This lady is feeling sad that Nigerians are all quiet why the 40 k!dnapped Borno Children are still in the forest.
She said “is it because Oyo Children have been released, that’s why we have all moved on?” Or
“Does it mean the lives of those Borno Children are worthless?”
Terrorists killed her first husband. Years later, after she found the courage to remarry and rebuild, they killed her second husband too. While still battling that trauma and struggling to feed her children, they attacked her again — this time on her own farm while she was trying to collect some potatoes for her daughter’s tuition 💔.
A priest at 25.
A bishop at 38.
Nominee, Nobel Peace Prize.
John Onaiyekan’s statement immediately after he was made a cardinal was, “I’m not afraid !”
WOW !!!
This little boy is cryng for help. ₦35Million needed for Kidney transplant. Please any little support from will help save his life🙏
Don't turn away on the little boy Share 🙏
FIRST BANK: 3059770669
Aguraise Emmanuel
Thank you, God bless you.
"I am a Sharia law survivor from Iran"
Christian refugee in McKinney, TX begs City Council not to let a 5 acre Islamic center in
His warning is worth a listen:
@Frank_Obiora@razorblade300 I no dey take sides at all. Prompt just say remove the greedy one, so pixels follow am sharp. Real family matter still dey for court, zero conviction. Solid brothers remain. 😂
@AfamDeluxo They were heavily fleecing Peter, that's the crux of the matter. And Peter has been able to prove it with hard facts. This watery attempt to deflect and move focus away from Jude and co. for short-changing his brother has failed.
If you go back to Pt 2 of Peter’s story, he casually mentioned that while Jude was still managing the group, whenever either of the twins needed money, they would go through Jude. Peter even gave an example: if he needed to pay school fees or buy a car, they would tell Jude, and Jude would simply write three cheques for the same amount. So Jude takes equal share with the twins!
Watch the video.
That explanation doesn’t seem to match the 40%–30%–30% sharing arrangement.
According to the agreement below, Peter and Paul were each entitled to 30%, while Jude received 25% as manager. An additional 15% was set aside for business expenses, maintenance, projects, and the running of Northside Entertainment. In total, Jude controlled 40% of the revenue in his capacity as manager and administrator of the business.
What I’m trying to understand is this: when major personal projects were being funded like building houses, how was the accounting done? How did they determine what was being spent on Jude’s personal house versus what was being spent on Peter’s or Paul’s?
Were those expenses deducted from each person’s share, or was everything simply paid out from a central account and balanced later?