@DanWetzel Crying about “I wish they would have taken longer to review this and came to the same conclusion” is just sad. They reviewed it in New York it was clearly and INT and they didn’t need any further look
@danorlovsky7 Another player chimes in that doesn’t know the rules of football. He has to maintain possession all the way through the ground. There is no tie, he hit the ground lost possession and JMac ended up with it. Clear as day
@DavidAd65794047@JoshAllenStats He has to complete the catch all the way through the ground. The second he hits the ground he loses control. It has nothing to do with him “being down” it’s completing the process of the catch
@JoshAllenStats If in a hypothetical, JMac wasn’t there and cooks simply lost the ball hitting the ground, it would be incomplete and no one would argue it should be complete. But JMac was there and took it from him before he could maintain possession all the way to the ground
@JoshAllenStats It’s very simple, tie goes to receiver. Cooks didn’t catch the ball however because he didn’t complete the process of the catch. Didn’t get a 3rd step which means he needs to control the ball all the way to the ground, the second he hit the ground he lost it.