Financial Engineering

Exposing financial scams, corporate scandals, and shady business practices. Youtube rewarded me by terminating my channel.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

Hey @TeamYoutube,

I just filed a formal complaint under the EU Digital Services Act for nuking my channel with no explanation and meaningful human oversight.

I investigate financial scams. You banned me for allegedly promoting them.

Let's see what the regulators have to say.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@JaguarGator9NFL @TeamYouTube For a business pulling in $60B, you'd think they'd have decent customer support for creators they depend on. But no, had to outsource it to broken AI. They obviously don't care about the creators.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@YouTube If you want to thank your creators, fix your content moderation system. A channel exposing scams gets nuked for "promoting scams", while scammers run rampant on your platform unimpeded.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

Hey @coffeebreak_YT, has your channel ever been nuked for promoting scams?

A channel exposing financial scams just got terminated by @TeamYouTube for apparently promoting get-rich-quick schemes. You can't make this up.

Full story here: https://t.co/6YPSnQ8dza

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

I exposed a get-rich-quick scheme and @TeamYoutube rewarded me by nuking my channel. Apparently, exposing scams=promoting scams.

This is the video that aparently contains "scams and deceptive practices."

Meanwhile, the very scheme I'm criticizing is running rampant on YT. Shame

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@TeamYouTube I already filed an appeal. I just want a confirmation than an actual human is looking into this and demand my case to be reviewed immediately. My channel got nuked while the very scheme I was exposing continues unimpeded.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

A channel that exposes financial scams has been nuked by @TeamYouTube for promoting financial scams. I received no warning, and my channel has been removed without any specific explanation of what supposedly violated the policy. I urgently need this escalated for a HUMAN review

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

My video about exposing a Youtube coaching scheme has been reinstated (again), after being targeted by fake copyright strikes, thank you @TeamYouTube!
Let's see how long it stays up this time.
https://t.co/hqfXay6TzQ

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@TeamYouTube I appreciate the bot response, but I'd prefer an actual human to review the case.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

My video has now been struck three times by different claimants. Your team has manually reinstated it twice already. @TeamYouTube I kindly request you look at this case and reinstate the video as before.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

Update: @TeamYouTube reinstated my video. Thank you for actually reading the case and making the right call.

I got multiple copyright strikes and got sued for exposing a $6,800 coaching scheme.

Here's the video they're desperately trying to remove:
https://t.co/YkCKsvc37o

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

I exposed a $6,800 coaching scheme. @Youtube rewarded me by removing my video for copyright infringement. They also repeatedly rejected my counter notifications.

You tell me if you think this video constitutes fair use.

Let's see how they handle this one. @TeamYouTube

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

Still no response from @TeamYouTube, your bots completely locked me out of exercising my rights to fight abusive copyright claims. This video was manually reinstated by your own team, only to be struck again 3 days later, claiming "original song" on a video with no music.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@TeamYouTube How exactly do you explain a music copyright strike on a video with no music? I'm still waiting for those promised DMs.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

Hi @TeamYouTube My video was manually reinstated by YT legal team on July 20th. Struck again July 23rd by a different claimant. Filed a counter notification, got flagged for "misusing" the process. This is textbook abuse of your copyright system and your bots are making it worse

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators I'm being walked in circles.
Your legal team tells me to file a claim. Your bots reject it. Repeat.
Your own legal team manually reinstated the video on July 20th. It's now down again and I can't dispute it.
Can I get an actual human to review this?

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@TeamYouTube My claim has now been rejected twice by your bot system. I am now unable to exercise my legal right to dispute a copyright claim through YouTube's standard process. I am requesting urgent human intervention. @TeamYouTube

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

Getting a copyright strike on a video that's already been cleared of copyright infringement by your own team is really something, if you can't fix your system, at least get an actual human to review the case. @TeamYouTube

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@TeamYouTube Following, thank you for the quick response!

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

@TeamYouTube My video isn't eligible for a counter notification yet. I'm simply trying to get details on the copyright claim itself, as YouTube's own email said information is available on request. The claim was filed by a music rights company against a video that contains no music.

[Financial Engineering @FinEngYT]

Hi @TeamYouTube, @YouTubeCreators I posted a video exposing a $6,800 coaching scheme. I got a copyright strike from a third party with zero connection to my content. No details on what was allegedly infringed. 6 days to respond, only getting bot replies. https://t.co/YkCKsvc37o