Falahbrook

Investor.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

I’ve outperformed the S&P 500 and Warren Buffett over the last 5 years.

No financial advisor. No following. No network.

Just conviction, patience, and a few principles that have guided me.

Here's how 🧵

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@BitcoinNewsCom Who will buy the fake paper money to keep the ponzi running?

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@ZynxBTC @LawrenceLepard @thebtcpharaoh I will never invest in them.

A leopard doesn't change its spots.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@ZynxBTC Even if Bitcoin remains flat for the rest of the year, $ASST can still do very well if SATA remains at par.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@btcblockjams The solution is to fire the miners over and over again until there are no miners left.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@BTCtreasuries Brutal mNav mogging that doesn’t look like it’ll stop.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@hilbertspaess There is a less than 1% chance this doomer BS actually happens.

The AI bubble is larger and more comical than the dot-com bubble hysteria.

@JG_Nuke

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@stutxo The place was clearly compromised by the Big Bitcoin mining cartel.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@ZynxBTC @RoaringRagnar Bro, just ignore.

Idk how anyone following this would paint you or @RoaringRagnar as the bad guys.

It's only thanks to you both this has come to light, it was hidden in the weeds and even institutions likely missed it.

Keep up the great work, both.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@rouma_ss @mattkratter You’ve missed the point entirely.

“Possible” applies to both; neither is a credible attack vector.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@rouma_ss @mattkratter It’s technically possible. So is guessing your seed phrase.

"Technically possible” isn’t the standard for a credible attack vector.

The more extraordinary assumptions the attack requires, the weaker the argument becomes, not stronger.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@ZynxBTC @gerovich Exactly, bunch of yap with no substance.

Avoided the core question.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@RoaringRagnar What are the nuances?

An article about this would be interesting.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@ZynxBTC A legacy 20% pool created enormous upside for management while shareholders were left floundering as BTC accumulation stalled.

Once reputation is tarnished it's hard to build it back up.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@mattkratter Your consensus is literally decided in a Discord poll.

Just embrace the centralised altcoin you have chosen.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@ZynxBTC @DylanLeClair @RoaringRagnar If management itself now agrees the anti-dilution feature should be removed, why wasn't it removed at the 2024 pivot?

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

The essence of investing.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@ZynxBTC I don't know where this guy came from, but he and his team haven't put a foot wrong thus far, excellent work @ColeMacro.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@RoaringRagnar The lack of communication, combined with the halt in BTC growth, has tarnished $MTPLF's reputation.

The lesson: management matters enormously in BTC corps.

If BTC growth stops while management benefits and shareholders flounder, people will rightly question the incentives.

[Falahbrook @Falahbrook]

@RoaringRagnar The balance of ATM usage is the key I'm watching out for.

Still doing excellent to capture more growth, but not ruin momentum.