Cody Schilling

Wine, coffee, film and cheap whiskey enthusiast!

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@EcuaComrade @nickfromnorwood @DeGette5280 Literally a lie. Use Google

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@PrestonDelToro Dick

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@laralogan @grok is this true?

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@rileyhopebrown Hi

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@KoensAndrew Hi

[LibertyJ @LibertyJen]

Good morning.

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@The_Caleb_Con Too hard to choose. Daddy, lean, otter....

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@ahabhames Definitely would love it

[John James @JohnJamesNI]

TQ+ have caused so much damage to the gay community.

We don’t support castrating kids
We don’t support telling boys they’re girls
We don’t support telling girls they’re boys
We don’t support men in women’s sports
We don’t support death threats
We don’t support your narcissism

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@lluisliftz Yes. Always

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@yeMikeSmith 2

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@AustinChapmanxx Amen!

[TheRealMAGACaleb @The_Caleb_Con]

I’m still waiting to be bussed to the mandatory gay concentration camps 🤔🤨

Been packed for months 🙄

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@lluisliftz Me

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@CornOnTheGoblin @TFLN Gee whiz

[Jack Pownall @jackianpownall]

The assertion that gender identity is a “scientific concept that is undeniably true” greatly oversimplifies a deeply complex and unresolved issue in psychology, neuroscience, and developmental science. What you’re describing — asking a child “Are you a boy or a girl?” and treating their response as empirical proof of an innate identity — is not a scientific test of an internal, immutable essence. It’s a measure of self-labeling within a gendered social environment, not proof of a hardwired identity. Children answer that question based on what they’ve learned about social roles, language, and expectations. It tells us something about their development, yes — but not about the existence of a metaphysical inner gender.

More importantly, science has not identified any biological marker or neurological structure that determines gender identity. While some studies have found correlations between brain features and transgender identity, these results are inconsistent, often confounded by hormone treatment, and well within the normal range of variation across all sexes. As noted in the literature, “there is no brain, blood, or other objective test that can detect gender identity or distinguish a trans-identified from a non-trans person.” It is self-reported, introspective, and currently unmeasurable by any standard scientific tool.

And while you suggest that a deeply held belief — “I am male” or “I am female” — is proof in itself, that raises a serious question: how do you know what it feels like to be male or female if you’ve never been anything else than your own sex? The claim of innate knowledge assumes that gender is somehow universally knowable from the inside — which is both philosophically murky and heavily reliant on cultural conditioning. We’re not born knowing what “girl” or “boy” means — we are taught it.

Yes, some children persistently assert a cross-sex identity — and that reality should be treated with compassion. But that doesn’t make gender identity an innate and universal feature of the human brain. As developmental research shows, a substantial percentage of gender-dysphoric children desist by adolescence, and the growing number of detransitioners in recent years suggests that for many, identity can shift over time — particularly when it emerges in adolescence rather than early childhood.

Your appeal to the authority of 60 years of “documentation” fails to reflect the actual scientific consensus, which is that gender identity is likely multifactorial — shaped by early biology, yes, but also by personality, environment, family dynamics, and social context. That’s not “denying reality” — it is the reality, as described by experts in the field.

What’s more, your position entirely sidesteps the growing concern — voiced by feminists, ethicists, and even some trans people — that “gender identity” often reproduces sexist stereotypes. If a male child says “I feel like a girl,” we must ask what that means. If it means anything other than what it feels to be born in a female body and to experience life in that context, are we not reinforcing the very sex-role stereotypes feminists have spent decades dismantling?

There is a world of difference between supporting individuals who experience gender dysphoria — which we absolutely should do — and elevating a subjective feeling to the level of scientific fact with legal and medical ramifications. When children or adults experience distress around their sexed bodies, they deserve empathy and support. But that doesn’t mean society must restructure sex-based rights, spaces, or data collection around the untestable assertion of a “true self” rooted in internal conviction.

So no, questioning the claims of gender identity ideology is not “denying reality.” It is being scientifically literate, philosophically coherent, and ethically cautious in an area where clarity matters.

[CAMILLE PAGLIA STAN ✨ FAN ACCOUNT @Provokatov]

I want to make this my Zoom Meeting photo at work.

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@lluisliftz Anytime!

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@lluisliftz Always

[Cody Schilling @FaCoCody]

@Dan21x Definitely