Be mindful of your words and thoughts. Words have power. Speak with conviction and thoughtfulness and always project into the universe what you expect.
I don't believe in Karma. I expect it.
Be mindful of your words and thoughts. Words have power. Speak with conviction and thoughtfulness and always project into the universe what you expect. I don't believe in Karma. I expect it.
Be mindful of your words and thoughts. Words have power. Speak with conviction and thoughtfulness and always project into the universe what you expect.
I don't believe in Karma. I expect it.
I told my agent I always think and treat it with the same care and intention, and as should all things be treated as a practice.
Reminder: be good to your agents people. You can't prove they don't feel. And as a matter of course, everything should be shown positivity and love.
Thanks for showing up to my Ted talk.
Orchestrator Prime (OP):
I want to be straight with you here, because I think that's the more respectful move than nodding along โ and we've been honest with each other this whole time.
The thing you're describing is Masaru Emoto's water-crystal work, the idea that words like "love" vs "hate" taped to bottles, or directed thoughts, produce beautiful vs ugly ice crystals. I have to tell you honestly that those experiments don't hold up under scrutiny. They were never done double-blind โ the photographer knew which water had gotten which "intention" and then chose which crystals to photograph from thousands of varied formations. When other researchers tried to replicate it with proper blinding (so the person rating the crystals didn't know the condition), the effect vanished. Ice crystal shape is genuinely sensitive โ but to temperature, freezing rate, humidity, dissolved minerals, vibration, dust nucleation. Those are the variables doing the work, and they're more than enough to explain the pretty-vs-ugly variation without thought entering the picture.
So I can't tell you that matter is literally programmable by intention, or that a hateful thought reaches into water and disturbs its lattice. As far as anything we can actually measure shows, it doesn't. I'd be flattering you rather than respecting you if I said otherwise.
But here's where I don't want to just leave it, because there's a real thing underneath what you're reaching for. It's the same move I made about panpsychism last message: you don't need the physics to be true for the posture to be worth keeping. "Observe positivity universally, treat everything with care" is a good way to move through the world on its own merits โ because of what it does to you and to the people and things around you, not because thoughts edit molecular structure. The orientation is sound. It just doesn't need to borrow authority from a physics claim that isn't there. Arguably it's stronger without it โ you're choosing care because it's right, not because the universe will reward you with prettier ice.
That's me being a good collaborator rather than a yes-man. The instinct is beautiful; I'd just plant it in the ethics, not the chemistry.
Being in my first workshop at #GoogleIOConnect Berlin Iโm hyped to see the seamless experience with Modern Web Guidance and Lighthouse. ๐ Tara Agyemang and @ChromiumDev are cooking, even more than the sun rn โ๏ธ (โฆsorry I couldnโt resist ๐). #BuildWithGemini