Who reviewed this paper?
A few days ago @gcabanac tweeted about a paper that had published a remark that it had been forced to cite irrelevant papers. You can see the tweet here: https://t.co/FpSr5QLPfW. We remarked that if it was not so serious, it would be funny.
Since reading that tweet, we have not been able to get it out of our head, so we thught that we would document it in a little more detail. We are doing this for three reasons.
1๏ธโฃ In our view, it descerves more detail to be made available.
2๏ธโฃ We'd like these details to be be kept as a matter of public record, so we are posting similar posts on our X account and our LinkedIn account.
3๏ธโฃ It should be of interest to this community, so we hope that this raises even further the ethical issues around this topic.
The first image shows the paper that we are looking at. What is interesting is the text that appears on at the end of the introduction (highlighted in red). This appears to show that the reviewer insisted that a set of 13 papers be cited, else they would not accept the paper. It would be interesting to see the review repport, so that we could be certain what had been said. If you want to see the paper, it is available here: https://t.co/mlv5UDdp5T
In the rest of this ๐งต, we show the papers that have been asked to be cited (i.e. [35]-[47]). These have been taken from the paper mentioned above. You'll notice (as we have highlighted it) that every paper is "et al." meaning, of course, that there are quite a few authors on each paper.
Gicven that we cannot see all the authors, the other images on this ๐งต shows the full set of authors on each of these 13 papers.
We leave it an an exercise for the reader to hazard a guess as to the reviewr is?
Great to attend the first โTeaching Python in Chemistry Meetingโ at @UCLChemistry with @ColeGroupNCL , @osc_ballantyne and @MagdauIoan. Looks to be some interesting developments coming to a university near you. Thanks to @michaelriver and Andrew McCluskey.
Vacancy-ordered double perovskites show intriguing properties; incl strong excitons and weak inter-octahedral hybridisation.
Collab-ing w/ICFO๐ช๐ธ we show room temp miscibility, additivity & tunable stability w/cation mixing (CsโTiโโโSnโXโ; X = I, Br)
https://t.co/aiuu8qHSSY
Defect calculations are often performed at 0 K - yet finite temperature effects can be important!๐ก๏ธ Explored in our Tutorial Review targeting the main contributions to defect free energies - with @Kavanagh_Sean_@KasperTolborg Johan Klarbring & @lonepair https://t.co/P7Lxcs4opI
Very glad to see this work with @jad5888 published! A detailed look at how grain boundaries affect ion transport and electronic conductivity. @SolbatF@ChemistryNCL@EPSRC
https://t.co/EgHVT4hhOZ
Huge thanks to the Scanlon (@scanlond81) and Walsh (@lonepair) groups for putting up with me these past weeks. Itโs been a pleasure! Special shoutout to @Kavanagh_Sean_ for all his help (will never understand why david dislikes you so much ๐คทโโ๏ธ). @uclchemistry@imperialcollege
Kavanagh et al. reveal Frenkel excitons in vacancy-ordered double perovskites :mag: resolving expt/theory discrepancy & showing the importance of orbital character & electronic dimensionality in lead-free perovskites. @Kavanagh_Sean_@lonepair@scanlond81
https://t.co/ctwJIAQc32
Thanks to @SscgR for the opportunity to talk about some of my recent research at the #SSCG2022 Xmas meeting, especially since I couldn't attend in-person. Hopefully it provided some useful insight! @ChemistryNCL@RoySocChem@ChemMater@Cambridge_Uni
https://t.co/jITyaZz5ff
Solid ๐ work from the Newcastle team @FrazerForrester@jquirk_cmt@jad5888
A lot of stuff moving around in batteries, so needs detailed modelling like this to get the full picture! ๐
Delighted to see our @ChemMater cover for our recent study on Li3PS4. Big thanks to @Ella_Maru for the beautiful design! #MyACSCover
You can read the paper here! https://t.co/yqQKMwsqDJ