TheFarmersWife

Wife. Mom. Nan. AR Rice Farmer. Speech Language Pathologist.

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

As I said yesterday at our Patriot meet-up, Trump has known about this effort and so has the GOP, with some even participating in it. You live in a near-total surveillance environment. The Trump team has access to all the same surveillance tools and has been using them. If you want to map the system, you have to allow it to operate for a period of time. That period of time has expired and the warning shot was just fired. It will break containment and spread if all of us participate in exposing it. You can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Y'all need to read every last word of this. As you are aware, I've been saying this to you since I began my research into Operation Gladio, CIA, money laundering, narco networks, etc. The Treasury department, in the past, has been a major part of how this perpetuates. We discovered Robert Anderson, an Eisenhower Treasury Secretary that eventually went to prison for basically money laundering.

Many other Treasury secretaries papered over significant evidence like BofA providing the seed money to set up BCCI, a criminal entity used by intelligence agencies to money launder, traffick arms and narcotics etc. No one ever went to jail. Not because they weren't guilty but because they belonged to the same clubs as those in government who were suppose to hold them accountable. Until we get ACCOUNTABILITY there will no end to it. When an American can go to jail for bouncing checks but bankers can launder trillions of dollars supporting narco traffickers killing your children, we don't have a government...we have a criminal syndicate disguised as a 'government.'

[Rich Does Politics (Crypto Rich) @CryptoRichYT]

Excellent commentary on how and why Russia has waged the war with Ukraine as it has.
Russia is not just out to defeat Ukraine, it is using attrition to slowly destroy NATO, the EU, and the UK.

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Here's the article I promised early...let me know your thoughts and please don't forget as you are reading it...Gen Lemnitzer was running the CPC and ACC within NATO that oversaw all NATO country's Gladio operations. The same Lemnitzer that wrote Operation Northwood planning Gladio terrorist attacks inside the US and was removed from the CJCS and reassigned to...NATO by JFK. I'm assuming the CIA never told the president about their NATO Gladio project. Now we know why, they used it to kill him.

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Does anyone else find it interesting that everyone wants to talk about why JFK was assassinated and who may have been behind it BUT never about who actually pulled the trigger?

Everyone also knows (that has a functional brain) that LHO didn’t kill JFK even if he fired a gun that day. But if they can keep you arguing about that you never get to the part of: WHO ACTUALLY PULLED THE TRIGGER? SEVERAL TIMES?

JFK’s assassination is one of THE most important reasons why almost no one in America has ever heard about NATO’s secret armies and Operation Gladio. Why? Because once you understand it and read the information already available you will unequivocally conclude that NATO secret army assassins killed JFK. Period. They pulled the triggers.

They don’t want you to conclude that bc you’d notice immediately that Gen Lyman Lemnitzer was NATO’s military commander at the time. The same guy that signed Operation Northwood. The plan to use our Gladio element in the US (Cuban exiles) to kill Americans dressed up as Castro’s Cubans in false flag operations to justify a ground invasion. That plan was written in coordination with the CIA. Allen Dulles sat in the alternate command post watching his operation take place 22 Nov 1963 as the PREVIOUS CIA director. Someone should figure out just when the first draft of Northwood was written.

Lemnitzer also sat beside Dulles at Operation Sunrise with Nazi Gen Wolfe where the agreement was reached to transfer the stay behind Nazi unit ls to the US control which morphed into Operation Gladio: NATO’s secret armies via Detachment Alpha which Gen Eisenhower and Lemnitzer oversaw in Europe.

Pile on the fact that the oil magnates in Texas, through cutouts, paid for Eisenhower’s farm and the Rockefeller’s (oil) funded his presidential campaign and the picture becomes even clearer.

The cover up of the JFK was deemed so important by every president, why? Because it exposes NATO, the US military, CIA, FBI, LBJ, Congress, big oil, even a Supreme Court justice.

