"Interdire les VPN", c'est ne rien comprendre à ce qu'est un VPN.
Un VPN, ce n'est pas un produit, c'est un principe. Un tunnel chiffré entre votre machine et un serveur que vous choisissez. Votre trafic ressort avec l'adresse de ce serveur, point final. C'est de la cryptographie et du routage, rien d'autre.
Or ce tunnel chiffré, c'est exactement la même brique technique que le HTTPS de votre banque, le SSH de n'importe quel développeur, le réseau interne de n'importe quelle entreprise. Le chiffrement et le tunneling, ce n'est pas "le truc des hackers", c'est le socle de l'internet moderne.
Donc "interdire les VPN", au sens littéral, ça veut dire interdire les tunnels chiffrés. Et interdire les tunnels chiffrés, c'est casser le e-commerce, la banque en ligne, le télétravail, bref tout ce qui fait qu'internet fonctionne. Vous ne pouvez pas tuer l'un sans tuer l'autre.
Maintenant le concret, celui qui fait que c'est déjà perdu.
Il n'y a pas "un VPN" à bloquer. Vous louez un serveur à 5 euros par mois chez Hetzner, DigitalOcean ou AWS, vous installez WireGuard ou OpenVPN en trois commandes, et vous avez votre propre VPN sur une IP que personne n'a sur sa liste de blocage. Un gamin de 16 ans fait ça pendant la page de pub.
Vous pouvez bloquer les IP des fournisseurs commerciaux connus ? Ça ne change rien à l'auto-hébergé. Pour aller plus loin, il vous faut un pare-feu national avec inspection profonde des paquets et liste blanche de protocoles. Autrement dit la Chine, l'Iran, un appareil de surveillance de masse. Et même ça fuit en permanence (Shadowsocks, V2Ray, protocoles obfusqués qui imitent du trafic HTTPS classique).
Le choix réel est donc binaire. Soit votre interdiction est du théâtre, contournée en 48 heures. Soit vous construisez une Grande Muraille numérique, et même Pékin n'arrive pas à la fermer complètement.
Le fond du problème, c'est que ces gens légifèrent contre l'arithmétique. On ne vote pas une loi contre les mathématiques. Le tunnel chiffré existera tant que le chiffrement existera, et le chiffrement existera tant qu'internet existera.
Des bureaucrates qui n'ont jamais écrit une ligne de code de leur vie décident d'interdire une primitive cryptographique qu'ils ne savent même pas définir. Ils ont déjà perdu. C'est le poulet sans tête : ça continue de courir, mais la décision est déjà tombée.
>Be Elon
>Get bullied so badly as a kid that you end up in the hospital
>Escape into books
>Read more than 8hrs a day
>Teach yourself programming
>Sell a video game at 12
>Leave South Africa
>Sleep on couches
>Work odd jobs
>Get into America
>Build a startup
>Get fired from your own company
>Start over
>Build another company
>Merge it into PayPal
>Get removed as CEO
>Your company gets acquired
>Walk away with nearly $180 million
>Instead of retiring at 31, put almost all of it into three impossible ideas: Electric cars, Solar energy, Rockets
>People tell you you're insane
>Start a rocket company with no aerospace degree
>Learn rocket science from textbooks
>First rocket fails
>Second rocket fails
>Third rocket fails
>Divorce
>Public humiliation
>Cash running out
>One launch away from bankruptcy
>Launch anyway
>The fourth rocket reaches orbit
>NASA signs a contract
>Survive
>Tesla is weeks from collapse
>Save it at the last minute
>Get mocked for wanting reusable rockets.
>Land one.
>Then another.
>Then dozens.
>Turn science fiction into engineering
>Get mocked for betting on EVs
>Turn electric cars into status symbols
>Force the entire auto industry to follow
>Build the most valuable car company in history
>Launch astronauts into orbit
>Create a global satellite internet network.
>Buy Twitter
>Fire most of the staff
>Rename it X
>Walk into politics
>Risk your reputation
>Risk your companies
>Risk your fortune
>Become one of the most polarising people on Earth.
>Get attacked by the media, politicians, competitors, and activists
>Keep building anyway
>Become a TRILLIONAIRE
You have noticed it. ChatGPT feels dumber than it used to. Your prompts that worked six months ago produce worse results now. The writing sounds flatter. The ideas sound safer. The internet itself feels like it is shrinking. Every article reads the same. Every email sounds the same. Every answer sounds like it was written by the same voice.
You thought it was you. It is not you.
Researchers at Oxford and Cambridge published a paper in Nature proving what is happening. They call it Model Collapse.
Here is the mechanism in one sentence. AI trained on AI-generated data gets dumber every generation until it forgets what real human data looked like.
The internet is filling with AI-generated content. Blog posts. Articles. Reviews. Comments. Social media. AI companies scrape the internet to train the next generation of models. Which means the next generation of AI is being trained on the output of the current generation.
Each cycle loses information. Not randomly. It loses the rarest, most unusual, most creative parts first. The researchers call these the "tails of the distribution." The weird ideas. The unexpected perspectives. The things that made the internet feel human. Those disappear first.
What remains is the average. The safe. The expected. The bland.
Then the next generation trains on that. And loses more. And the next generation trains on that. And loses more. The researchers proved this is not a slow decline. Major degradation happens within just a few iterations. Even when some of the original human data is preserved.
They tested it on large language models. On image generators. On statistical models. The pattern was the same every time. The output converges toward a narrow, flattened version of reality that looks nothing like the original data.
