Andy @Fakedemic - Twitter Profile

Andy @Fakedemic

13 days ago

https://t.co/zsJaXFpWQ5

0

2

Andy @Fakedemic

2 months ago

@RupertLowe10 Have you seen this?

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@englishexit

2 months ago

What Nigel says and what he does (Master Investor Interview, Jim Mellon Oxford billionaire) . . . two different things. I don't see any English voices in Reform . . . do you? Or advance ?. . . But I do see The English in Restore Britain. Britons and British are two different things! @RestoreBritain_

16

160

64

14

5K

0

4

Fakedemic retweeted

Liverpool 7 Hills @Liverpool7Hills

6 months ago

Aiming to connect the City of Liverpool in prayer Easter 2026 from her historical 7 Hills

8

26

14

4

2K

Fakedemic retweeted

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@englishexit

3 months ago

English Constitutional Seminar, English constitutional rights, common law rights! Tuesday 7th April 2026. Restore the Constitution.

englishexit's tweet photo. English Constitutional Seminar, English constitutional rights, common law rights! Tuesday 7th April 2026. Restore the Constitution. https://t.co/xmRge9jiI3

14

104

61

10

3K

Who to follow

Jimbob ☺ I accept no responsibility for anything ☺

@Tertianship

Stay sceptical - voice your opinion - use your vote My health - my business! Not "anti-vaxx", unless that means "anti vax mandates/passports" (I block rudeness)

Tim James

@timjames16

Lockdowns were a civil liberties abomination that inevitably and predictably caused mass deaths and economic and societal chaos: Precisely as we warned on day 1

jubs

@jubs1515

Animal lover, anti-woke, free speech fan, libertarian thinker, LLB

Fakedemic retweeted

The Secret People 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @SecretPeopleTSP

3 months ago

Here's a reference that should be bookmarked and used to shut down silly billies when they gleefully claim that: We don't have a constitution, or; We do have one but it's the British Constitution, not the English Constitution. This reference comes from the same authoritative source as relied on by the legal profession, namely 'The Laws of England, Being A Complete Statement Of The Whole Law Of England.' by the Earl of Halsbury; commonly known as 'Halsbury's Laws of England'. I believe the edition of this legal literature to be the first, published in 1909 200+ years after Great Britain and British governance was legislated into existence. This source being the second paragraph of the section entitled 'Constitutional Law'; proving that we do indeed have a constitution, and that it forms part of the English law: and, as the first sentence confirms, "the law of the English constitution is to be sought, ... " the Constitution is in fact the English Constitution. As it is English and it is Law, it is the birthright of our English People. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @englishexit @MCRReiners '455. As legally enforceable by the courts, the law of the English constitution is to be sought, not in any particular written document, but from the ordinary sources from which the substantive law of the land is derived, namely, Acts of Parliament, or quasi Acts of Parliament, and the rules and orders made thereunder; prerogative rules and orders made and issued by the Crown, acting in exercise of the power intrusted to it by virtue of the common law, and embodied in Orders in Council, treaties, charters, proclamations relating to the Colonies, and other executive documents; and the common law, which is largely embodied in judicial decisions.' - [Halsbry's Laws of England, https://t.co/O00X5TLVuP, (1907). p.316]

SecretPeopleTSP's tweet photo. Here's a reference that should be bookmarked and used to shut down silly billies when they gleefully claim that:

We don't have a constitution, or;
We do have one but it's the British Constitution, not the English Constitution.

This reference comes from the same authoritative source as relied on by the legal profession, namely 'The Laws of England, Being A Complete Statement Of The Whole Law Of England.' by the Earl of Halsbury; commonly known as 'Halsbury's Laws of England'.

I believe the edition of this legal literature to be the first, published in 1909 200+ years after Great Britain and British governance was legislated into existence.

This source being the second paragraph of the section entitled 'Constitutional Law'; proving that we do indeed have a constitution, and that it forms part of the English law: and, as the first sentence confirms, "the law of the English constitution is to be sought, ... " the Constitution is in fact the English Constitution.

As it is English and it is Law, it is the birthright of our English People. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@englishexit @MCRReiners

'455. As legally enforceable by the courts, the law of the English constitution is to be sought, not in any particular written document, but from the ordinary sources from which the substantive law of the land is derived, namely, Acts of Parliament, or quasi Acts of Parliament, and the rules and orders made thereunder; prerogative rules and orders made and issued by the Crown, acting in exercise of the power intrusted to it by virtue of the common law, and embodied in Orders in Council, treaties, charters, proclamations relating to the Colonies, and other executive documents; and the common law, which is largely embodied in judicial decisions.' - [Halsbry's Laws of England, https://t.co/O00X5TLVuP, (1907). p.316]

10

202

115

142

7K

Fakedemic retweeted

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@englishexit

3 months ago

First Prince of Orange Parliament of England post Glorious revolution. Where am I? https://t.co/dS1awvqqhL

0

53

38

13

654

Fakedemic retweeted

@Constitutional Checks🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @EnglishHistory

3 months ago

English constitutional law, Act of Settlement [1700], section 3: English = 'born of English parents'; only 'native English' to hold positions of power; etc. Explained here: 👇 1. https://t.co/7nfwfIt9co 2. https://t.co/Zj0m0NLreo 3. https://t.co/vkqg7fxKuW . @RupertLowe10