🚨 THIS IS INSANE: The 250,000+ FOREIGN VOTERS DHS discovered were just in FOUR STATES
They still have 46 OTHER STATES to comb through.
This is a MASSIVE problem in the months leading up to the 2026 election.
PASS SAVE AMERICA NOW!
We’ve got less than a month to save America this year
By passing the SAVE America Act
An easy workweek isn’t worth losing the opportunity
Share if you agree
Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
Because Scripture repeatedly warns believers about the danger of falling away.
In Hebrews 6:4-6, the people described had been enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, shared in the Holy Spirit, experienced the goodness of God's word, and the powers of the age to come. Yet the passage says they could "fall away."
Hebrews 10:26-29 likewise speaks of someone who had received the knowledge of the truth and had been sanctified by the blood of the covenant, yet later rejects Christ and faces judgment.
Jesus Himself warns in John 15:1-6 that branches "in Me" that do not remain in Him are cut off and thrown into the fire. The command to abide only makes sense if failing to abide has real consequences.
Paul gives a similar warning in Romans 11:20-22. Speaking to believers, he says, "you stand by your faith" and warns them to continue in God's kindness, "otherwise you also will be cut off."
In Galatians 5:4, Paul tells those seeking justification through the Law that they have been "severed from Christ" and have "fallen from grace." One cannot be severed from Christ if he was never united to Him, nor fall from grace if he never stood in it.
The issue is not that a believer accidentally loses salvation, but that Scripture repeatedly warns against abandoning the faith and turning away from the One in whom salvation is found.
@brianhrc1@J17apologetics So there's no point in commenting then, since any christian believes God is sovereign and man in is responsible. How you interpret that is where the contention is. The issue isn't scripture, it's how you interpret it.
That wasn't the point. No one disagrees that God is sovereign and man is responsible. That's just a calvinist talking point to distract from the issues that divine determinism causes.
I can list a few issues it causes:
1. It contradicts scripture in many places.
2. It makes the decree the point at which one is saved and not puts their faith in Christ.
3. It renders Satan and his demons pointless after the fall because all man would be totally depraved and dead, and the ones who were decreed to be saved are persevered to the end.
4. It makes warnings in the bible completely meaningless.
But original my point was simply, mocking and ridicule an idea or concept (not the person) can be used for good to highlight contradictions and absurdities of an argument. The owner of the Babylon Bee talks about it's use in some interviews.
@brianhrc1@J17apologetics Actually, mockery and ridicule can be used as tools to highlight/expose weak arguments. Just ask the Babylon Bee.
But I can understand why you’d want to be dismissive so you don’t have to address the point of the post.
@writeontheedg3@Jmacdog7 Under Calvinism, satan and his demons must be bored since all of humanity is totally depraved already, and those decreed to be saved can’t be thwarted from being so.