My only question at this point is how many French OAS assassins were on the ground in Dallas? I’m working on an article that will answer that question using all the information I’ve uncovered with source documents and you can decide for yourselves. My only question remaining is why won’t anyone else even talk about any of this?

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Everyone following me,

Please read this post. We’ve known for some time that my account has been throttled bc I expose the CIA and their history. We’ve had our Spaces experience sabotage routinely. If you want to help get the information to a wider audience, I need your help.

You all know I’ve spent years doing the research. I spend hours each day writing articles, posts to expose the information. I’m asking you to take a few minutes to engage as decided to ensure the widest distribution of it. You have done an amazing job thus far in helping us grow this account despite the attacks we continue to grow.

Operation Gladio continues to be discussed in more and more venues bc of you. Many ppl ask me what can they do? This is our fight: exposure. Accountability can only happen after the history has been exposed. Despite being one of the only accounts on X exposing NATO, its secret armies, and the CIA’s role in it, we’ve never had a post go viral. This explains why. I usually don’t comment on this bc it appears self-serving. It isn’t. I personally don’t need to do this, I don’t need to dedicate years to a project that jeopardizes everything I’ve worked so hard to accomplish…BUT, my oath doesn’t expire and I couldn’t sit by and not do something to expose this evil that has rotted our country from the inside.

Thank you for being part of this effort to expose the truth. We’ve built an amazing team together. I see many of you tagging this account in other ppl’s post to broaden the exposure and it has been amazing to watch the truth finally making its way into conversations. I was looking through YouTube a couple of days ago and the amount of recent shows discussing Gladio has ballooned. You did that. We’ve moved the needle.

[Rich Does Politics (Crypto Rich) @CryptoRichYT]

It's happening! Tickets to Rich Does Politics Live are limited & likely to sell out soon!
Join us all live or on the livestream. Me & @the_irascible @NakedHedgie @EMBurlingame @MarkAttwood @JoinTAB_USA , plus a very special guest too!
TICKETS FOR LIVE EVENT - https://t.co/30yTemiV1y
TICKETS FOR LIVESTREAM -
https://t.co/kDIUSxYbRc

[Brad Zerbo @BradCGZ]

Just for the record I have been loudly calling out the "Elections are rigged, Dont Vote" psyop for years.

I saw it explode in the aftermath of 2020, it popped back up in 2022, ramped way up in the lead up to 2024 and shocker all of a sudden here it's again all over X in 2026.

Voting isnt the only battlefield, but it's always the most important one. Its an odd act to protest too, because of all the things we do to fight the system voting is the hands down easiest one. It requires one single hour of your time every 2 years. Lol

And yes, your vote does count.
And yes, the powers that be are going to try and cheat every single year.
And yes we are going to work to catch and prevent them every single year.
The more involved in the process we get, the less votes they will be able to steal.
THIS IS WHY SHILLS WANT YOU TO LOSE INTEREST IN OUR ELECTIONS.

[ALPHAWARRIOR @xAlphaWarriorx]

TO VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE...IT'S NOT A QUESTION

There comes a moment when every generation finds out what it is made of.

Not when things are easy.
Not when the path is clear.

But when faith is tested, institutions are questioned, morale is collapsing, and good men are being told that nothing matters anymore.

That is when you stand.

I think about the Americans who came before us......the ones who crossed frozen rivers, stood behind stone walls, charged beaches, crawled through jungles, crossed deserts, and carried their brothers home.

They were not promised victory.
They were not promised fairness.
They were not promised they would even live to see what came next.
They simply understood that freedom survives only when someone is willing to carry it forward.

If I had been alive in 1775, I would like to believe I would have been tightening my gear, checking my rifle, looking at the men beside me, and preparing to march.

Not because I knew we would win. Because some things are worth standing for even when the outcome is uncertain. That spirit cannot die now.

You can question the system.
You can demand accountability.
You can challenge corruption.
You can refuse blind trust.

