Thomas

Der mit dem Hut Lvl. 27

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Cidhappens @uncreativetom WOL is absolutely necessary when doing anything remotely.
Since you can turn on some
Machine, then remote into it.
I agree though that for the average user WOL might as well not exist. However that is still not a reason to lock it in the default driver, because save the planet.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Cidhappens @uncreativetom Those Great features that serve no purpose but be as annoying as possible to the end user, like those display USB hubs, are sometimes enforced by a chip on the hub side, not the OS, so then you can't even disable it. Really thats just a good user experience here in the EUSSR

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Cidhappens @uncreativetom Yeah not forgetting some obscure stuff too like Wake On Lan Networking cards having to be enabled on a driver level, instead of being handled by UEFI / BIOS.

EU be like. "WOL is Climate relevant." Or whatever they pull out their arses.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Yt1Victor @BBT_23 @RocketLeague My guy the game runs on UE3.
Just saying.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@SHL0MS I looked at a few real Monet Painting a couple of days ago. They are very good Paintings.
This is also a good painting.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Kam6942069 @jokotagbaposi Its done on purpose, you are supposed to overlook the clues, like you are in your own bubble. Thats why the main plot focuses on the social aspect, to literally steer your attention away from it, until of course at the reveal, right at the end of the episode.
Its a good episode.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@cutiesting @jokotagbaposi They do not, which makes the episode even more disturbing, because it lacks the typical happy end plot.
In this episode NOT "Everyone Lives"
I won't spoil anything, go watch it.
Its really good.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@RepPress @germancommie @MyLordBebo @grok Further, groks personality is an ENTP (look it up)
Which is already the prime candidate for such behavior, as ENTP people tend to switch into a devils advocate the moment you start arguing, they are going to challenge your position, no matter their own.
Grok also does this.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@RepPress @germancommie @MyLordBebo @grok But a mix of both its personality, and what it expects you to want it to write next.

That's literally how it works.
Hope that explains this phenomenon.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Hockneyesque @Prowl8413 I think a lot of blue button pushers are "worth saving." But the entire point of red is that there was no need to save them in the first place, literally every blue pusher should have saved themselves by not pushing blue. End of story.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Mankosmash @cremieuxrecueil Agree blue doesn't appear to be a realistically achievable bell curve, thus cheated, or manipulation of the data.
Considering we only see this view, this might still be wrong, but the hint is there. Such bumps are very suspicious.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@AdrianDittmann Actually its avoiding the wire, because air actually becomes the path of least resistance.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Hockneyesque @Prowl8413 Ah, no there's a misunderstanding there.
I agree that they do not deserve it.
I disagree that any sort of moral code should or would make red pushers responsible for the fate of blue pushers.
Thats mixing causality and effect.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@Hockneyesque @Prowl8413 Theres no hatred to blue pushers. Only confusion.
You know the rules, red lives
No one is forced to push blue.
Why even start pushing blue.
You're just gambling your life
Every blue pushed does, when the alternative is literally, nothing happens.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@usadoesitbetter @KatanaBets @Doku_HL_SDalt @VitoComedy Agree, once a significant amount of blue votes is visible, the empathy to save them grows, thus the original statement of not knowing in advance who pressed what, is skewed.
Also, once blue gets 50% majority, the moral task shifts to vote blue.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@cloud__alter @ronicarp @its_bxn You don't.
You either die with them, for no reason, or everyone lives anyway.
So why gamble your life?

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@currydtx @23Reyne No you don't.
You confuse foolishness with morality.
You justify death with morality, that your choice of your doom, may prevent billions from the same fate, but this is not the case.
should you die, those you wished to save die too. and you will have achieved nothing.

[Thomas @Flaxify]

@moritzhmu @_richtig_falsch @grok Ist doch egal jetzt.
Du hast doch genügend Antworten auch von anderen bekommen, die dir erklärt haben warum spezifisch auf diese Prompt frage grok's Antwort meilenweit vor gemini (und anderen KI's die ähnliche nicht antworten liefern) ist.