@ChainLinkGod@CatfishFishy With respect - Why is this the focus? There are so many things I want a community liaison guy to focus on that aren’t this. I just don’t get it
@CCIPMetrics@maplefinance@Predictstreet Avg CCIP volume as collapsed by about 80% since April where it was c100m per day…
It’s just impossible to know what any of these numbers mean.
One things is for sure - whether throughput is 1m, 10 or 100m there is absolutely no impact on $link demand/pricing.
@ChainLinkGod@MikeIppolito_ I get your point - but someone certainly owns the equity in CLL also.. and they have almost certainly become increasingly wealthy with the proliferation CL products. Not do the token holders.
Just because you aren’t selling equity doesn’t mean there aren’t competing interests.
@CatfishFishy@PreWealthy Well - somebody owns the equity in CLL… and they are almost certainly getting increasingly wealthy as the protocol expands …. Not so the token holders.
Just because CLL are not raising cash via equity sell downs doesn’t meant there aren’t competing interests.
Fake AMA is just awful.
Come on @chainlink@ChainLinkGod@SergeyNazarov - have some respect for the people who have invested in $link based on information you have given them…
@LinkBoi777@chainlink In the past CLL has pitched various means of value accrual for $link - staking, rewards, gas, abstraction etc… they now appear to have abandoned all of these.
Crucially - the reserve never functioned as they described - and they now appear to have abandoned that as well.
In April I posted this - since then throughput has plummeted. The metrics of CCIP make no sense.
It is ludicrous that @chainlink provide no commentary on this, reserve buys, or anything else when they have clearly pitched these as value capture for $link.
@ChainLinkGod
@PronouncedHare I often find reporting on the very narrow list of things I actually know about to be misleading, out of context or just plain wrong.
And then I think - “what about the reporting on all the things I don’t know about, is that equally poor quality?”
Good example here.
@ChrisBarrett Community is the wrong term - these are people who have invested substantial money into your protocol on the basis of information you have provided - most of which is now obsolete.
The current opaqueness from @chainlink is a betrayal of the “community”.
@ChainLinkGod