But never confuse distrust with surrender. Washington called liberty a sacred fire. Lincoln called our duty unfinished work. Kennedy told us not to shrink from responsibility.

Now the torch is in our hands. Maybe this is our moment. Maybe history is looking at us right now and asking the same question it asked every generation before us:

Will you carry it forward?

I know my answer.
I will not quit on America.
I will not surrender my voice.
I will not surrender my duty.
I will stand.
I will fight lawfully.
I will speak.

I will vote.

And I will do everything I can to leave this Republic stronger than I found it. For those who came before us. For those standing beside us And for the Americans who have not been born yet.

It is our turn now.

SEMPER FI,
-ALPHA

[TheFarmersWife @FarmersWife1995]

@GhostofBPH https://t.co/ZqvQEXPNyE

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Back when I was in the E-4 Mafia, I had a very wise chief who was notorious for asking "AND THEN WHAT" whenever we came up with an idea we thought was brilliant but was really dumb.

Elections don't pause because one side is angry. They happen regardless, ballots are counted from the people who actually cast them, winners are certified, and those winners take office and exercise power. A boycott is not a veto. It is a concession of the field.

That is the core of the “and then what?” question. The system does not stop operating when a faction withdraws. It operates with a different electorate.

Turnout is not a moral statement. It is math. Midterm electorates are already smaller and older than presidential ones. Relatively small shifts in who shows up flip close House districts, Senate races, governorships, state legislative chambers, and secretary of state offices, school boards, etc and the secretary of state offices actually run the next election.

In a year of narrow majorities, that is decisive. A boycott large enough to be “a protest” is large enough to lose the House, lose or shrink a Senate majority, lose state trifectas, and lose the officials who set voter-roll procedures, audit rules, and poll-worker training. Those offices do not sit empty. They are filled by the people who did participate. And then what? You are dealing with a California and not a Florida where you can still make a difference.

State legislatures that flip write the next round of election statutes. Secretaries of state who flip administer the next round of elections. The boycott does not freeze the rules in place. It hands the rule-writing pen to the side that kept voting.

“The system continues without you” is not a slogan. It is the design. And then what?

Courts still decide cases, but the judges who hear them are confirmed by the Senate that exists after the election, not the Senate that would have existed if the boycotters had shown up. None of that machinery requires the consent of people who stayed home.

If the complaint is that electronic machines are vulnerable, that noncitizens are on the rolls, or that a federal SAVE-style bill failed, the practical question is who will be in a position to change any of those things afterward. Sitting out reduces the number of legislators who share that diagnosis. It does not create a legal or institutional pause button. Reasonable people can still want tighter ID, paper trails, and citizenship checks. Those changes require majorities, not absences.

A one-party Congress or a flipped state government can move election law in the opposite direction: more mail voting, weaker ID, different purge rules, different funding for election administration. That is the predictable “and then what.” The protest does not make the existing system more legitimate or more conservative. It makes the next iteration of the system less responsive to the people who walked away.

Protest-by-absence has a poor record as a strategy for institutional change. Walking off the field does not cancel the game. It also severs the only peaceful, legal mechanism most citizens have for replacing the specific officials they blame. Primary challenges, state-level bills, litigation, paper-ballot requirements, risk-limiting audits, and citizenship-verification programs all require people in office who will pursue them. Those people get there by winning elections under the current rules, however imperfect those rules are judged to be.

Frustration with the Senate’s failure to pass the SAVE America Act, with machine vendors, or with enforcement of existing citizenship laws is real for many voters. Converting that frustration into non-participation does not punish the Senate or the vendors. It reduces the coalition that can punish them later. The election still happens. The winners still govern. The only variable the boycotters control is whether they have any representatives left inside the room when the next set of rules is written.

And then what?

