FiboSV

Funded Trader ICT

[FiboSV @FiboSV]

@raradzeth @AlphaCapitalUK Non, je connais plusieurs personnes qui n’ont pas été payées

[FiboSV @FiboSV]

@tips_voley @bet_2_invest Bravo !

[FiboSV @FiboSV]

@Llou1007 Théoriquement c’est le même événement, mais ce sont deux marchés avec des liquidités et une efficience différentes

[🦈 Dorado | SHARP Betting @Doradobetting]

La CLV n’est pas binaire.
La perdre ne fait pas de toi un mauvais parieur.
Ça signifie que ton timing ou ton évaluation des probabilités doit évoluer.

Tous les parieurs gagnants sont passés par là et continueront d’y passer.
Rien n’est jamais gravé dans le marbre.

[Trung Phan @TrungTPhan]

The Economist has a great piece on strategy sportsbetting apps use to throttle smart bettors:

▫️Skilled players are “sharps” and given “stake restrictions” if they play too well (bets are capped).

▫️Rest of players called “Square”.

▫️In 2025, 4.3% of active UK accounts had a “stake factor” below the maximum bet allowance of 100%.

▫️Sportsbook will take bets with a profit margin as low as 4.5%.

▫️If they are able to do good “player-profiling” and keep the “sharps” from playing, the profit margin can reach 10-20%.

▫️As important as keeping out “sharps” is hooking “whales”, the deep-pocketed players that are willing to keep playing (and losing) large sums.

▫️Some “whales” are actually “sharps” in disguise, though. They’ll lose a bunch of bets to lull the sportsbook then put down a massive bet when they have an edge.

▫️While there is a risk of a “whale” being a “sharp”, the value of a real “whale” is so high that sportsbook will take the risk

▫️“In March 2024 PointsBet, raised its share of online sports-gambling revenue in New Jersey from 11% to 24% after wooing a single cash-spouting customer away from DraftKings.” (I can confirm that this wasn’t me).

▫️How sportsbook profile players:

> Playing on Mobile is a good sign (where majority of people play)
> Playing on PCs is a bad sign (it’s easier to compare odds and run models)
> E-wallets are a red flag (sportsbooks prefer debit direct deposit that can attach a player to a single account; e-wallet is more anonymized and players can move cash between sportsbook more quickly to shop for the best odds)
> Women bettors are a red flag (most bettors are men and “sharps” often use women to place bets)

▫️First wagers are a major tells (typical bettors go after top leagues — NFL, NBA, EPL — and do so near the start of the game).

▫️Popular bets for “squares”: who will win, scoring margins and how star player will perform (also, they love multi-leg parlays).

▫️“Sharps” go after less popular leagues and place bets as soon as odds are published, when they are most mispriced. They also go after less popular bets such as “pts in Q3” or stats from a random player (“Sharps” rarely do parlays and don’t withdrawal winnings often).

▫️One gambling consultant tells The Economist that “By the time a customer places his first bet, [sportsbooks] are 80-90% certain they know the lifetime value of the account.”

▫️”Sportsbooks look at a player’s ‘closing-line value’ — a measure that compares the odds at which he bets with those available right before a match begins. If it is consistently ahead of the market over his first ten wagers, he is highly likely to beat the book in the long run.”

▫️Sportsbook mathematically monitor players and creates a new risk score every 6-8 hours (risk score = estimate of probability that customers will wind up unprofitable).

▫️E-wallet users, women and bets over $100 are flagged. These suspicious bettors are given 30% of maximum bet (and proven sharps only allowed 1%).

▫️High-skilled players will often get a “beard” to bet on their behalf. Most sportsbooks ban this practice but it is widespread.

▫️Safest “beards” are close friends and relatives because you can mostly rely on them to pay out any winnings. The “beards” try to look like degens (playing at 3am, bet non-stop and doing ridiculous parlays) before placing a winning bet.

▫️The most effective strategy for “sharps” is “whale-flipping”. Find a losing gambler, then ask to put a (likely) large winning bet amongst their pool of guaranteed losers.

▫️Once “sharps” max out the people they can use as “beards”, they tap professional networks called “movers”. These “movers” employ a bunch of “mules” who can put down bets on the behalf of the network. Low-end movers charge 10-20% while high-end movers charge 50% of winnings.

***

Lots other great details here: https://t.co/RH1KMF7k90

[KP Tips @KP_tipster]

Sports Betting is basically where trading was heading if regulators overdid it.

In trading, you can still scale. You can still build an edge. You can still withdraw your profits without being treated like a criminal.
Markets have liquidity, you don’t get stake-restricted for being sharp, and the system isn’t designed to shut you down the moment you show competence.

Sports betting? It’s the opposite.

The “regulated” side is so overcooked that profitable bettors get limited, monitored, interrogated, or outright removed… while the alternative is a crypto/offshore world where you’re trusting a sportsbook registered on an island with a population of 14 people and a T&C clause that can void anything.

When you over-regulate to the point where it becomes invasive, people don’t stop, they just move to places with zero oversight. That’s exactly what happened after the ESMA/FCA clampdowns in trading, except trading still kept a functioning structure. Betting didn’t.

There’s no middle ground. The licensed side is hyper-restrictive, and the unregulated side is a Wild West. The people with actual skill get squeezed out of one and pushed into the other.

Regulation should protect vulnerable players, not punish winners and destroy the entire ecosystem in the process. Right now, sportsbooks seem to have forgotten that.

Sports betting is a high-income skill disguised as gambling, and the industry punishes anyone who proves it.

In practice Sports-books manipulate their own Ecosystem.

[Le Bureau des Tipsters @LaTeamBDT]

🔥 À quoi jouent les bookmakers français ?

Entre baisse du TRJ, disparition des boosts/défis, montée des sites hors-ARJEL… le marché français est en train de basculer.

📉 Les parieurs sont exaspérés.
🏦 Les bookmakers étouffent.
🇫🇷 L'ANJ regarde ailleurs.

#TeamParieur
https://t.co/CCvUMiQj55

[SigmaSquirrel @SquirrelSigma]

This kind of talk has to stop. Exchanges and prediction markets aren’t retail playgrounds—they’re dominated by institutional traders and betting teams who have been pricing sports markets for years.

Beating a recreational sportsbook over the long run is hard. Beating exchange and PM market makers on sports is exponentially harder. It's not even close.