@FayeRCTribunal@NHSEngland This is astonishing. You won your case and they STILL haven’t implemented single sex facilities. I believe the Darlington Nurses are still waiting too. The level of contempt for women’s needs and rights is appalling.
@OakesMarianne If you had read the EHRC guidance, you would be aware it covers ALL protected characteristics; considers a variety of situations and orgs. The info on single sex spaces is only a few pages. Please take time to read and understand it.
@Bitchard11@maccadoo8@Slipstream60@jan_murray I’ve got some bad news for you. As we die off, younger women turn into us. Older women with life experience to know that boundaries are a good thing will always be among you. Woo ha haaa! So stick your ageism and misogyny and grow up to be the Karen you are destined to be.
@mindsci According to Services Code of Practice, if Gender Dysphoria interferes with someone’s daily life, it may be considered a disability. Was in old Code and is also in new Code.
@22llu1@Bexyenigma@BriefcaseMike No, M&S changing rooms were built as single sex cubicles in a room. Mixed sex use requires fully enclosed rooms opening onto free flow space. They just changed signs to mixed sex and didn’t properly design them for mixed sex use.
@SamanthaNiblet4@WomensRightsNet@bbpolitics@amnesty Did you read it? It’s a rather silly report, with extremely poor methodology. It basically complains women have fundraised to bring legal challenges where orgs are breaking the law. What made you treat it seriously?
@labourlewis I can see why they might be concerned about it placing extra demand on existing facilties, but the problem with Accessible is not usually that it can’t meet demand where it’s available; it’s that it isn’t always available. Trans people could support drive to make more available.
@labourlewis 8 million disabled people have told the EHRC that they do not always have access to the Accessible facilties. This has a bigger impact on participating in public life than the tiny minority of trans people who don’t want to use facilties of their sex. Let’s sort that instead.
@labourlewis I don’t really understand why the makers of the RADAR key are appalled at trans people using Accessible Facilties. Accessible Facilties are the provision for those who cannot use standard Facilties. And many of them will qualify as disabled due to gender dysphoria.
@labourlewis Yes, if gender dysphoria interferes with a persons’ daily life (and not being able to use toilet of your sex would imply this is the case), they are protected under Disability PC too.
@labourlewis Women’s spaces are not a facility to affirm the gender identity of a tiny minority of people. If they cannot use the facilities of their sex, they need alternative provision. Accessible is one option.
@stellacreasy The FWS Supreme Court case forensically analyses how Sex and Gender Reassignment in the Equality Act to provide equality for all and why both are needed. Have you read it? Are you proposing to eliminate Sex as a Protected Characteristic and do you understand the implications?
@NadiaWhittomeMP The FWS Supreme Court case forensically analyses how Sex and Gender Reassignment in the Equality Act to provide equality for all and why both are needed. Have you read it? Are you proposing to eliminate Sex as a Protected Characteristic and do you understand the implications?
@daveg641@DollyDa10106663 They are from FOI on MoJ. This is official gov data. Fair Play for Women made their analysis of this data public. If you have a critique, publish it and let’s have that debate about it.
Man tells woman he will continue to exercise his male privilege to force his way into female spaces. Thus revealing he knows what sex he is & understands exactly why it will be hard for women to stop him.
@Alonso_GD What is unreasonable about recognising that Sex and Gender Reassignment are different Protected Characteristics under EA2010 and need different accommodations? They are not the same.