Iñigo Montoya

[Iñigo Montoya @FredperryG]

@tradingwizardfx UPDATE

[Andrew Tate @Cobratate]

As hard as life can be, the world is a beautiful place if you decide to see the light.

I love you all.

[Liban @LibanLDN]

.@Cristiano

[Owen Shroyer @OwenShroyer1776]

All this to stop a nuke that didn't exist and open a strait that wasn't closed.

[Dan Bilzerian @DanBilzerian]

Joe Rogan is such a pussy, Theo isn’t crazy, he doesn’t need to chill out, he’s just not a scared bitch like you.

[Atlas Press @realAtlasPress]

C.S. Lewis, if he had to give one piece advice to a young man

[kian @kian_sasan]

America vs Persia 2000 years ago

Back to the roots

[Masoud Pezeshkian @drpezeshkian]

To the people of the United States of America

[Stefan @Stefan_B_Trades]

Don't wish it were easier. Wish you were better. Don't wish for fewer problems. Wish for more skills. Don't wish for less challenge. Wish for more wisdom.

Discipline is the bridge between goals and accomplishment.

[Dan Bilzerian @DanBilzerian]

The cabal must fall, the fight isn’t right vs left, it’s good vs evil.

Pick a side, the fence belongs to the devil.

[Pavel Durov @durov]

Today, Telegram notified all its users in Spain with this alert:

Pedro Sánchez’s government is pushing dangerous new regulations that threaten your internet freedoms. Announced just yesterday, these measures could turn Spain into a surveillance state under the guise of “protection.” Here’s why they’re a red flag for free speech and privacy:

1. Ban on social media for under-16s with mandatory age verification: This isn’t just about kids—it requires platforms to use strict checks, like needing IDs or biometrics.

⚠️ Danger: It sets a precedent for tracking EVERY user’s identity, eroding anonymity and opening doors to mass data collection. What starts with minors could expand to all, stifling open discourse.

2. Personal and criminal liability for platform executives: If “illegal, hateful, or harmful” content isn’t removed fast enough, bosses face jail.

⚠️ Danger: This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo.

3. Criminalizing algorithm amplification: Amplifying “harmful” content via algorithms becomes a crime.

⚠️ Danger: Governments will dictate what you see, burying opposing views and creating echo chambers controlled by the state. Free exploration of ideas? Gone—replaced by curated propaganda.

4. “Hate and polarization footprint” tracking: Platforms must monitor and report how they “fuel division.”

⚠️ Danger: Vague definitions of “hate” could label criticism of the government as divisive, leading to shutdowns or fines. This can be a tool for suppressing opposition.

These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control. We’ve seen this playbook before—governments weaponizing “safety” to censor critics. On Telegram, we prioritize your privacy and freedom: strong encryption, no backdoors, and resistance to overreach.

✊ Stay vigilant, Spain. Demand transparency and fight for your rights. Share this widely—before it’s too late.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@martianwyrdlord They are importing voters, because they don’t have the support of their own people

[Iñigo Montoya @FredperryG]

@chacinovencido tus seguidores abogamos por mas hilos como este

[emory tate @tateterrific]

A man does not acquire a full skill-set to be told,"Take Care" be careful" by amateurs. Raw
action solves everything. Caution breeds fear.

[Bryan Johnson @bryan_johnson]

Your n=1 behavior is cosmically significant.

What you do matters, far more than what you think. Large scale systems change through singular points, not gradual shifts.

For example, supercooled water stays liquid at -5°C until a single ice crystal forms. Then the entire volume freezes in seconds. One aligned crystal triggers the cascade.

The same is seen in social systems. Smoking in offices was immovable until it collapsed. Marriage equality went from fringe to law faster than anyone predicted.

Once a committed minority reaches approx 25%, consensus snaps. It happens via nucleation points: individual demonstrations that the new state is viable.

Each person running the protocol creates permission for the next. The pattern replicates fractally until critical mass triggers the phase change.

[Bryan Johnson @bryan_johnson]

The coming years are going to be insane. I say this figuratively and literally. The primary reason is because society is about to enter a phase transition.  This is what a phase transition looks like.

Water at 99°C is hot, stable, behaves like a liquid and follows the laws of hydrodynamics. At 101°C, water becomes a gas, making it chaotic, expansive, and following a different set of physical laws.

The difference between 2026 and 203X is the difference between 99°C and 101°C.

To make this tangible. Imagine you’ve become a proficient swimmer. Mastering your stroke, breathing and pacing. The water is a predictable substrate that you use to model your decisions. This is life at 99°C.

At 101°C the pool turns to steam. You stroke your arms but don’t move. You kick and don’t find resistance. Your swimming proficiency is no longer an asset, it’s a liability. Your muscle memory is a mismatch for the new environment. You have to unlearn to relearn.

This is what life planning is going to feel like going forward.

For most of history, you could make a pretty decent guess about what the future would look like. If you were a farmer in 1400, you knew your grandchild would probably be a farmer in 1450. That was even true in 2003 when I entered college. One could confidently attend college, select a career, plan a profession, and map out retirement by age 65.

We felt confident in these plans because we depended on broad trends (coarse graining) that reliably predicted the future. Things may change here and there, but not enough to give you any pause in your life-planning decision making.

That stability is now gone. For example, my son is 20 and neither he nor I have any idea how to think about his life. Should he go to college? Is college still relevant? What should he learn? Life planning shortcuts are now dead. No one knows. Before, having a five year plan was responsible. Now it’s reckless because the world is moving faster than we can model. The speed of reality exceeds the speed of the observer.

This is the source of the low level anxiety that many people feel. Humans are prediction machines. When an error emerges from what you predicted (water) to what you get (steam), the body registers it as trauma.  It leaves us in a state of chronic hyper-vigilance, scanning a horizon that refuses to sit still.

In this new reality, the move is not to have better maps, but to build better systems. This is what I’ve been building with Blueprint. An algorithmic system of health and decision making that moves as fast as technology, allowing me to evolve alongside.  The more I detach from ideas, norms and expectations, the smoother the glide. The hardest part is letting go of what we know and trust.

This is part of a series of essays that I’ve been writing for my upcoming book Warriors & Caretakers of Existence. A plan on what the human race does when giving birth to super intelligence. If we want the extraordinary existence that is on offer, we’ll need to fight for it.

[ATEO MILITANTE @chacinovencido]

@jordievole Que genio de la geopolítica.
El que le preguntaba a maduro por el matrimonio gay.
Eres un lumbreras.
Anda vete a comerle el sobaco a tu novia cupera.
Que es más fea que el culo de un mono.

[Cosechando CashFlows @CosechandoCF]

La mayoría sueña con ser millonaria.

Yo sueño con algo mucho más simple.

Sueño con poder decir: “yo invito” sin pensarlo dos veces.

Dentro hilo 🧵

[Cristiano Ronaldo @Cristiano]

Esperança que se renova, amor que abraça, família que apoia e luz que guia. Feliz Natal 🎄 ❤️ ✨