Amazon is so scared of The Delivery Protection Act it will fire workers who publicly support the bill. This is nothing but an attempt to silence worker voices by threatening our job security.
We won’t let Amazon stop us from fighting for the safety we deserve. The New York City Council can stop Amazon’s abuse by passing The Delivery Protection Act!
Amazon makes its living by using the corrupt Delivery Service Partner model to exploit workers and hide behind third-party subcontractors when it breaks the law.
It’s time for the Delivery Service Partner model to end. That starts by passing the Delivery Protection Act in New York City.
Amazon sets the routes, the quotas, the uniforms, the cameras — and then tells workers they don't actually work for Amazon. Every delivery worker in this city should be able to afford to live here and have their rights respected.
Workers deserve better.
Don’t worry if reading this makes your head spin. Uncovering a drug’s patent portfolio is like trying to assemble a 1,000 piece puzzle where every piece is hidden and the company that owns the puzzle has a multi-billion-dollar incentive for you not to find any of them.
Cancer drug Revlimid is one of the bestselling pharmaceutical products of all time, with total sales of over $100 billion.
It’s also extraordinarily expensive, costing nearly $1,000 for each pill, even though that pill costs just 25 cents to make.
https://t.co/yZ59WDiHAr
Right to Repair is always a struggle, but despite all the opposition from the worlds most powerful manufacturers, we keep making strides.
Why? They can't undo common sense. People should be allowed to fix their stuff -- in the military, on the farm, in the schools, everyewhere.
Today, the @UAW announced their endorsement of our campaign for US Senate. I am so honored and humbled.
Michigan union autoworkers built the American middle class and proved that when people stand together, there’s nothing we can’t accomplish.
Solidarity forever.
Ok @profthomlambert here is my full response.
1. As the legislative history makes abundantly clear, Congress expressly enacted the Clayton Act in response to Standard Oil's (primordial) RoR. So it wouldn't make sense for a statute to use the RoR when it was enacted to avoid it.