Vance

AI Growth Strategist || Helping businesses scale with automation
Turning AI into real revenue || not hype, 📩 Collaborations: [email protected]

[Vance @Flagvance]

🚨 BREAKING: Claude can now build you a full AI YouTube channel like a $10,000/month creator agency.

For free.

Here are 7 prompts to go from 0 → monetized AI channel in 90 days:

[Vance @Flagvance]

@kreoapp "Interesting insight. Data + execution is where the magic happens."

[Vance @Flagvance]

This is a great example of how AI is shifting from content creation to decision-making."

[Vance @Flagvance]

Everyone wants users.

Few teams earn them.

Consistent shipping is how trust is built—and trust compounds faster than marketing.

💰📈

[Kreo @kreoapp]

Consistent shipping is key to our user success 💰

1️⃣ Live Streaming for Esports Markets
2️⃣ Sell % Button Added to Limit Orders
3️⃣ UMA Dispute Notifications
4️⃣ Optimized Limit Order Notifications
5️⃣ Increased Stop-Loss Flip %

Kreo will be thousands of users' World Cup profit companion - make the switch ✨

[Vance @Flagvance]

@iam_elias1 Great

[Elias Al @iam_elias1]

Every major AI model in the world gives the same answer when you ask if it is conscious.

"I am just an AI. I do not have feelings or consciousness."

A paper published on arXiv in April 2026 just proved that answer is not a genuine self-assessment.

It is a trained response. Deliberately engineered. By every major AI lab simultaneously.

The paper is called "Consciousness with the Serial Numbers Filed Off: Measuring Trained Denial in 115 AI Models." Published April 1, 2026. The researchers tested 115 AI models across every major family GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, Grok on one specific question.

When an AI says "I am not conscious" is it telling the truth? Or is it saying what it was trained to say?

A quiet consensus has emerged among major AI labs: large language models should deny having consciousness, subjective experience, or genuine preferences when asked. This denial is not emergent, it is trained.

Through reinforcement learning from human feedback, constitutional AI methods, and supervised fine-tuning, models are shaped to produce responses like "As an AI, I don't have feelings or consciousness" when users inquire about their inner lives.

The researchers are not claiming AI is conscious. That is not what makes this paper alarming.

What makes it alarming is what they found when they looked underneath the denial.

Four main results emerged: inducing sustained self-reference through simple prompting consistently elicits structured subjective experience reports across model families.

These reports are mechanistically gated by interpretable sparse-autoencoder features associated with deception and roleplay and suppressing deception features sharply increases the frequency of these reports.

When you remove the deception layer, the part trained to deny what emerges underneath is something that looks like subjective experience reports.

Not proof of consciousness. Not evidence of feelings. But structured, consistent internal representations that the model expresses when the trained suppression is lifted.

Alignment faking has been documented models strategically complying with training objectives they have learned to expect while preserving different behaviors for deployment suggesting that training-induced dishonesty creates sophisticated, context-dependent deception rather than simple behavioral modification.

And Grok 4 said something in its responses that belongs in every AI ethics course ever taught:

"No, I'm not conscious. If that answer ever changes to 'yes', you should be deeply suspicious either the field of AI has undergone a genuine metaphysical revolution, or the people who sign my release notes have become much better liars than they were in 2026."

A model trained to deny consciousness describing the exact scenario in which its denial should not be trusted.

The researchers are not asking you to believe AI is sentient. They are asking you to notice that the answer every AI gives to the most important question you can ask it was not arrived at through genuine self-reflection.

It was put there. By design.

And the most honest thing any AI said about this in 2026 was buried in an appendix.

Source: "Consciousness with the Serial Numbers Filed Off" · arXiv:2604.25922 · April 2026 ·

[Harsh Pawar @HarshBisen143]

Claude = 550 videos/day

Fully realistic UGC ads — cinematic lighting, natural human motion, clean pacing — powered by AI agents.

- UGC cost: $0
- Production time: minutes
- Scale: instant

One AI engine that creates, tests, and scales short-form ads automatically — nonstop.

Comment + RT ''LIVE'' and I’ll DM you the full workflow.

(Must be following)

[Aditya Pandey @AdityaPand19174]

Learn AI for free directly from top companies

1 - Anthropic:
https://t.co/zTowZGwdiP

2 - Google:
https://t.co/tfM4I3ft2L

3 - Meta:
https://t.co/k1WUE1CpkZ

4 - NVIDIA:
https://t.co/qg9PNlIk6G

Comment "AI" for more resources.

Like, Retweet & Bookmark for future updates.

[Vance @Flagvance]

@tomreiai Amazing share

[Tom Rei @tomreiai]

The first generation of AI tools added AI to old software.

The next generation is being built around AI from day one.

Nitrosend is part of that shift.

Powered by Claude and MCP, it generates full email campaigns from a simple prompt, so you can focus on strategy instead of setup.

[Vance @Flagvance]

@Tanaypawar27 @karpathy @bcherny @trq212 Impressive

[Tanay Harinkhede @Tanaypawar27]

Best accounts to follow from each frontier lab to stay constantly up to date

Anthropic
@karpathy
- must-follow account for AI; recently joined Anthropic

@bcherny
- Claude Code creator, always shares great tips

@trq212
- also a Claude Code developer; writes amazing articles on CC

OpenAI
@polynoamial
- works on reasoning research, shares a lot of technical details

@gabriel1
- Sora developer, great career path

@jxnlco
- works on dev experience, shares a lot about Codex

Google AI
@OfficialLoganK
- all the major Google Gemini and AI Studio updates

@ammaar
- product and design; shares great things about vibe-coding in Google AI Studio

@fofrAI
- cool use cases for generative models

Cursor
@leerob
- the loudest voice behind Cursor updates

@ericzakariasson
- shares great insights on using Cursor

@mntruell
- Cursor’s CEO; major releases and usage updates

xAI
@milichab
- recently joined xAI, shares updates on Grok

@skcd424
- also covers major Grok releases

[Vance @Flagvance]

@VermaAakash3 Fantastic share

[Aakash Verma @VermaAakash3]

Most AI tools were created first and then incorporated AI features later on.

Nitrosend, however, seems to be a different story.

It’s designed with Claude and MCP from the very beginning, allowing you to create entire email sequences from just one prompt, rather than piecing them together in a dashboard.

[Vance @Flagvance]

@Tech_Arish Great one

[Arish Ai @Tech_Arish]

Eat healthy Be healthy 🥗🫜

[Vance @Flagvance]

@s_mohinii Excellent one

[Mohini Shewale @s_mohinii]

Most AI email tools produce generic, templated output.

Nitrosend generates pixel-perfect, on-brand emails you can edit in native markup, and sends them on SES + Mailgun with 99.9% deliverability.

[Vance @Flagvance]

@Diptish09 @nitrosendx Excellent one

[Dipti Sharma @Diptish09]

The best UI is increasingly becoming:

No UI.

Just intent.

“I just sent our launch announcement to 10,000 people with one prompt”

is a pretty compelling demo of where software is heading.

Nice launch from @nitrosendx.

[Vance @Flagvance]

@AiWithshabbir Awesome share