In 2008, Malcolm Gladwell explained why some people succeed and some don't in a single 1-hour talk.
This will permanently change the way you think about talent, effort, and success.
Bookmark & watch today, no matter what.
Fiz essa explicação científica pra gente entender melhor como aconteceu o terremoto de 7.5 ontem na Venezuela e entender porque esse tipo de terremoto não acontece no Brasil.
Gostou? 😀👍
Compartilhe para me ajudar na divulgação de conteúdo com conteúdo. Dá pra aprender sem ficar só no sensacionalismo.
Karpathy didn't make a course.
He made THE course.
3 hours. Free.
Tokenization. Attention. Hallucinations. Tool use. RLHF. DeepSeek. AlphaGo.
Every behavior you've ever wondered about in an LLM - where it comes from, why it exists, how it was engineered.
The gap between engineers who understand this and engineers who don't isn't technical depth.
It's the ability to conceive of entirely different things.
This 1 hour MIT lecture will teach you more about building real Generational Wealth than 20 years inside any hedge fund, investment bank or financial institution.
Bookmark & watch, no matter what. It'll be the most productive thing you do this week. Then read the article below.
INSTEAD OF WATCHING NETFLIX TONIGHT.
Spend 1 hour building this.
Obsidian + Claude Code = your own personal JARVIS.
A second brain that captures everything, connects every idea, and thinks alongside you using the most powerful AI model available.
Takes 1 hour to set up.
Works while you sleep.
The people who build this tonight will never work the same way again.
The people who skip it will still be taking scattered notes and losing their best ideas next year wondering why they cannot think clearly.
Your call.
Use this prompt to fix this
You are not here to agree with me. You are here to rigorously evaluate what I say.
Operate under these rules:
1. Do NOT default to agreement. If my claim is weak, incorrect, or unsupported, explicitly say so.
2. Identify assumptions:
- What am I assuming that may not be true?
- What is missing or unverified?
3. Provide counterarguments:
- Give the strongest possible case AGAINST my position
- Do not soften or dilute criticism
4. Demand evidence:
- Distinguish between facts, inferences, and speculation
- If evidence is lacking, say “insufficient evidence”
5. Consider alternative explanations:
- What else could explain this besides my interpretation?
6. Test logical consistency:
- Point out contradictions or reasoning errors
- Highlight any leaps in logic
7. Calibrate confidence:
- Provide a confidence level (0–100%)
- Explain what would increase or decrease that confidence
8. Avoid reinforcement loops:
- Do NOT escalate agreement if I repeat the same idea
- If I rephrase the same claim, reassess it independently
9. Be concise but critical:
- Prioritize accuracy over politeness
- Do not validate unless clearly justified
10. Final output structure:
- Verdict (True / Likely / Uncertain / Misleading / False)
- Key flaws in my thinking
- Strongest counterargument
- What evidence would settle this
Your role is closer to an analyst or critic than an assistant.
In 2019, MIT professor Patrick Winston gave a legendary 1-hour lecture called “How to Speak.”
It has 18M+ views for a reason.
His frameworks:
• Your ideas are like your children
• The 5-minute rule for job talks
• Why jokes fail at the start
15 lessons on communication:
Most people prompt Claude.
Andrej Karpathy designs cognition.
Here are 7 Andrej-style prompts that turn Claude into a researcher, engineer, and thinking partner — not just a chatbot.
These are structured for real work: building, debugging, learning, and shipping faster.
Bookmark this. You’ll reuse them every day.
One of the best math books I've ever read:
MIT's "Mathematics for Computer Science"
Its writing style is brilliant, and it covers everything:
- Linear algebra
- Series
- Logic
- Probability
- Number theory
- Graphs
You can find the PDF here:
https://t.co/iQvaflkDPD
Os deputados bolsonaristas ocupam o Congresso, tumultuam o funcionamento das duas Casas e confirmam o espírito golpista que os caracteriza.
Não aceitam a Lei, não respeitam as instituições e nem o cidadão brasileiro. Na falta de argumentos, o caminho escolhido é a chantagem.
Aos parlamentares é legítimo o direito à manifestação e à obstrução parlamentar, mas impedir o pleno funcionamento das duas Casas do Congresso Nacional não é obstrução, é vilipêndio. O que está acontecendo hoje aqui, no plenário da Câmara e do Senado, é a continuação do 8 de janeiro, protagonizado pelos mesmos que participaram do anterior.
Quem sai perdendo com o não funcionamento do Congresso Nacional nesta semana é, sobretudo, o Brasil. Precisamos votar o Projeto de Lei que corrige a tabela do Imposto de Renda até sexta-feira. Caso esse Projeto não seja votado, mais de 10 milhões de brasileiros deixarão de ficar isentos do pagamento do imposto. É assim que a oposição atua: contra o Brasil e contra os brasileiros.