@CC2Ventures@KashKysh@PrimordialAA Bit different tho, for zksync people missed out after doing weekly/monthly txs for over a year. For L0 people Will miss out because they did <5 decent txs
@TrustlessState@gluk64@zksync@bankless Very easy imo: Criteria and amount elegible seems fair. Difference min/max allocation (1k/100k) too much. Cap max at 30k, use proceeds to increase the min and it would be perfect imo.
@BlurCrypto@gluk64 Criteria pretty good, spread between min and max seems absurd.
Keeping nr of wallets the same, lowering cap to like 30k and using the proceeds to increase min allocation would be perfect imo.
Spread of 1k - 100k: Enormous
Spread of ~3k - 30k: Reasonable?
@PrimordialAA My two cents:
- Fees spend is probably one of the most fair criteria for bridges (Also rewarding low $ users)
- If based on fees, linear seems fair. Based on volume not so sure
- With a point system, inorganic usage (mindless transferring around) could be punished with - points
@CC2Ventures You're right that these low float coins eventually turn to dust. Shorting them is a dangerous game for your average follower though. Last bull market we saw they can have huge pumps (Cause low circulating MC) before their eventual downfall, leaving many short sellers liquidated.
@abrahamchase@LayerZero_Labs I don't get why anyone would turn himself in within hours after an announcement like that if there's a 14 day period. Just wait for more clarity.