even numbers like 50 and 51, it can be st they can't make it guaranteed 7 for any number I think? They can make you lose money, but i wonder if there is a way to increase the noise of the search to negate this?
@FergiesRightRef@goodworkmb So you're waffling?
If you consider the expected value is
5*0.01+4*0.02+3*0.04+2*0.08+1*0.16+0*0.32+(-1*(1-other probabilities)=0.37) since you are guaranteed to find it in 7.
This gives a value of +20 cents, so doing this a million times, I earn approximately 200000, you earn 0.
@Ad8yasPriv Stop projecting, step back, look at what you are arguing, seriously. If we consider your argument (even though a yellow is not a vsc, which is what you said) it is 1.5 tenths and there is 1.5 laps left. Norris was faster by 4 tenths, 6 tenths and 4 tenths in the previous 3 laps.
@Pra7ky@F1GuyDan Norris could have pitted for it in mexico to get it, because he had the gap but not anywhere else. He did a 1 stop with Leclerc and everyone else went 2 stop so they had faster laptimes. But there is no point in doing that when there are no points.
@melyastapppen @Marius39709194@F1GuyDan What is the point this year? You don't get points. And Abu Dhabi, he never could have gotten it. So, yes he could have gotten it in mexico as he had the pitstop gap, but there was no reason and people behind were on 2 stop so, of course they would have faster laps.