@AtaqueFutbolero Me mata los burrazos que comentan que lo mandarían al banco o le bajan el precio. La técnica individual cuando queres que la ganen o los quieren robot desde infantiles?
@FedeGiammaria El equipo no daba para hacer presion alta como a el le gustaria, no estaba el fisico para hacerlo. Ganaron todo y lo unico que no ganaron lo perdieron en la final. Nada se le puede reprochar ni al grupo, ni al dt. Solo se puede volver a las bases con un recambio generacional.
Aveces no queda más remedio que felicitar al rival. Los jugadores pudieron no tener su mejor encuentro pero como es de costumbre se vaciaron. Orgullo total esta selección. Cabeza levantada y a seguir intentando que el fútbol siempre da revancha.
Miroslav Klose on Germany trailing Paraguay at half-time in the FIFA World Cup:
🗣️ “I honestly cannot believe what I'm watching. This is one of the most disappointing Germany performances I've seen in a very long time. There is no urgency, no intensity and no personality. It's simply not good enough for a World Cup.”
“The players look completely lost. Passes are careless, the movement is poor, and they're making Paraguay look far more comfortable than they should. Wearing the Germany shirt demands far more responsibility than this.”
“The manager has to take responsibility as well. If your team walks onto the pitch looking this unprepared and lacking belief, then something has clearly gone wrong. Germany cannot keep playing like this and expect to survive.”
“If this performance continues in the second half, Germany deserve to be going home. The badge on that shirt means nothing unless the players are willing to fight for it.”
@amaterasu_jp_33@JohnGalt_is_www Por lo mismo que con la impresora 3D dijeron que cada uno iba a fabricar sus propios productos, pero nadie hoy lo hace. Por qué? Porque queremos el producto, eficiente, bonito y barato puesto en mi puerta en tiempo record. No quiero renegar.
Llevalo al ambiente corporativo.
How "rich" look like when you grow up:
- Live 10 mins from work, 5 mins from gym
- Quiet neighbors
- Money left after bills
- Peace at work
- Drink coffee calmly
- Sleep without worry
- Laugh with old friends
- Travel monthly
- Wake up without alarm
- Say "no" when you want
¡𝐅𝐀𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐎 𝐎𝐑𝐎 𝐞𝐬 𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐍 𝐌𝐀𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐎! 💥
El astro Argentino hace historia, convirtiéndose en el 2º Gran Maestro más joven de la historia. ✨
Con 6/8 en Cerdeña, Oro asegura la norma a falta de una ronda al enfrentarse ahora al subcampeón mundial Nepo.
No solo contamos las buenas.
Ayer llos mercados se pusieron más volátiles y la estrategia no performó bien. Retrocedimos
Lo positivo es que ya tenemos buenas ideas con @giancarlobrusca para potenciarlo ante estas situaciones.
Los mantendremos al tanto. Venceremos si o si 💪
Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability.
The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along.
So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions.
TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.