The lead researcher put it plainly. "Large language models are like fire. A useful tool. But one that pollutes the environment."
The pollution is invisible. You cannot see which sentence on the internet was written by a human and which was written by AI. Neither can the AI that is about to train on it. And once the tails are gone, they do not come back. The damage is irreversible.
This is not a prediction anymore. It is a diagnosis.
The internet you grew up on was built by humans writing things no algorithm would have written. Strange, personal, imperfect, alive. That internet is being diluted. One generation of AI at a time. And the models trained on what remains are learning a smaller and smaller version of the world.
Model Collapse is not a technical problem. It is a cultural one. The thing that made the internet worth reading is the thing that disappears first.
this didn't "happen", we caused it
first, children disappeared from daily life
most women turn 30 without ever holding a baby (they don't have siblings or cousins, and young babies have been removed from shared spaces), never changed a diaper or watched one up close.
you cant want what you've never seen
second, we killed the single income.
the average family needs both parents working just to get to the end of the month, so raising a family well went from hard to something practically impossible (2-3 months of maternity leave should be considered a crime against humanity).
then schools and media, the whole cathedral, all pushed towards the same direction in a systematic brainwashing effort: pushing every girl at the career, motherhood turned into that despicable thing you settle for when the better options run out, "a smaller life". nothing worth desiring, and if you do you must be ostracised
social media just finished the job.
presented childfree as freedom and ideal life, filmed the worst four seconds of a mothers day and called it a warning or "here's motherhood"
and underneath all of it, we removed people from history
no ancestors you owe anything, no descendants you're building for, just one atomic self detached from any sense of continuity. one life with no purpose other than its own selfish goals
especially for western people who have been taught that their ancestors are the most evil humans who ever existed
someone with no past and no future has no reason to see themselves as part of history, and everything they do revolves around their own pleasure
why would you carry something you were raised to be ashamed of?
so a quarter of women raised in captivity selecting for civilizational suicide becomes inevitable
the idea that this was a conscious choice is delusional.
we are the first species in history to get everything it ever wanted: safety, medicine, abundance, ninety good years, and the result is suicide.
everything else alive still manages to reproduce through famine and plagues. we got paradise and stopped
anyone shutting off their own survival drive with no threat in sight is definitionally suicidal and that's where we are now
No Brasil você não é dono de nada, você é detentor registrado. Seu imóvel existe num livro do cartório, seu carro num sistema do Detran, seu dinheiro num banco que responde ao BC antes de responder a você. Tudo que você “tem” depende de uma instituição confirmar que você tem. O dia que a confirmação falhar, por decisão judicial, bloqueio ou canetada, você descobre a diferença entre posse e permissão.
O Estado brasileiro não quebra porque o colateral é você. Sua renda futura, seu consumo, seu imóvel registrado em cartório. A dívida pública é uma promessa de te taxar pelos próximos 30 anos, e o mercado aceita porque sabe que você não tem pra onde correr. 60 milhões de pessoas dependem de transferência do governo pra comer, ninguém vota contra a máquina. O que sustenta o sistema de pé e forte é a pobreza e dependência.
@VictorMTeles1@oraulsena Fora que é o cargo que mais nomeia ministros e cargos de confiança, mais de 2000. No caso do lula, tudo apadrinhado, corrupto e vagabundo do mst e afins.
@VictorMTeles1@oraulsena É o cargo q+ interfere nos resultados da gestão do executivo. Maior parte dos recursos tomados pelo Estado via imposto vão pro gov federal. Presidente que escolhe o stf. Que pauta mts projetos no CN e Senado. É um cargo crítico sim, se não fosse o lula n faria tanto estrago
Cassino é proibido, mas, se for do governo e chamar de loteria, aí está permitido.
Pirâmide é crime, mas, se for o INSS, aí é previdência.
Agiotagem é crime, mas, se o governo lhe emprestar o seu próprio FGTS, é programa social.
Extorsão é crime, mas se o governo cobrar imposto, é cidadania.
Não entregar o que foi prometido é estelionato, mas se o governo faz isso, é gestão pública.
Espionar alguém é invasão de privacidade, mas se o governo monitorar suas transações bancárias, é transparência.
Imprimir dinheiro é crime, mas se o governo imprimir dinheiro sem lastro e corroer seu poder de compra, é política monetária.
Você participar de um monopólio é cartel, mas se o governo proibir concorrência com as estatais, é interesse nacional.
@veiodoagro Eu acho ótimo, o brasileiro tem mais que se foder mesmo de votar em ladrão incompetente. Que o Brasil quebre cada vez mais e os rentistas vivam como reis, enquanto a classe média vira pobre e os pobres vivem de bolsa do governo
Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption.
That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time.
Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.”
The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs.
That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone.
But the education system still runs on its logic.
A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait.
Neither is being served. Both are being processed.
Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.”
AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student.
One at a time. Every time.
It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle.
It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done.
A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture.
The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does.
No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill.
Because the math doesn’t work.
AI doesn’t have that constraint.
Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.”
The brain isn’t broken. The format is.
Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes.
That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem.
Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.”
Four years. Six figures of debt.
And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you.
The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance.
Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.”
The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you.
Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace.
The question isn’t whether the old model survives.
It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.
Alexandre de Moraes fez Lula ter 12x mais propagandas na televisão do que Bolsonaro.
Isso na semana da eleição!
Eu espero que o Nunes Marques intervenha mesmo. Que toda a jurisprudência Alexandrina seja aplicada.