@IUOC4@jeunebenet So now you are back to justifying imperialism.
The Cold War period of the US lost meaning within the decade of the collapse of the USSR. It should have been abandoned then, not 'reformed' into a new imperialistic system.
So long as nations do not threaten you, you leave them be
@lozec_off@ViribusUnitis83 Evil for liking nationalism, stability without internationalism?
For liking it when nations can be peaceful without outside ideas and cultures forced on them?
All nations mind you, it matters not where you are from. Everyone has their nation to look after without globalism.
@lozec_off@ViribusUnitis83 Condemning US neocons, Israeli butchery in Gaza, the Iran war, NATO enlargement, those who praise Hitler and those who praise Stalin is evil?
I suppose to them and their demented pseudo-logic. To anyone with morals, it ranges from neutral to good.
@IUOC4@jeunebenet Every nation seeks to see it's neighbors weakened in some way, however that does not eliminate stability.
Your suggestion is just like US neocons in their wars, that they must strike first to neutralize enemies.
In both cases, it is literally raping other nations.
@IUOC4@jeunebenet There is no difference in forcing your will on someone through harsh brutality or more subtle punishment
In both cases, the will of the people at the periphery is ignored and they are forced to be cogs for their masters' plan
In both cases, it is evil for the benefit of empire
@IUOC4@jeunebenet By making such a claim then, you justify every European colonial empire. Such states were used for survival, development and internal peace.
You also justify every greater nation, from Germany to Israel, in their need for survival and development given lack of resources.
Evil.
@lozec_off@ViribusUnitis83 For what, calling all evil, no matter who does it, evil?
I apologize if actually having morals and principles offends you, however I cannot lower myself to 'justify' evil or condemn it based on ideology.
It is all the same, unless one has no morals, compassion, empathy or honor
@IUOC4@jeunebenet What does claiming territory beyond one's ethnic frontier have to do with large-scale immigration and violence?
Stability comes from within, not from subjugating others on your doorstep, or are you saying that Hitler was right to create a greater state for 'stability'? Evil.
@yan_pagh@PamphletsY Hitler invades Poland from the west, begins murdering, enslaving and deporting the Poles of Poznan for his empire. Stalin does the exact same from the east to Lwow for the same reasons.
Same action, all from an unprovoked war of aggression, same evil mentality.
@IUOC4@jeunebenet That is what every imperialist says, that it's not imperialism when their empire does it.
By contrast I call a spade a spade and label you as an Imperialist. Act differently and the label goes.
@PamphletsY So did Hitler.
Both had to launch unprovoked wars of aggression to enslave their enemies, and whoever else was in the way to get their peace.
Both valued dead infants and thrones of bone over humanity.
Their worshipers are sub-human filth, worse than roach parasites.
@marklevinshow Sadly the US didn't force peace on Israel/Palestine in 2000, as in they would blockade whoever refused Gaza and the West Bank being sovereign, complete with territorial waters.
@IUOC4@jeunebenet What qualifications does any Chinese leader have to subjugate minorities who broke off from their late empire?
None. Same with any other leader of a former empire on any other continent.
The irony of 'anti-imperialists' defending imperialism is both saddening and nauseating.
@lozec_off@ViribusUnitis83 Yes, I can actually call out evil. Hitlerite or Hitlerism/Nazism, Stalinist/Stalinism, Neoconservative, Expansionist Zionism, all imperialistic evil with different names.
None have any more value to humanity than the other.
@CountryFirstRep You put McCain and Romney on that list over Buchanan or even Ron Paul.
That goes to show you represent everything wrong with the GOP in the 21st century.