[Barbara M Boyd @BarbaraMBoyd]

Hey guys. I just wrote a pamphlet about how there is a solid theme in all history since the American Revolution, Jacobins, Nazis, Communists, Socialists, Anarchists all deployed by the modern Britisn Financial to stop the spread of the American System of economy--what Prez. Trump is implementing now. You can get it at https://t.co/y9UUlVuxGp

[ColonelTowner-Watkins @ColonelTowner]

Back when I was in the E-4 Mafia, I had a very wise chief who was notorious for asking "AND THEN WHAT" whenever we came up with an idea we thought was brilliant but was really dumb.

Elections don't pause because one side is angry. They happen regardless, ballots are counted from the people who actually cast them, winners are certified, and those winners take office and exercise power. A boycott is not a veto. It is a concession of the field.

That is the core of the “and then what?” question. The system does not stop operating when a faction withdraws. It operates with a different electorate.

Turnout is not a moral statement. It is math. Midterm electorates are already smaller and older than presidential ones. Relatively small shifts in who shows up flip close House districts, Senate races, governorships, state legislative chambers, and secretary of state offices, school boards, etc and the secretary of state offices actually run the next election.

In a year of narrow majorities, that is decisive. A boycott large enough to be “a protest” is large enough to lose the House, lose or shrink a Senate majority, lose state trifectas, and lose the officials who set voter-roll procedures, audit rules, and poll-worker training. Those offices do not sit empty. They are filled by the people who did participate. And then what? You are dealing with a California and not a Florida where you can still make a difference.

State legislatures that flip write the next round of election statutes. Secretaries of state who flip administer the next round of elections. The boycott does not freeze the rules in place. It hands the rule-writing pen to the side that kept voting.

“The system continues without you” is not a slogan. It is the design. And then what?

Courts still decide cases, but the judges who hear them are confirmed by the Senate that exists after the election, not the Senate that would have existed if the boycotters had shown up. None of that machinery requires the consent of people who stayed home.

If the complaint is that electronic machines are vulnerable, that noncitizens are on the rolls, or that a federal SAVE-style bill failed, the practical question is who will be in a position to change any of those things afterward. Sitting out reduces the number of legislators who share that diagnosis. It does not create a legal or institutional pause button. Reasonable people can still want tighter ID, paper trails, and citizenship checks. Those changes require majorities, not absences.

A one-party Congress or a flipped state government can move election law in the opposite direction: more mail voting, weaker ID, different purge rules, different funding for election administration. That is the predictable “and then what.” The protest does not make the existing system more legitimate or more conservative. It makes the next iteration of the system less responsive to the people who walked away.

Protest-by-absence has a poor record as a strategy for institutional change. Walking off the field does not cancel the game. It also severs the only peaceful, legal mechanism most citizens have for replacing the specific officials they blame. Primary challenges, state-level bills, litigation, paper-ballot requirements, risk-limiting audits, and citizenship-verification programs all require people in office who will pursue them. Those people get there by winning elections under the current rules, however imperfect those rules are judged to be.

Frustration with the Senate’s failure to pass the SAVE America Act, with machine vendors, or with enforcement of existing citizenship laws is real for many voters. Converting that frustration into non-participation does not punish the Senate or the vendors. It reduces the coalition that can punish them later. The election still happens. The winners still govern. The only variable the boycotters control is whether they have any representatives left inside the room when the next set of rules is written.

And then what?

[Joshua Reid | Redpills.tv @realjoshuareid]

Which elections are fake?

Is the mayoral election in my town of 1,500 fake?

Kenny, Bob, Mike and Steve… I know these people.

I don’t see Soros or Israel funding their $3000 of political donations that Ken used to run the ice cream social last week…

What about the school board elections where conservatives have won seats?

We have had massive victories over the years in that area specifically…

Have some been cheated?

Absolutely.
That’s the fight.

What about one of my audience members who just won his primary for precinct delegate?

Was that fake?

Does his work count?

