I think the word you’re looking for is “legal malpractice.”
They better hope, for their sake, the judge gives CEL token holders the petition date price of $0.81, otherwise they’ll be on the hook to be sued for $2 billion for their legal malpractice, for the simple fact that they devalued our $2 billion claim that belongs to all creditors.
Since @Kirkland_Ellis and @WhiteCase want to devalue our $2 billion claim against @FTX_Official and talk a bunch of nonsense in court to the judge when asked what the $2 billion claim in @FTX_Official is for, we Celsius creditors will happily file a class-action lawsuit against them for devaluing our $2 billion claim and giving the @FTX_Official lawyers a roadmap to dismiss our claim.
Since they’re hellbent on @FTX_Official not paying creditors that $2 billion, perhaps they’d like to pay it themselves, since they’ve bent over backwards to commit legal malpractice against their own clients, the Celsius creditors.
You cannot say CEL token is worth $2.88 in the @FTX_Official bankruptcy and then turn around and say CEL token is worth $0.00, or a forced $0.25 settlement, in this @CelsiusNetwork bankruptcy. That is a clear case of
legal malpractice and any jury will agree with us creditors and award us the $2 billion from these law firms, since they don’t want @FTX_Official to pay it.
@theagentmetro@CelsiusNetwork@CelsiusUcc And you’re the wise man? It’s idiots like you that take shots at other creditors why we get billed $20 million a month, for a grand total so far of $300 million. You talk a good game but you don’t know sh*t.
“Celsius will run out of money in 3 months.” — Debtors | Aug 2022
Mashinsky made the Full Disclosure that CEL Token is not equity in Celsius. The UCC's attempt to treat it as such and wipe out CEL Creditors is criminally fraudulent outright theft.
#Celsius#CelsiusBankruptcy $CEL
@MEACHALLOFFAME@otisa502@crypto___btc We called at the beginning ! Why would a CEO 🤡🤡 spend so much time in spaces for bankruptcy cases. Instead of running his company 🤡🤡🤡
Whoever the fuck is still supporting @SimonDixonTwitt that’s a Celsius creditor needs to stop. This is beyond the pale. Even my Twitter enemies know this isn’t right and we shouldn’t be paying for @SimonDixonTwitt’s failed bid to acquire Celsius’ assets.
A few groups — (loans, custody, withhold, maybe more, not sure) — hired lawyers in this case and settled and I’m told their legal fees were paid. That’s more than justifiable and fair because they litigated with the @CelsiusUcc and they settled and they’re part of the community, so their legal fees being paid is appropriate.
But this bullshit that @SimonDixonTwitt is pulling is outright theft of our estate and all you @SimonDixonTwitt followers who claim he’s a billionaire allowed this shit to happen. He is nowhere close to a billionaire; in fact, only a person that is broke and has no money would pull a stunt like this.
I can only imagine how embarrassed you are as a Simon follower who believed @SimonDixonTwitt, when we were all telling you he’s not an honest person.
Now you see the truth that he’s not an honest person and never has been. No honest person would say I’m donating my time to creditors and helping out Celsius creditors and then turn around and bill the estate and say it’s not me, it’s @BankToTheFuture, as if we don’t know he’s the CEO of @BankToTheFuture. That’s how stupid this man named @SimonDixonTwitt feels retail creditors are.
I’ve said many times @SimonDixonTwitt believes retail creditors are stupid and they are to be taken advantaged of, which is exactly what he’s doing.
This is the definition of “unjust enrichment.”
This poor excuse 4 a human being, Aaron Colodny, is supposed to be defending us creditors, not destroying us. What an absolute villan. That's another thing I'm thankful for on this Thanksgiving day 🇨🇦 weekend, is @otisa502 💜🙏 His integrity and grit hold no bounds.
We creditors have to really ask ourselves a question now, and it’s a numbers-based question:
Why would Aaron Colodny and the @CelsiusUcc put at risk $3.5B in the Earn Class just to subordinate $128M of CEL token claims?
That math doesn’t add up. Something else is afoot here.
Retail CEL token creditors deserve an answer about why they’re being subordinated from $0.81 to $0.25 in a court of law, where you can appeal the CEL token $0.81 Petition date decision if it’s not favorable to us.
We deserve to know why, as the world watches on, these big-name law firms of @WhiteCase and @Kirkland_Ellis — who combined have charged us more than $100 million in legal fees so far in this bankruptcy — are trying to steal retail CEL token creditors’ money by saying that the $0.81 Petition date price is not the real price of CEL.
Try and wrap your head around this bullshit: They say the real value is not $0.81 on the Petition date, yet they can’t answer the question of what the real value was on the Petition date. Their so-called expert Max Galka said he didn’t know, only that the Petition date price of $0.81 is not the real value. “So what’s the real value, Mr. Galka?” Answer: “I don’t know. “
That’s what they’re telling the world, that they want to use that argument to steal tens of millions of dollars from innocent retail CEL token creditors and having the court victimize bankruptcy victims twice, first that we have to suffer through a 15-month bankruptcy, and secondly that retail CEL token holders have their claim subordinated from $0.81 to $0.25.
But guess what, I don’t give a fuck. I put up my 1,638,111 CEL tokens worth $412,027 US dollars, of which $154,992 is eligible for liquid crypto distribution.
They can go pound rocks if they think me losing $412,000 of value will scare me. Aaron Colodny of @WhiteCase told me in our “settlement negotiations” that he looked at my account very closely and his face told me he was very impressed, so he should know I’m not here to fuck around.
And if the judge rules against me, meaning rules against us, and don’t honor our $0.81 Petition date price, I’ll simply file an appeal, and I know I will win that appeal, because they have provided zero evidence to show us why CEL token should be subordinated from the $0.81 Petition date price to $0.25. All they’ve provided is hot air and charged the estate over $10 million just on this CEL token subornation issue, and the 6-member @CelsiusUcc is funding and backing it all with our money.
#CEL81