$Neon 2,5 years later:
Lost IPR 993
Won IPR 879 against Samsung/Apple and Google
Lost 879 Markman CC
First brief in appeal
Company lost money and diluted
And now is probably a better timing for this case
Risk is a lot less - evidence stronger
An appeal win would be a 🚀🚀🚀
$Neon markman appeal
After the first read: compelling arguments.
They might have a shot. They tell a compelling story based on the cc history. They argue that the court erred and have some good arguments.
And now the neon business is offsetting risk…
$Neon 879 Brief
Nothing yet in the docket.
I expect the brief to be under seal for some days because of probable arguments related to the Samsung deal and we then get a redacted version.
I will publish when it comes
Have a great night...
Lawsuit status:
Appeal on lawsuit in texas
879 markman appeal first brief around christmas
Appeal IPR loss:
993 appeal waiting for date for oral hearing.
Appeal on IPR win:
879 against Google - Reply brief filed - calendring oral hearing
879 against SA - SA reply brief
$Neon
Poduct sales of 0,16Musd in a quarter = The cornershop cafe have a greater turnover and produce profit.
My initial idea that the products would sell and offset risk in the lawsuit was a bad assumption.
$NEON vs Apple i California - Joint Case management statement
Requesting continued stay until after IPR and CC appeals etc...
Removes all deadlines
This lawsuit will sleep for some time
$Neon vs Google ipr Appeal - Reply in from neon
Flick vs glide - 70+ pages from Graves
Since they won the IPR in this instance without touching on secondary. This process feels strongest for Neon of the three they need to win for the 879 patent.
$NEON Update:
IPR appeals:
Neon 993 appeal - Waiting for scheduling Oral hearing
*SA 879 appeal - SA re-reply 2 oct
*Alpha 879 Appeal - Neon Reply 4 oct
Lawsuits:
Vs Apple 31 oct, Statement 24 oct
*Appeal 879 Markman vs Samsung: First brief late Oct
all *needs win
Alphabet’s @Google failed to convince a federal magistrate judge in Delaware that it shouldn’t be held liable for any alleged infringement by memory modules it bought from @Samsung of three patents owned by @NetlistInc.
https://t.co/cpIAasaoDN