Do the people who voted for him count?

My point is this—

Corruption, fraud and interference exist.

They deserve investigation and accountability.

This requires changing State and Local laws where the fraud and corruption exists so we can ensure it never happens again.

Then demanding laws at the federal government level that holds States responsible and accountable.

That’s what we are fighting for.

But that doesn’t make every election fake nor every election compromised.

“Fraud exists” and “every election is fake” are two very different claims. You cannot use the first as blanket proof of the second.

And the screenshot you shared describes a temporary interruption of early voting to address a technical issue, with voting scheduled to resume the next day.

How does that justify suspending elections across the country?

Who gets to decide when elections stop and when we’re allowed to vote again?

That’s some serious redirection of political power.

Would it be the same government that we don’t trust?

The same officials we want to hold accountable?

You’re demanding accountability while proposing we suspend the public’s ability to replace the people in power.

Identify the fraud.
Produce the evidence.
Fight it where it exists.
Organize, challenge, run for office and remove corrupt officials.

I know you have worked relentlessly on this. But explain how pausing everyone’s elections gives power back to the people?

Because I see the people losing their opportunity to choose and the people already in power benefiting.

Maybe, just maybe, we’re looking at this all the wrong way.

People are screaming at Trump and Congress to secure our elections.

But much of the responsibility for administering those elections rests at the State and Local levels.

Washington has a role but it cannot replace accountability in our own communities.

Who oversees our voter rolls?

Who runs our elections?

Who sets the procedures, counts the ballots and answers when something goes wrong?

If we believe those institutions are compromised, why would we surrender the elections that help determine who controls them?

My solution…

Vote.

Vote as if your life and your country depend on it, because they do.

Overwhelm the polls with so many more of us that their systems of fraud cannot go undetected.

That is what we did in 2016, 2020 and 2024.

We won all three.

2020 is now coming into view.

Trump won’t let it go and from what I understand it is part of the Grand Jury investigations right now.

Massive voter turnout on our side shuts their system of fraud down.

We know that, so let’s use it.

If fraud happens or an election is compromised, we organize.

Document it.

Demand investigations.

Pursue legal challenges.

Use recalls where the law allows them.

The tools differ by State, but accountability requires people willing to act.

Voting is one part of that responsibility.

What we do between elections matters just as much.

Vote.

[TheFarmersWife @FarmersWife1995]

@SarahHuckabee Thank you @SarahHuckabee

[Andrew Leyden @PenguinSix]

The @POTUS and @FLOTUS on their way to Andrews to meet the Chinese President Xi. are

[Joshua Reid | Redpills.tv @realjoshuareid]

Let’s bitch endlessly about foreign election interference—then cash checks from foreign-funded influence operations and serve as willing nodes in their amplification network.

Apparently, foreign election influence is only a problem when you aren’t getting paid to promote it.

I’m not here to make friends. I’m here to save America. That starts with securing our elections.

[TheFarmersWife @FarmersWife1995]

@JDVance @BlakeSNeff Blessings to all!

[TheFarmersWife @FarmersWife1995]

@Erling Nah

[CannCon @canncon]

With Tom Pritzker's resignation, perhaps we need to call in David Patreaus for some answers. On June 6th, 2011, he was already confirmed as the incoming CIA director.

However, he was still the U.S. and NATO Commanding General for Afghan forces.

What exactly is "Boys with Toys"?

Why is a hotel executive in a "remote valley" of a war zone for a "birthday wish"? (I was in Afghanistan in June 2011. It was not a friendly place...nothing good came from anything "remote")

They claim this was part of a Task Force for business opportunity, but what "business opportunity" is in a "remote valley"? Very, very dangerous places for "business opportunity"

Why is Patreaus loaning out military choppers to a civilian billionaire?

[XX-XY Athletics @xx_xyathletics]

We can’t outspend the ACLU.

But we can out-share them.

Women’s sports are worth it.