@Sargon_of_Akkad But moral realists sometimes have this thing where they are unable to or pretend to not understand that a statement like "racism is wrong" doesn't mean, when said by a subjectivist, that "racism is objectively wrong." It's bizarre.
@JD2344540464083 @thealthype@oliverburdick It would be surprising if they did that, but it's not impossible that they did. And people behaving unexpectedly weird is a lot more likely than the laws of nature being violated
@RealDianeYap No, but maybe they should work on making themselves appealing to the type of men they want if they only ever attract losers; quality women attract quality men
@CptThirsty @SteveMcRae_@SwipeWright @Ilovenigelfara1 That's not a definition, but "Atheism is simply the lack of belief in a God." is. The part before the comma of the proposition "Atheism is not a belief, but rather the lack of belief in God." follows from the definition, and the second part is just a sloppy restatement of the
@kitesthlm@MitchellRossman @The_Feminist_TM Useless for society, but not for the individual. The individual is rewarded with a feeling of accomplishment and fun. Achieving IRL tends to require a lot more boring grunt work, and the sensation you get from having achieved something IRL tends to just not be as potent.
@RokoMijic Bruno Campello De Souza, an IQ researcher with an IQ north of 150, once estimated Trump's IQ to be around 140. Chris Langan has made the same estimation. In other words, they think he's a lot smarter than you.
@ChrisCroy@NathanpmYoung@bryan_caplan Those are neither necessary nor sufficient beliefs to get them there. It's not necessary since some people just want to genocide certain people, and the IQ stuff is just a front. It's not sufficient since most IQ realists don't want to genocide any group.