They all condemn "settler violence" until a Palestinian fights back. Then the Palestinian becomes the terrorist and the settler becomes the victim.
Liberal Zionism for you
Calling us Houthis is like calling the Iranian people Khomeinis. Wouldn't it be better to call us Yemenis instead of Houthis?
I wish that were the case, because "Houthi" is the title of the leader of the Yemeni revolution, Sayyid Abdul-Malik Badr al-Din al-Houthi, while the entire population participated in the September 21, 2014 revolution. Therefore, you should call us by our true name: Yemenis or Ansar Allah (Supporters of God).
The name "Houthis" is used by our enemies to belittle us and deny our existence as a state, government, people, and army. Therefore, I hope you will not call us by the name our enemies use for us.
Zakaj javna televizija vztrajno zavaja in niti ne omeni, da je Vzhodni Jeruzalem pod nezakonito izraelsko okupacijo? Cel prispevek je propaganda, ne novinarstvo, kar izmenjava med novinarjem in veleposlanico na koncu lepo ponazori.
https://t.co/xIXMx3VFRb
In the early 2000, this clip was shown on Palestine TV. A few weeks later, Israel completely destroyed the Palestine TV building in the West Bank, but not before I obtained the footage from them.
I'm posting it to show you a glimpse of how these jewish supremacist parasites have been targeting and terrorizing our children for decades.
Imagine waking up, opening the paper, and reading that you - and your descendants - have been stripped of citizenship.
This is the experience of over 2000 Kuwaitis this week alone.
This is not a joke:
Israel is saying Hezbollah is violating the ceasefire by firing against the advance of the Israeli occupation forces in Nabatiyeh district, south of Lebanon.
That Ben Gvir post that everyone is sharing aghast? It is a perfectly normal and common Israeli view, held by millions. It is the Israeli mainstream, and not extreme in the least. I grew up hearing that endlessly
This is not a rant by a random genocidal lunatic. It's a public post by the national security minister of the Israeli regime.
The genocidal death cult headquartered in Tel Aviv is a threat to all of humanity. It threatens all humans. Its only interest is permanent war.
I have been a scholar of Hizbullah for over three decades, and throughout that time I have been repeatedly asked when, whether, or how, it will disarm. Yet in the context of Israel's daily terrorism in the south and the Bekaa, and beyond, the question today has become even more absurd, because those who pose it somehow still fail to grasp that they aren't simply asking about an organisation, but about whether an entire people — the people of the south, the Bekaa, and Dahyeh, Lebanon’s Shia community, and a constitutive part of the Lebanese state — should willingly surrender the only means through which they have resisted their own genocide. And the answer to that is something that rings even more true today than it has in the past--there will be no disarmament of Hizbullah's Resistance, with a capital R, or of any other popular resistance that may emerge with a lower case r, so long as the genocidal Israeli entity exists.
Meta illegaly downloaded 80+ terabytes of books from LibGen, Anna's Archive, and Z-library to train their AI models.
Aaron Swartz downloaded 70 GBs of articles from JSTOR (0.0875% of Meta) in 2010. Faced $1 million in fine and 35 years in jail. Took his own life in 2013.
In light of what can only be described as the Lebanese president, Joseph Aoun’s historic betrayal yesterday and Netanyahu's assertion the day before that Israel’s freedom of action to strike Lebanon forms part of its agreement with the Lebanese state, it’s now evident that the Lebanese government isn’t even pursuing a humiliating peace settlement along the lines of the infamous May 17 agreement. Viewed alongside the U.S. State Department memo Aoun finally took ownership of, it becomes patently clear that these talks are structured around the singular purpose of disarming and dismantling the resistance, and not merely normalisation with the Israeli enemy. This is nothing short of a counter-resistance security agreement whereby the Salam government lends Lebanon's sovereignty to the reproduction of Israeli colonialism on its territory.
This transcends the logic of any post-colonial comprador elite in that Lebanon isn't merely tapped into a relation of dependency or capitulation to US–Israeli demands, but actively reverses its own self-determination and hard-won sovereignty, claiming the sovereign right to redefine treason as “salvation” and resistance in pursuit of sovereignty as treason. In doing so, it does not stop at delegitimising and casting the resistance as the enemy from within, but extends that judgement to its social base, whereby the people of the South, and the Shiʿa community more broadly, are reclassified as a politically suspect body whose refusal to surrender their land to Israel is reinterpreted as complicity in treason.
Conversation with @capassomat on current developments in the Middle East, the Islamic Republic, and the Axis of Resistance. @radiostudent
https://t.co/4zrYlaCwUc
Israel killed every single person in this photo in Lebanon.
Every. Single. One.
All journalists.
Targeted and assassinated intentionally.
For reporting the truth from the frontlines.
The Lebanese government bears direct responsibility for the martyrdom of al-Akhbar journalist Amal Khalil. Its participation in the surrender talks with Israel, its co-signing of the 16 April State Department document, which it has not disavowed, and its declared intent to shamelessly proceed to a second round of talks with our nation's longstanding enemy tomorrow together constitute the political context within which her killing was legitimised. It does so by granting Israel alone the right to self-defence, authorising it to strike “at any time,” while denying Lebanon any reciprocal right, thereby rendering journalists and civilians killable in a manner that exceeds even the May 17, 1983 agreement, which, for all its capitulatory and treasonous character, at least paid lip service to Lebanon’s security as a reciprocal right and tied it, however nominally, to Israeli withdrawal.
But given that this is framed by Lebanon’s president as a “war of others” driven by “suicidal instincts” rather than the “rational” choice he locates in the now ritualised submission he calls “negotiations,” the Lebanese government has clearly absolved itself of any obligation to protect its territory or its people, and instead persists in prostrating itself before its “friend,” Trump, appearing resigned to accepting Israel’s genocidal policies as a price it is willing to pay for its perverse notion of sovereignty, while congratulating itself on “negotiating for ourselves.”
Al-Akhbar’s editorial line is widely seen as supportive of Hezbollah and the Shiite resistance, and it identifies itself as a secular, independent progressive outlet.
Founded in 2006, its roots lie in Lebanon’s secular left, shaped by Marxist currents and the legacy of its founder, Joseph Samaha, a prominent leftist intellectual and former member of the Communist Action Organization. Many of its senior editors, including co-founder and editor-in-chief Ibrahim al-Amin, come from socialist or communist backgrounds.
Unlike much of Lebanon’s sectarian media, the paper advocates for a non-religious state and regularly publishes on issues often considered taboo in the region, including feminism and LGBTQ rights.
In 2010, Ibrahim Al Amine, chairman of Al Akhbar, described the founding ambitions of the newspaper: “We wanted the U.S. ambassador to wake up in the morning, read it and get upset.”
Iranian Jews gather at Tehran's synagogue to honour Iran's late Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.
Follow Press TV on Telegram: https://t.co/LWoNSpkc2J