Applied Forensics is a state of the art forensic laboratory with offices in New York, Boston, Washington DC and Connecticut. For over twenty years we have been
#signatureverification by "judges" etc is very dangerous. Most only received cursory training and there is empirical data and studies that say poorly trained are no better than 50/50. Their work should only be a screening method.
@TrumanJasper@sportsfreak217@J_Shane_ @LiftHimUp68 @brice402@campbellitstrue@mmpadellan@realDonaldTrump We are handwriting experts & been involved in numerous election fraud cases. The failing is the signature verification. It is done by someone with minimal training doing a 1 on 1 comparison; high error rate. This is extremely difficult. We have had 15 yr old signatures on file
@IPreferPi314@snipesk3@RayMoss91428486@Lindamariadelar @RepAdamSchiff We are not aware of any "stringent signature verification" processes. As handwriting experts, we are aware that many municipalities use poorly trained reviewers who do a cursory 1 on 1 comparison & have the final say. Try comparing to elderly voter's signature from 10-15 yrs ago
@MsMelanie87 @Freddy83299135@HKrassenstein@Facebook It varied greatly; in some cases only very few and in another case we found 100's. The problem arises very often with the elderly where the signature on file is 10-15 yrs old and it is not suitable for comparison. We also look for common authorship with different names.
@MsMelanie87 @Freddy83299135@HKrassenstein@Facebook We are handwriting experts & have testified in numerous election fraud cases. The failing comes in the signature verification. The "match" is usually done by a minimally trained person who does a 1 on 1 comparison. This is an extremely difficult exam with an high error rate.
@Oblivious010 @Gone2DogsResQ @SmugsyBogues @DadLibbys @WomynRD @ProjectLincoln@realDonaldTrump I don't believe so. We have sat on committees to create secure docs. It takes a back and forth, how secure, costs, etc...
@Oblivious010 @Gone2DogsResQ @SmugsyBogues @DadLibbys @WomynRD @ProjectLincoln@realDonaldTrump I wish I could answer that but I can't. There are companies that create secure documents out there ie: travel docs, etc.. They should be able to create a much more secure way to vote.
@MagicalBeaker@fantisbug @ShandraJones15 @dylanstiles73@nunes_alt_cat@realDonaldTrump I hope this answers your question. We are handwriting experts who have testified in several election fraud cases. The failing comes in the signature verification. It is usually done by minimally trained people who do a 1 on 1 comparison. There is a documented high error rate.
@Oblivious010 @Gone2DogsResQ @SmugsyBogues @DadLibbys @WomynRD @ProjectLincoln@realDonaldTrump We are handwriting experts who have testified in numerous election fraud cases. The failing is in the signature verification. It is usually done by people who receive minimal training & conduct a 1 on 1 comparison. This is an extremely difficult exam with a high chance of error.
@Idontwannagrow3 @edengirl58@Acosta We are handwriting experts & have testified in numerous election fraud cases. The problem lies in the signature verification. Reviewers receive minimal basic training & it usually is a 1 on 1 comparison. This is a extremely difficult exam to get right.
@textualdeviance @Seaforde1@jonkarl Quite the contrary. Please visit our website at https://t.co/vLvf1JFmWS and you will see we are quite legitimate certified handwriting experts.
@LuciaParamita @TheNoahRing@realDonaldTrump We are handwriting experts and have done numerous election cases. Where the problem arises is in the signature verification. It is done by persons with minimal training doing a 1 on 1 comparison. They are usually the "final say" These cases are very difficult for our examiners
@grandfatha1 @jsolomonReports We are handwriting experts and have done numerous election cases. Signature verification is usually done by "reviewers" who are poorly trained and tend to "over-associate". These cases are very difficult for us because it is usually a 1 on 1 comparison.
@pup_squeak@nillkitty@Loomy7 We are handwriting experts and have testified in many voter fraud cases. Most signature verification is a 1 on 1 comparison and this is a very difficult comparison. Most “verifiers” are poorly trained and tend to over-associate. Verification software has not been validated.
@CussonJason @merphie77 @EllenLWeintraub I aware of handwriting recognition software but when I google handwriting VERIFICATION software we get a bunch of handwriting RECOGNITION software if you can provide one that has been validated for verification please let us know
@CussonJason @merphie77 @EllenLWeintraub We are handwriting experts who have worked numerous election cases. We are not aware of any technology that allows for signature verification. Can you please provide us with that information? We would be interesting in researching it
@xo415 That is an excellent question I’m not really sure. There are companies out there like Document Security Systems that design secure documents . For now, I foresee a large number of rejected ballots and a lot of people’s votes not counted